東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Comparison of Outcomes in Adolescent...

Oki, Dayton Shinta,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Comparison of Outcomes in Adolescents Treated With Aligners Versus Fixed Appliances in an Academic Setting /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Comparison of Outcomes in Adolescents Treated With Aligners Versus Fixed Appliances in an Academic Setting // Dayton Shinta Oki.
作者:	Oki, Dayton Shinta,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (34 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-10.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International86-10.
標題:	Dentistry. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31846955
ISBN:	9798310397101

Comparison of Outcomes in Adolescents Treated With Aligners Versus Fixed Appliances in an Academic Setting /
Oki, Dayton Shinta,

Comparison of Outcomes in Adolescents Treated With Aligners Versus Fixed Appliances in an Academic Setting /Dayton Shinta Oki. - 1 electronic resource (34 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-10.

Background: Adolescents are increasingly requesting and being treated with aligners, and there is a need for better information regarding treatment indications and outcomes in this population. Purpose: The aims of this study were to compare treatment efficacy and efficiency, presence and extent of new or larger white spot lesions (WSL), and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQOL) in adolescent patients treated with aligners versus fixed appliances (FA) in an academic dental clinic. Study Design: This cohort study was carried out in the University of Washington (UW) Graduate Orthodontics clinic. 29 adolescent subjects (18 male and 11 female, mean age = 14) treated with aligners and fulfilling the inclusion criteria were recruited and matched 1:1 with adolescent subjects treated with FA. Pre-treatment characteristics were collected, and subjects were contacted to complete a modified OHIP-14 questionnaire to evaluate their OHRQOL. Treatment efficacy was assessed by comparing the peer assessment rating (PAR) scores and treatment efficiency was assessed by comparing the number of emergency visits, de-bonded appliances, appointment visits, and treatment time. Presence and extent of new or larger WSLs were assessed evaluating the incisors from the digital photos using the ImageJ software. Results: The two groups had similar demographic and pre-treatment parameters, as well as post-treatment PAR scores. There was a trend for less de-bonded appliances in the aligner group (mean A = 1.0 vs. FA = 3.0 appliances; p = 0.07), but no significant difference in the treatment time. However, participants in the aligner group had significantly less treatment visits (mean A = 15.7 vs. FA = 21.3 visits; p < 0.001) and emergency visits (mean A = 0.4 vs. FA = 1.0 visits; p = 0.01). Participants in the aligner group had significantly fewer maxillary incisors with new or larger WSLs (p = 0.02), and oral hygiene counselling was provided three times less frequently (p = 0.01) compared to participants in the FA group. Lastly, the groups had similar total OHIP-14 scores, but only 26% of participants in the aligner group reported occasional interruption of meals versus 70% of participants in the FA group (p = 0.02). Conclusions: This study found both groups had similar PAR outcomes and treatment times. However, participants in the aligner group had fewer emergency visits, treatment visits, de-bonded appliances, new or larger WSLs, and interruption of meals compared to participants in the FA group.

English

ISBN: 9798310397101Subjects--Topical Terms:

828971
Dentistry.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Adolescents

Comparison of Outcomes in Adolescents Treated With Aligners Versus Fixed Appliances in an Academic Setting /
LDR:03948nmm a22004333i 4500 001 2438284
005 20251210114000.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2025 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798310397101
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31846955
035 $a AAI31846955
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Oki, Dayton Shinta, $e author. $3 3829536
245 1 0 $a Comparison of Outcomes in Adolescents Treated With Aligners Versus Fixed Appliances in an Academic Setting / $c Dayton Shinta Oki.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2025
300 $a 1 electronic resource (34 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-10.
500 $a Advisors: Huang, Greg Committee members: Randall, Cameron; Bayirli, Burcu; Mancl, Lloyd .
502 $b M.S.D.R. $c University of Washington $d 2025.
520 $a Background: Adolescents are increasingly requesting and being treated with aligners, and there is a need for better information regarding treatment indications and outcomes in this population. Purpose: The aims of this study were to compare treatment efficacy and efficiency, presence and extent of new or larger white spot lesions (WSL), and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQOL) in adolescent patients treated with aligners versus fixed appliances (FA) in an academic dental clinic. Study Design: This cohort study was carried out in the University of Washington (UW) Graduate Orthodontics clinic. 29 adolescent subjects (18 male and 11 female, mean age = 14) treated with aligners and fulfilling the inclusion criteria were recruited and matched 1:1 with adolescent subjects treated with FA. Pre-treatment characteristics were collected, and subjects were contacted to complete a modified OHIP-14 questionnaire to evaluate their OHRQOL. Treatment efficacy was assessed by comparing the peer assessment rating (PAR) scores and treatment efficiency was assessed by comparing the number of emergency visits, de-bonded appliances, appointment visits, and treatment time. Presence and extent of new or larger WSLs were assessed evaluating the incisors from the digital photos using the ImageJ software. Results: The two groups had similar demographic and pre-treatment parameters, as well as post-treatment PAR scores. There was a trend for less de-bonded appliances in the aligner group (mean A = 1.0 vs. FA = 3.0 appliances; p = 0.07), but no significant difference in the treatment time. However, participants in the aligner group had significantly less treatment visits (mean A = 15.7 vs. FA = 21.3 visits; p < 0.001) and emergency visits (mean A = 0.4 vs. FA = 1.0 visits; p = 0.01). Participants in the aligner group had significantly fewer maxillary incisors with new or larger WSLs (p = 0.02), and oral hygiene counselling was provided three times less frequently (p = 0.01) compared to participants in the FA group. Lastly, the groups had similar total OHIP-14 scores, but only 26% of participants in the aligner group reported occasional interruption of meals versus 70% of participants in the FA group (p = 0.02). Conclusions: This study found both groups had similar PAR outcomes and treatment times. However, participants in the aligner group had fewer emergency visits, treatment visits, de-bonded appliances, new or larger WSLs, and interruption of meals compared to participants in the FA group.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0250
650 4 $a Dentistry. $3 828971
650 4 $a Medicine. $3 641104
650 4 $a Health sciences. $3 3168359
653 $a Adolescents
653 $a Aligners
653 $a Fixed appliances
653 $a Outcomes
653 $a White spot lesions
690 $a 0567
690 $a 0566
690 $a 0564
710 2 $a University of Washington. $b Orthodontics. $e degree granting institution. $3 3829537
720 1 $a Huang, Greg $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 86-10.
790 $a 0250
791 $a M.S.D.R.
792 $a 2025
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31846955