東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Legitimacy at Sea: Expanding Conside...

Birdwell, Ian,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Legitimacy at Sea: Expanding Considerations of Sea Control /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Legitimacy at Sea: Expanding Considerations of Sea Control // Ian Birdwell.
作者:	Birdwell, Ian,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (306 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-08, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-08A.
標題:	Regional studies. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31765852
ISBN:	9798302863201

Legitimacy at Sea: Expanding Considerations of Sea Control /
Birdwell, Ian,

Legitimacy at Sea: Expanding Considerations of Sea Control /Ian Birdwell. - 1 electronic resource (306 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-08, Section: A.

Sea control has been marketed and accepted as a norm within the global commons, with a variety of states arguing for their visions of control to be viewed as legitimate. As a piece of the global commons, sea lanes are a critical enabler for the global economy and possess significant military and political significance, yet the literature revolving around ideas of sea control treats it as a military achievement at the end of a campaign and remains focused on naval power as the key mechanism for state involvement. What best explains the mechanism states use to achieve sea control, especially when considering sea control as something beyond just a military objective? This dissertation argues sea control is a norm proposed by a single state, marketed to a set of regional actors for acceptance, and then considered legitimate once a majority of states within the region accept it. This framing reshapes sea control away from a process solely of military campaigns and towards a whole-of-government effort where multiple vectors of state power are exercised in presenting the norm of that state controlling the sea lanes, ranging from economic to military to the power of state narratives. This is explored through a process-tracing analysis of the sea control endeavors pursued by the United States in the Caribbean, China in the South China Sea, and Russia in the Black Sea. Ultimately, these cases point towards legitimacy as a factor promoting stability while the powers pursuing sea control build up their military capabilities to sweep rival fleets from the regional sea, highlighting the importance of nonmilitary contributions to a final military objective.

English

ISBN: 9798302863201Subjects--Topical Terms:

3173672
Regional studies.
Subjects--Index Terms:

China

Legitimacy at Sea: Expanding Considerations of Sea Control /
LDR:03111nmm a22004693i 4500 001 2438490
005 20260727132415.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798302863201
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31765852
035 $a AAI31765852
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Birdwell, Ian, $e author. $0 (orcid)0009-0007-8477-057X $3 3829818
245 1 0 $a Legitimacy at Sea: Expanding Considerations of Sea Control / $c Ian Birdwell.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 1 electronic resource (306 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-08, Section: A.
500 $a Advisors: Maass, Richard W. Committee members: Wu, Cathy X.; Zekulic, Vlasta.
502 $b Ph.D. $c Old Dominion University $d 2024.
520 $a Sea control has been marketed and accepted as a norm within the global commons, with a variety of states arguing for their visions of control to be viewed as legitimate. As a piece of the global commons, sea lanes are a critical enabler for the global economy and possess significant military and political significance, yet the literature revolving around ideas of sea control treats it as a military achievement at the end of a campaign and remains focused on naval power as the key mechanism for state involvement. What best explains the mechanism states use to achieve sea control, especially when considering sea control as something beyond just a military objective? This dissertation argues sea control is a norm proposed by a single state, marketed to a set of regional actors for acceptance, and then considered legitimate once a majority of states within the region accept it. This framing reshapes sea control away from a process solely of military campaigns and towards a whole-of-government effort where multiple vectors of state power are exercised in presenting the norm of that state controlling the sea lanes, ranging from economic to military to the power of state narratives. This is explored through a process-tracing analysis of the sea control endeavors pursued by the United States in the Caribbean, China in the South China Sea, and Russia in the Black Sea. Ultimately, these cases point towards legitimacy as a factor promoting stability while the powers pursuing sea control build up their military capabilities to sweep rival fleets from the regional sea, highlighting the importance of nonmilitary contributions to a final military objective.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0418
650 4 $a Regional studies. $3 3173672
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a American history. $3 2122692
650 4 $a Russian history. $3 3173845
653 $a China
653 $a Naval policy
653 $a Navy
653 $a Russia
653 $a Sea control
653 $a United States
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0604
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0724
690 $a 0337
710 2 $a Old Dominion University. $b International Studies. $e degree granting institution. $3 3829819
720 1 $a Maass, Richard W. $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-08A.
790 $a 0418
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31765852