東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Maternal-Foetal Conflict Issues in C...

Alsheddi, Alhanoof,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Maternal-Foetal Conflict Issues in Caesarean Section Refusal in Saudi Arabia in the Light of Saudi and Shariah Law /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Maternal-Foetal Conflict Issues in Caesarean Section Refusal in Saudi Arabia in the Light of Saudi and Shariah Law // Alhanoof Alsheddi.
作者:	Alsheddi, Alhanoof,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (333 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-07, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-07B.
標題:	Study abroad. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31824776
ISBN:	9798302373427

Maternal-Foetal Conflict Issues in Caesarean Section Refusal in Saudi Arabia in the Light of Saudi and Shariah Law /
Alsheddi, Alhanoof,

Maternal-Foetal Conflict Issues in Caesarean Section Refusal in Saudi Arabia in the Light of Saudi and Shariah Law /Alhanoof Alsheddi. - 1 electronic resource (333 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-07, Section: B.

Obstetricians may encounter challenges due to the unexpected nature of childbirth and a potential conflict of interests between the pregnant woman and her foetus. When a pregnant woman refuses to consent to a caesarean section that is necessary to prevent death to her foetus (referred to as a necessary caesarean section), the likelihood of such a conflict increases. Such a situation raises the possibility of a conflict between a pregnant woman's legal right to autonomy, which includes her right to make her own decisions regarding her childbirth and her right to refuse medical intervention, and a foetus' need to be born safely via a caesarean section and their legal right to life.This thesis examines the Saudi legal approach towards the possible maternal-foetal conflict in the context of maternal refusal of a necessary caesarean section. Saudi law grants a pregnant woman with capacity a legal right to autonomy in making her own treatment decisions, including her right to refuse a necessary caesarean section. However, the notion of autonomy in Shariah law, Saudi law's supreme law, is restricted by an individual's responsibility to comply with the Shariahprovisions. Since causing death to the foetus is prohibited under Shariahlaw (and Saudi law), the thesis explores whether the religious-based direction placed on autonomy may offer scope for overriding maternal refusal to consent to a necessary caesarean section. Saudi law gives a foetus a legal right to life and to be protected from harmful actions. In light of this, the thesis examines how far the Saudi law on maternal refusal to consent to a necessary caesarean section maintains those rights. The thesis asks whether reform of the law in this regard is needed and whether an alternative approach for dealing with the maternal-foetal potential conflict in necessary caesarean section refusal cases can be developed from within Shariahlaw, the main source of law in Saudi Arabia. Due to the shortage of literature regarding the maternal refusal of necessary caesarean sections, the thesis includes an empirical element in the form of a short questionnaire to explore how the law is implemented in practice by obstetricians/gynaecologists. The empirical study also includes the question of whether participating doctors believe that Saudi law on necessary caesarean section refusals needs to be reformed.The conclusions reached in this thesis are as follows: (i) while the notion of autonomy in Islam does not accommodate a maternal refusal of a necessary caesarean section as such a decision is considered under Shariahlaw a sinful action, the thesis does not support the argument that justifies an overriding of such a refusal decision based on the restricted notion of autonomy; (ii) the thesis argues that a foetus' legal right to life is not maintained in the current legal position of Saudi law regarding a maternal refusal of a necessary caesarean section; (iii) the thesis, hence, argues, based on doctrinal and empirical considerations, that reform of the law in this regard is needed; and (iv) the thesis shows that different approaches to the maternal refusal of a necessary caesarean section can be developed from within Shariahlaw.

English

ISBN: 9798302373427Subjects--Topical Terms:

