東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Evaluating the language of argument

Hinton, Martin.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Evaluating the language of argument

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Evaluating the language of argument/ by Martin Hinton.
Author:	Hinton, Martin.
Published:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2021.,
Description:	xv, 234 p. :ill. (some col.), digital ;24 cm.
[NT 15003449]:	Introduction -- Part I: Language -- Chapter 1. Language and Thought -- Chapter 2. The Meaning of Meaning -- Chapter 3. Language as Argument -- Part II: Argument -- Chapter 4. What Argument Is -- Chapter 5. The Modes of Argumentation -- Chapter 6. Linguistics and Argument -- Part III: Error -- Chapter 7. Fallacies -- Chapter 8. Fallacies of Language -- Chapter 9. Linguistic Fallacies in Philosophy -- Part IV: Analysis -- Chapter 10. Analysis of Arguments -- Chapter 11. Application of the Scheme -- Chapter 12. Conclusion -- References.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Language and languages - Philosophy. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61694-6
ISBN:	9783030616946

Evaluating the language of argument
Hinton, Martin.

Evaluating the language of argument[electronic resource] /by Martin Hinton. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2021. - xv, 234 p. :ill. (some col.), digital ;24 cm. - Argumentation library,v.371566-7650 ;. - Argumentation library ;v.37..

Introduction -- Part I: Language -- Chapter 1. Language and Thought -- Chapter 2. The Meaning of Meaning -- Chapter 3. Language as Argument -- Part II: Argument -- Chapter 4. What Argument Is -- Chapter 5. The Modes of Argumentation -- Chapter 6. Linguistics and Argument -- Part III: Error -- Chapter 7. Fallacies -- Chapter 8. Fallacies of Language -- Chapter 9. Linguistic Fallacies in Philosophy -- Part IV: Analysis -- Chapter 10. Analysis of Arguments -- Chapter 11. Application of the Scheme -- Chapter 12. Conclusion -- References.

This book is concerned with the evaluation of natural argumentative discourse, and, in particular, with the language in which arguments are expressed. It introduces a systematic procedure for the analysis and assessment of arguments, which is designed to be a practical tool, and may be considered a pseudo-algorithm for argument evaluation. The first half of the book lays the theoretical groundwork, with a thorough examination of both the nature of language and the nature of argument. This leads to a definition of argumentation as reasoning expressed within a procedure, which itself yields the three frames of analysis used in the evaluation procedure: Process, Reasoning, and Expression. The second half begins with a detailed discussion of the concept of fallacy, with particular attention on fallacies of language, their origin and their effects. A new way of looking at fallacies emerges from these chapters, and it is that conception, together with the understanding of the nature of argumentation described in earlier sections, which ultimately provides the support for the Comprehensive Assessment Procedure for Natural Argumentation. The first two levels of this innovative procedure are outlined, while the third, that dealing with language, and involving the development of an Informal Argument Semantics, is fully described. The use of the system, and its power of analysis, are illustrated through the evaluation of a variety of examples of argumentative texts.

ISBN: 9783030616946

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-61694-6doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

524977
Language and languages
--Philosophy.

LC Class. No.: P101 / .H55 2021

Dewey Class. No.: 149.94

Evaluating the language of argument
LDR:03046nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 2236664
003 DE-He213
005 20201130135218.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 211111s2021 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783030616946 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030616939 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-61694-6 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-61694-6
040 $a GP $c GP $e rda
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a P101 $b .H55 2021
072 7 $a CFA $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI021000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a CFA $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 149.94 $2 23
090 $a P101 $b .H666 2021
100 1 $a Hinton, Martin. $3 3488252
245 1 0 $a Evaluating the language of argument $h [electronic resource] / $c by Martin Hinton.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2021.
300 $a xv, 234 p. : $b ill. (some col.), digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Argumentation library, $x 1566-7650 ; $v v.37
505 0 $a Introduction -- Part I: Language -- Chapter 1. Language and Thought -- Chapter 2. The Meaning of Meaning -- Chapter 3. Language as Argument -- Part II: Argument -- Chapter 4. What Argument Is -- Chapter 5. The Modes of Argumentation -- Chapter 6. Linguistics and Argument -- Part III: Error -- Chapter 7. Fallacies -- Chapter 8. Fallacies of Language -- Chapter 9. Linguistic Fallacies in Philosophy -- Part IV: Analysis -- Chapter 10. Analysis of Arguments -- Chapter 11. Application of the Scheme -- Chapter 12. Conclusion -- References.
520 $a This book is concerned with the evaluation of natural argumentative discourse, and, in particular, with the language in which arguments are expressed. It introduces a systematic procedure for the analysis and assessment of arguments, which is designed to be a practical tool, and may be considered a pseudo-algorithm for argument evaluation. The first half of the book lays the theoretical groundwork, with a thorough examination of both the nature of language and the nature of argument. This leads to a definition of argumentation as reasoning expressed within a procedure, which itself yields the three frames of analysis used in the evaluation procedure: Process, Reasoning, and Expression. The second half begins with a detailed discussion of the concept of fallacy, with particular attention on fallacies of language, their origin and their effects. A new way of looking at fallacies emerges from these chapters, and it is that conception, together with the understanding of the nature of argumentation described in earlier sections, which ultimately provides the support for the Comprehensive Assessment Procedure for Natural Argumentation. The first two levels of this innovative procedure are outlined, while the third, that dealing with language, and involving the development of an Informal Argument Semantics, is fully described. The use of the system, and its power of analysis, are illustrated through the evaluation of a variety of examples of argumentative texts.
650 0 $a Language and languages $x Philosophy. $3 524977
650 0 $a Linguistic analysis (Linguistics) $3 598035
650 0 $a Reasoning. $3 519507
650 1 4 $a Philosophy of Language. $3 896994
650 2 4 $a Modern Philosophy. $3 896984
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of the Social Sciences. $3 894456
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a Argumentation library ; $v v.37. $3 3488253
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61694-6
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (SpringerNature-41175)