東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Small group instructional feedback: ...

Mauger, Douglas.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Small group instructional feedback: A student perspective of its impact on the teaching and learning environment.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Small group instructional feedback: A student perspective of its impact on the teaching and learning environment./
Author:	Mauger, Douglas.
Description:	137 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-05, Section: A, page: 1523.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-05A.
Subject:	Education, Community College. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3407167
ISBN:	9781109759563

Small group instructional feedback: A student perspective of its impact on the teaching and learning environment.
Mauger, Douglas.

Small group instructional feedback: A student perspective of its impact on the teaching and learning environment. - 137 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-05, Section: A, page: 1523.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--George Fox University, 2010.

Small Group Instructional Feedback (SGIF) is an instructor driven structured mid-term activity. Its purpose is to solicit student specific feedback on instructor effectiveness and provide this feedback immediately back to the instructor. Does SGIF bring about changes to the teaching and learning environment? Do students' perceptions of the course, the instructor, and their motivation towards learning change after participating in SGIF? Do instructors make changes to their teaching after receiving mid-term feedback? An end of term survey was taken of 352 college students (response rate of 95%) representing 20 courses from all departments. The survey (alpha .911) consisted of 33 items on a seven point Likert scale and three open ended items that collected student comments. As a result, 81% indicated that the SGIF improved the teaching and learning environment. Strong positive correlations existed at the .001 level between students' attitudes toward the course, the instructor, and their motivation with 83% indicating that they became more aware of their role in improving the teaching and learning process. Ninety-six percent of the students indicated they observed that the instructor acted upon their feedback. These findings reflect the ability of structured mid-term feedback to act as a catalyst in bringing about changes to the teaching and learning environment.

ISBN: 9781109759563Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018008
Education, Community College.

Small group instructional feedback: A student perspective of its impact on the teaching and learning environment.
LDR:02322nam 2200289 4500 001 1394732
005 20110429093256.5
008 130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109759563
035 $a (UMI)AAI3407167
035 $a AAI3407167
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Mauger, Douglas. $3 1673373
245 1 0 $a Small group instructional feedback: A student perspective of its impact on the teaching and learning environment.
300 $a 137 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-05, Section: A, page: 1523.
500 $a Adviser: Terry Huffman.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--George Fox University, 2010.
520 $a Small Group Instructional Feedback (SGIF) is an instructor driven structured mid-term activity. Its purpose is to solicit student specific feedback on instructor effectiveness and provide this feedback immediately back to the instructor. Does SGIF bring about changes to the teaching and learning environment? Do students' perceptions of the course, the instructor, and their motivation towards learning change after participating in SGIF? Do instructors make changes to their teaching after receiving mid-term feedback? An end of term survey was taken of 352 college students (response rate of 95%) representing 20 courses from all departments. The survey (alpha .911) consisted of 33 items on a seven point Likert scale and three open ended items that collected student comments. As a result, 81% indicated that the SGIF improved the teaching and learning environment. Strong positive correlations existed at the .001 level between students' attitudes toward the course, the instructor, and their motivation with 83% indicating that they became more aware of their role in improving the teaching and learning process. Ninety-six percent of the students indicated they observed that the instructor acted upon their feedback. These findings reflect the ability of structured mid-term feedback to act as a catalyst in bringing about changes to the teaching and learning environment.
590 $a School code: 1149.
650 4 $a Education, Community College. $3 1018008
650 4 $a Education, Curriculum and Instruction. $3 576301
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
690 $a 0275
690 $a 0727
690 $a 0745
710 2 $a George Fox University. $3 1020843
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-05A.
790 1 0 $a Huffman, Terry, $e advisor
790 $a 1149
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3407167