東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Political constructivism and global ...

Buckley, Michael.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Political constructivism and global justice: Rethinking international relations.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Political constructivism and global justice: Rethinking international relations./
作者:	Buckley, Michael.
面頁冊數:	236 p.
附註:	Adviser: Nicholas Fotion.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International67-03A.
標題:	Philosophy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3212337
ISBN:	9780542613012

Political constructivism and global justice: Rethinking international relations.
Buckley, Michael.

Political constructivism and global justice: Rethinking international relations. - 236 p.

Adviser: Nicholas Fotion.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Emory University, 2006.

The aim of this dissertation is to contribute to the body of work philosophers have created in the field of global justice. In particular, I provide a piece of what I anticipate to be a more philosophically satisfying theory of global justice by further developing "political constructivism." One key element of political constructivism is that it views different political subjects as calling for separate investigations in light of their special features. These features are then connected with the characteristic role and content of the principles themselves. In making this connection, political constructivism stresses the role of practical reason and, consequently, views political principles as the result of practical deliberations governed by concepts appropriate to the chosen subject. For this reason, philosophers describe political constructivism as a unique view about the development and justification of political principles, stating that the correct principles of justice are those constructed under an appropriately specified hypothetical situation.

ISBN: 9780542613012Subjects--Topical Terms:

516511
Philosophy.

Political constructivism and global justice: Rethinking international relations.
LDR:03152nam 2200301 a 45 001 965391
005 20110906
008 110906s2006 eng d
020 $a 9780542613012
035 $a (UMI)AAI3212337
035 $a AAI3212337
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Buckley, Michael. $3 1288167
245 1 0 $a Political constructivism and global justice: Rethinking international relations.
300 $a 236 p.
500 $a Adviser: Nicholas Fotion.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-03, Section: A, page: 0955.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Emory University, 2006.
520 $a The aim of this dissertation is to contribute to the body of work philosophers have created in the field of global justice. In particular, I provide a piece of what I anticipate to be a more philosophically satisfying theory of global justice by further developing "political constructivism." One key element of political constructivism is that it views different political subjects as calling for separate investigations in light of their special features. These features are then connected with the characteristic role and content of the principles themselves. In making this connection, political constructivism stresses the role of practical reason and, consequently, views political principles as the result of practical deliberations governed by concepts appropriate to the chosen subject. For this reason, philosophers describe political constructivism as a unique view about the development and justification of political principles, stating that the correct principles of justice are those constructed under an appropriately specified hypothetical situation.
520 $a Despite the success others have had in applying constructivism to issues of domestic justice, there remain serious questions challenging its viability. In particular, the objective nature of constructed principles needs further specification and a more formidable defense. A major aim of my dissertation is to provide a deeper account of this objectivity, one that can properly address an old and serious criticism, namely, that those who do not accept the procedural device have no reason to find the constructed principles objectively valid.
520 $a A second aim is to illustrate how constructivism can be applied to global justice. I do not provide a complete theory of global justice, but instead develop starting points from which a viable constructivist theory can be worked out. I accomplish this by closely examining Rawls's The Law of Peoples and evaluating it in the manner defended earlier in the dissertation. I conclude that the theory fails to meet standards required of it and, as a result, fails to be a properly justified theory of political constructivism. In the process, however, I indicate more promising ways for a constructivist to approach global justice.
590 $a School code: 0665.
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Political Science, International Law and Relations. $3 1017399
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0616
710 2 0 $a Emory University. $3 1017429
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 67-03A.
790 $a 0665
790 1 0 $a Fotion, Nicholas, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2006
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3212337