東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Securities fraud 1996--2001: Incenti...

Temple University.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Securities fraud 1996--2001: Incentive compensation versus corporate governance.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Securities fraud 1996--2001: Incentive compensation versus corporate governance./
Author:	Wang, Ke.
Description:	191 p.
Notes:	Adviser: John Goldkamp.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International69-08A.
Subject:	Economics, General. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3326389
ISBN:	9780549776390

Securities fraud 1996--2001: Incentive compensation versus corporate governance.
Wang, Ke.

Securities fraud 1996--2001: Incentive compensation versus corporate governance. - 191 p.

Adviser: John Goldkamp.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Temple University, 2008.

This study examines the different roles that individuals and organizations play in securities fraud. It develops and tests an integrated conceptual model that combines factors at both individual and organizational levels. A longitudinal design, via hierarchical linear models, is also integrated into the model to simultaneously examine individual corporate change over time from 1996 to 2001 and to compare different corporations on average. Data were collected on a sample of 177 of the largest American companies against which securities fraud allegations were made during the study period according to the Stanford Law School Securities Class Action Clearinghouse Dataset. Fraud status for each company in each fiscal year is investigated on the basis of allegations and court decisions in motion hearing for each fraud case. Corporations' financial and governance data provide executive compensation and corporate governance information for the study. Evidence is found linking executive incentive compensation, for both individual CEOs and top executives as a group, to securities fraud. Analyses also show that a complex set of dynamics of corporate governance may play a role in fraud control. Findings vary, however, depending on the stages of judicial proceedings at which securities fraud class action cases were examined. The theoretical and policy implications of these findings are discussed.

ISBN: 9780549776390Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017424
Economics, General.

Securities fraud 1996--2001: Incentive compensation versus corporate governance.
LDR:02302nmm 2200289 a 45 001 886226
005 20101006
008 101006s2008 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549776390
035 $a (UMI)AAI3326389
035 $a AAI3326389
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Wang, Ke. $3 1057908
245 1 0 $a Securities fraud 1996--2001: Incentive compensation versus corporate governance.
300 $a 191 p.
500 $a Adviser: John Goldkamp.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-08, Section: A, page: 3334.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Temple University, 2008.
520 $a This study examines the different roles that individuals and organizations play in securities fraud. It develops and tests an integrated conceptual model that combines factors at both individual and organizational levels. A longitudinal design, via hierarchical linear models, is also integrated into the model to simultaneously examine individual corporate change over time from 1996 to 2001 and to compare different corporations on average. Data were collected on a sample of 177 of the largest American companies against which securities fraud allegations were made during the study period according to the Stanford Law School Securities Class Action Clearinghouse Dataset. Fraud status for each company in each fiscal year is investigated on the basis of allegations and court decisions in motion hearing for each fraud case. Corporations' financial and governance data provide executive compensation and corporate governance information for the study. Evidence is found linking executive incentive compensation, for both individual CEOs and top executives as a group, to securities fraud. Analyses also show that a complex set of dynamics of corporate governance may play a role in fraud control. Findings vary, however, depending on the stages of judicial proceedings at which securities fraud class action cases were examined. The theoretical and policy implications of these findings are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0225.
650 4 $a Economics, General. $3 1017424
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Sociology, Criminology and Penology. $3 1017569
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0501
690 $a 0627
710 2 $a Temple University. $3 959342
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 69-08A.
790 $a 0225
790 1 0 $a Goldkamp, John, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2008
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3326389