東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Efficiencies of hydrogen storage sys...

Ananthachar, Vinay Kumar.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Efficiencies of hydrogen storage systems onboard fuel cell vehicles.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Efficiencies of hydrogen storage systems onboard fuel cell vehicles./
Author:	Ananthachar, Vinay Kumar.
Description:	109 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 41-03, page: 0847.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International41-03.
Subject:	Energy. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1411281
ISBN:	0493875700

Efficiencies of hydrogen storage systems onboard fuel cell vehicles.
Ananthachar, Vinay Kumar.

Efficiencies of hydrogen storage systems onboard fuel cell vehicles. - 109 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 41-03, page: 0847.

Thesis (M.S.Eng.)--University of Massachusetts Lowell, 2002.

Energy efficiency, vehicle weight, driving range, and fuel economy are compared among fuel cell vehicles (FCV) with different types of fuel storage and battery-powered electric vehicles and Three options for onboard fuel storage are examined compared in order to evaluate the most energy efficient option of storing fuel in fuel cell vehicles: compressed hydrogen gas storage, metal hydride storage, and onboard methanol reformer derived from renewable energy. Component efficiencies are from the literature, and ADVISOR is used for mileage test simulation. The battery powered electric vehicle has the highest efficiency of conversion from solar energy as the primary source for a driving range of 300 miles as compared to compressed hydrogen gas, metal hydride and onboard methanol reformer. Among the fuel cell vehicles, the most efficient is the vehicle with onboard compressed hydrogen storage. A constant driving range of around 300 miles is considered while calculating the above energy efficiencies. The compressed gas FCV is also the leader in four other categories: vehicle weight for a given range, driving range for a given weight, efficiency starting with fossil fuel, and miles per gallon equivalent (also better than a hybrid electric) on simulated urban and highway tests.

ISBN: 0493875700Subjects--Topical Terms:

876794
Energy.

Efficiencies of hydrogen storage systems onboard fuel cell vehicles.
LDR:02173nam 2200289 a 45 001 937170
005 20110511
008 110511s2002 eng d
020 $a 0493875700
035 $a (UnM)AAI1411281
035 $a AAI1411281
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Ananthachar, Vinay Kumar. $3 1261036
245 1 0 $a Efficiencies of hydrogen storage systems onboard fuel cell vehicles.
300 $a 109 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 41-03, page: 0847.
500 $a Supervisor: John J. Duffy.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.Eng.)--University of Massachusetts Lowell, 2002.
520 $a Energy efficiency, vehicle weight, driving range, and fuel economy are compared among fuel cell vehicles (FCV) with different types of fuel storage and battery-powered electric vehicles and Three options for onboard fuel storage are examined compared in order to evaluate the most energy efficient option of storing fuel in fuel cell vehicles: compressed hydrogen gas storage, metal hydride storage, and onboard methanol reformer derived from renewable energy. Component efficiencies are from the literature, and ADVISOR is used for mileage test simulation. The battery powered electric vehicle has the highest efficiency of conversion from solar energy as the primary source for a driving range of 300 miles as compared to compressed hydrogen gas, metal hydride and onboard methanol reformer. Among the fuel cell vehicles, the most efficient is the vehicle with onboard compressed hydrogen storage. A constant driving range of around 300 miles is considered while calculating the above energy efficiencies. The compressed gas FCV is also the leader in four other categories: vehicle weight for a given range, driving range for a given weight, efficiency starting with fossil fuel, and miles per gallon equivalent (also better than a hybrid electric) on simulated urban and highway tests.
590 $a School code: 0111.
650 4 $a Energy. $3 876794
650 4 $a Engineering, Automotive. $3 1018477
650 4 $a Engineering, Mechanical. $3 783786
690 $a 0540
690 $a 0548
690 $a 0791
710 2 0 $a University of Massachusetts Lowell. $3 1017839
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 41-03.
790 $a 0111
790 1 0 $a Duffy, John J., $e advisor
791 $a M.S.Eng.
792 $a 2002
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1411281