3557623
Study abroad.

Maternal-Foetal Conflict Issues in Caesarean Section Refusal in Saudi Arabia in the Light of Saudi and Shariah Law /
LDR:04709nmm a22004813i 4500 001 2439013
005 20260727141652.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798302373427
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31824776
035 $a AAI31824776
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Alsheddi, Alhanoof, $e author. $3 3830489
245 1 0 $a Maternal-Foetal Conflict Issues in Caesarean Section Refusal in Saudi Arabia in the Light of Saudi and Shariah Law / $c Alhanoof Alsheddi.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 1 electronic resource (333 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-07, Section: B.
500 $a Advisors: Fovargue, Sara; Guy, Mary.
502 $b Ph.D. $c Lancaster University (United Kingdom) $d 2024.
520 $a Obstetricians may encounter challenges due to the unexpected nature of childbirth and a potential conflict of interests between the pregnant woman and her foetus. When a pregnant woman refuses to consent to a caesarean section that is necessary to prevent death to her foetus (referred to as a necessary caesarean section), the likelihood of such a conflict increases. Such a situation raises the possibility of a conflict between a pregnant woman's legal right to autonomy, which includes her right to make her own decisions regarding her childbirth and her right to refuse medical intervention, and a foetus' need to be born safely via a caesarean section and their legal right to life.This thesis examines the Saudi legal approach towards the possible maternal-foetal conflict in the context of maternal refusal of a necessary caesarean section. Saudi law grants a pregnant woman with capacity a legal right to autonomy in making her own treatment decisions, including her right to refuse a necessary caesarean section. However, the notion of autonomy in Shariah law, Saudi law's supreme law, is restricted by an individual's responsibility to comply with the Shariahprovisions. Since causing death to the foetus is prohibited under Shariahlaw (and Saudi law), the thesis explores whether the religious-based direction placed on autonomy may offer scope for overriding maternal refusal to consent to a necessary caesarean section. Saudi law gives a foetus a legal right to life and to be protected from harmful actions. In light of this, the thesis examines how far the Saudi law on maternal refusal to consent to a necessary caesarean section maintains those rights. The thesis asks whether reform of the law in this regard is needed and whether an alternative approach for dealing with the maternal-foetal potential conflict in necessary caesarean section refusal cases can be developed from within Shariahlaw, the main source of law in Saudi Arabia. Due to the shortage of literature regarding the maternal refusal of necessary caesarean sections, the thesis includes an empirical element in the form of a short questionnaire to explore how the law is implemented in practice by obstetricians/gynaecologists. The empirical study also includes the question of whether participating doctors believe that Saudi law on necessary caesarean section refusals needs to be reformed.The conclusions reached in this thesis are as follows: (i) while the notion of autonomy in Islam does not accommodate a maternal refusal of a necessary caesarean section as such a decision is considered under Shariahlaw a sinful action, the thesis does not support the argument that justifies an overriding of such a refusal decision based on the restricted notion of autonomy; (ii) the thesis argues that a foetus' legal right to life is not maintained in the current legal position of Saudi law regarding a maternal refusal of a necessary caesarean section; (iii) the thesis, hence, argues, based on doctrinal and empirical considerations, that reform of the law in this regard is needed; and (iv) the thesis shows that different approaches to the maternal refusal of a necessary caesarean section can be developed from within Shariahlaw.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0416
650 4 $a Study abroad. $3 3557623
650 4 $a Bodily integrity. $3 3830490
650 4 $a Womens health. $3 3562508
650 4 $a Medical ethics. $3 526828
650 4 $a Pregnancy. $3 663805
650 4 $a Cesarean section. $3 1581078
650 4 $a Religion. $3 516493
650 4 $a Bioethics. $3 558486
650 4 $a Consent. $3 3560840
650 4 $a Fetuses. $3 3696590
650 4 $a Patients. $3 1961957
650 4 $a Surgery. $3 707153
650 4 $a Islamic law. $3 587297
650 4 $a Muslims. $3 811276
650 4 $a Health care. $3 2213177
650 4 $a Obstetrics. $3 634501
650 4 $a Decision making. $3 517204
650 4 $a Well being. $3 3819377
650 4 $a Abortion. $3 818164
650 4 $a Provisions. $3 3682774
650 4 $a Health sciences. $3 3168359
650 4 $a Islamic studies. $2 bicssc $3 1082939
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Medical personnel. $2 itrt. $3 774747
650 4 $a Medicine. $3 641104
650 4 $a Middle Eastern studies. $3 3168421
650 4 $a Public health. $3 534748
690 $a 0380
690 $a 0576
690 $a 0497
690 $a 0318
690 $a 0566
690 $a 0512
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0207
690 $a 0564
690 $a 0555
690 $a 0573
710 2 $a Lancaster University (United Kingdom). $e degree granting institution. $3 3815477
720 1 $a Fovargue, Sara $e degree supervisor.
720 1 $a Guy, Mary $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-07B.
790 $a 0416
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31824776