東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

The impact of acceptance of electron...

Borrego, Jesus.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The impact of acceptance of electronic evidence before and after the 2006 Federal Rules of Evidence on criminal cases.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The impact of acceptance of electronic evidence before and after the 2006 Federal Rules of Evidence on criminal cases./
Author:	Borrego, Jesus.
Description:	135 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-05, Section: A, page: 1478.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-05A.
Subject:	Anthropology, Medical and Forensic. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3403015
ISBN:	9781109760170

The impact of acceptance of electronic evidence before and after the 2006 Federal Rules of Evidence on criminal cases.
Borrego, Jesus.

The impact of acceptance of electronic evidence before and after the 2006 Federal Rules of Evidence on criminal cases. - 135 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-05, Section: A, page: 1478.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Walden University, 2010.

Legal scholars have established that the U.S. Department of Justice's 2004 Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) has created confusion in legal rulings on criminal cases involving digital evidence, resulting in conflicting verdicts. With the 2006 FRE update, the Department of Justice attempted to correct the problem. The conceptual framework for this study was established through a synthesis of Casey's and Kerr's contemporary perspectives on forensic and digital evidence. The fundamental research questions were whether the guidance provided by the 2006 release of the FRE contributed to an increase in the number of criminal cases, acceptance rate of digital evidence, conviction rate, and acceptance of plea bargain, or affected the type of evidence presented in criminal cases. In this quantitative quasi-experimental interrupted time series comparative study, the admissibility of digital evidence in the Second Judicial District Court of a western U.S state was examined, based on criminal cases presented before and after the 2006 update to the FRE. Criminal cases were obtained from public records to determine the type of evidence presented at the trial. The analysis of the data using Student's t-test suggest an increase in the acceptance of digital evidence in criminal cases and in the acceptance of plea bargains by the defendant when digital evidence is admitted in the trial. This study can contribute to social change by clarifying the rules for accepting digital evidence in trials, which in turn can provide a foundation for a more equitable adjudication of criminal cases for both victims and defendants.

ISBN: 9781109760170Subjects--Topical Terms:

1020279
Anthropology, Medical and Forensic.

The impact of acceptance of electronic evidence before and after the 2006 Federal Rules of Evidence on criminal cases.
LDR:02686nam 2200325 4500 001 1394538
005 20110429092849.5
008 130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109760170
035 $a (UMI)AAI3403015
035 $a AAI3403015
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Borrego, Jesus. $3 1673165
245 1 4 $a The impact of acceptance of electronic evidence before and after the 2006 Federal Rules of Evidence on criminal cases.
300 $a 135 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-05, Section: A, page: 1478.
500 $a Adviser: Louis L. Taylor.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Walden University, 2010.
520 $a Legal scholars have established that the U.S. Department of Justice's 2004 Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) has created confusion in legal rulings on criminal cases involving digital evidence, resulting in conflicting verdicts. With the 2006 FRE update, the Department of Justice attempted to correct the problem. The conceptual framework for this study was established through a synthesis of Casey's and Kerr's contemporary perspectives on forensic and digital evidence. The fundamental research questions were whether the guidance provided by the 2006 release of the FRE contributed to an increase in the number of criminal cases, acceptance rate of digital evidence, conviction rate, and acceptance of plea bargain, or affected the type of evidence presented in criminal cases. In this quantitative quasi-experimental interrupted time series comparative study, the admissibility of digital evidence in the Second Judicial District Court of a western U.S state was examined, based on criminal cases presented before and after the 2006 update to the FRE. Criminal cases were obtained from public records to determine the type of evidence presented at the trial. The analysis of the data using Student's t-test suggest an increase in the acceptance of digital evidence in criminal cases and in the acceptance of plea bargains by the defendant when digital evidence is admitted in the trial. This study can contribute to social change by clarifying the rules for accepting digital evidence in trials, which in turn can provide a foundation for a more equitable adjudication of criminal cases for both victims and defendants.
590 $a School code: 0543.
650 4 $a Anthropology, Medical and Forensic. $3 1020279
650 4 $a Information Technology. $3 1030799
650 4 $a Legal Studies. $3 1669774
650 4 $a Information Science. $3 1017528
690 $a 0339
690 $a 0489
690 $a 0553
690 $a 0723
710 2 $a Walden University. $b Applied Management and Decision Sciences. $3 1017738
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-05A.
790 1 0 $a Taylor, Louis L., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Brent, William $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Smith, Pamela $e committee member
790 $a 0543
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3403015