東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

An exploration of the differences in...

George Fox University.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An exploration of the differences in psychology faculty and graduate students' participation in mental health legislation and barriers to advocacy.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	An exploration of the differences in psychology faculty and graduate students' participation in mental health legislation and barriers to advocacy./
Author:	Gronholt, Jennifer Marie.
Description:	54 p.
Notes:	Adviser: Kathleen Gathercoal.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International70-02B.
Subject:	Education, Higher. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3347580
ISBN:	9781109031553

An exploration of the differences in psychology faculty and graduate students' participation in mental health legislation and barriers to advocacy.
Gronholt, Jennifer Marie.

An exploration of the differences in psychology faculty and graduate students' participation in mental health legislation and barriers to advocacy. - 54 p.

Adviser: Kathleen Gathercoal.

Thesis (Psy.D.)--George Fox University, 2009.

There has been limited investigation into the reasons why, despite positive attitudes toward the concept of activism, psychologists do not frequently participate in advocacy of professional issues. The purpose of this study is to explore the differences between faculty and graduate student participation in legislative advocacy and to identify the barriers to participation in advocacy in general for both faculty and graduate students. Graduate students and faculty members from psychology graduate programs affiliated with the National Council of Schools of Professional Psychology (NCSPP) were asked to participate in an email survey. Faculty members were found to participate more frequently than graduate students in nearly all advocacy activities. Certain barriers (no awareness of advocacy issues, no interest in advocacy, and no awareness of advocacy opportunities) were most significant in preventing both faculty and students from participating in advocacy. Additional barriers were significant for only students or faculty. Implications for graduate training and future research are discussed.

ISBN: 9781109031553Subjects--Topical Terms:

543175
Education, Higher.

An exploration of the differences in psychology faculty and graduate students' participation in mental health legislation and barriers to advocacy.
LDR:02107nam 2200301 a 45 001 861349
005 20100719
008 100719s2009 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109031553
035 $a (UMI)AAI3347580
035 $a AAI3347580
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Gronholt, Jennifer Marie. $3 1029045
245 1 3 $a An exploration of the differences in psychology faculty and graduate students' participation in mental health legislation and barriers to advocacy.
300 $a 54 p.
500 $a Adviser: Kathleen Gathercoal.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-02, Section: B, page: 1327.
502 $a Thesis (Psy.D.)--George Fox University, 2009.
520 $a There has been limited investigation into the reasons why, despite positive attitudes toward the concept of activism, psychologists do not frequently participate in advocacy of professional issues. The purpose of this study is to explore the differences between faculty and graduate student participation in legislative advocacy and to identify the barriers to participation in advocacy in general for both faculty and graduate students. Graduate students and faculty members from psychology graduate programs affiliated with the National Council of Schools of Professional Psychology (NCSPP) were asked to participate in an email survey. Faculty members were found to participate more frequently than graduate students in nearly all advocacy activities. Certain barriers (no awareness of advocacy issues, no interest in advocacy, and no awareness of advocacy opportunities) were most significant in preventing both faculty and students from participating in advocacy. Additional barriers were significant for only students or faculty. Implications for graduate training and future research are discussed.
590 $a School code: 1149.
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
650 4 $a Political Science, General. $3 1017391
650 4 $a Psychology, General. $3 1018034
650 4 $a Psychology, Social. $3 529430
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0745
710 2 $a George Fox University. $3 1020843
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 70-02B.
790 $a 1149
790 1 0 $a Gathercoal, Kathleen, $e advisor
791 $a Psy.D.
792 $a 2009
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3347580