東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Impact of Exposure on the Willingnes...

Addonisio, Ashley Marie,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Impact of Exposure on the Willingness to Work With Dog Breeds /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Impact of Exposure on the Willingness to Work With Dog Breeds // Ashley Marie Addonisio.
作者:	Addonisio, Ashley Marie,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (47 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-12B.
標題:	Clinical psychology. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28863985
ISBN:	9798382813707

Impact of Exposure on the Willingness to Work With Dog Breeds /
Addonisio, Ashley Marie,

Impact of Exposure on the Willingness to Work With Dog Breeds /Ashley Marie Addonisio. - 1 electronic resource (47 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: B.

In 1961, Dr. Boris Levinson's therapeutic animal work was presented to the American Psychological Association (APA), later serving as the catalysis for what is now known as animal assisted interventions (AAI) (Altschiller, 2011). However, animals were long before assisting humans physically and emotionally. Since 1961, many animals have been introduced into therapeutic settings, hospitals, schools, nursing homes, rehabilitation facilities, prisons, and more (Granger & Kogan, 2006), with dogs being the most commonly integrated animal. Addonisio (2020) found that "bad" (e.g., Pit Bull Terriers, Rottweilers, Mastiffs) and "neutral" (e.g., German Shepherd, Dalmatian) reputation dog breeds were rated significantly lower on therapeutic qualities (e.g., nonjudgmental, approachable, engaging) than "good" reputation dogs (e.g., Golden Retrievers, Labrador Retrievers). Based on the parasocial contact hypothesis (Schiappa et al., 2005), it was hypothesized that an individual's perception of a specific dog breed would become more positive with parasocial contact (i.e., indirect contact via media). To date, no study has examined the impact of a breed specific exposure on the perception of bad reputation dog breeds. A two-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was performed to examine the interaction effect of the dog breeds and exposure (IVs) on perceived therapeutic qualities and likelihood of working with a dog (DVs). An exploratory Pearson correlation coefficient matrix was conducted to evaluate the relationship between therapeutic qualities ratings and the five M5-120 personality domains. No significant interaction effect between exposure groups or breed of the dog on the combined dependent variables was found. There was a significant positive correlation between two personality domains (Openness to experiences and Agreeableness) and therapeutic qualities ratings. Further research is needed to explore potential modifications that may combat the negative perceptions of dog breeds that are often utilized in AAI.

English

ISBN: 9798382813707Subjects--Topical Terms:

524863
Clinical psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Animal assisted interventions

Impact of Exposure on the Willingness to Work With Dog Breeds /
LDR:03436nmm a22004213i 4500 001 2435568
005 20251009122829.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798382813707
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI28863985
035 $a AAI28863985
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Addonisio, Ashley Marie, $e author. $3 3825902
245 1 0 $a Impact of Exposure on the Willingness to Work With Dog Breeds / $c Ashley Marie Addonisio.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 1 electronic resource (47 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: B.
500 $a Advisors: Roth, Nathan P. Committee members: Campbell, Jonathan; Scales, W. David.
502 $b Psy.D. $c Western Carolina University $d 2024.
520 $a In 1961, Dr. Boris Levinson's therapeutic animal work was presented to the American Psychological Association (APA), later serving as the catalysis for what is now known as animal assisted interventions (AAI) (Altschiller, 2011). However, animals were long before assisting humans physically and emotionally. Since 1961, many animals have been introduced into therapeutic settings, hospitals, schools, nursing homes, rehabilitation facilities, prisons, and more (Granger & Kogan, 2006), with dogs being the most commonly integrated animal. Addonisio (2020) found that "bad" (e.g., Pit Bull Terriers, Rottweilers, Mastiffs) and "neutral" (e.g., German Shepherd, Dalmatian) reputation dog breeds were rated significantly lower on therapeutic qualities (e.g., nonjudgmental, approachable, engaging) than "good" reputation dogs (e.g., Golden Retrievers, Labrador Retrievers). Based on the parasocial contact hypothesis (Schiappa et al., 2005), it was hypothesized that an individual's perception of a specific dog breed would become more positive with parasocial contact (i.e., indirect contact via media). To date, no study has examined the impact of a breed specific exposure on the perception of bad reputation dog breeds. A two-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was performed to examine the interaction effect of the dog breeds and exposure (IVs) on perceived therapeutic qualities and likelihood of working with a dog (DVs). An exploratory Pearson correlation coefficient matrix was conducted to evaluate the relationship between therapeutic qualities ratings and the five M5-120 personality domains. No significant interaction effect between exposure groups or breed of the dog on the combined dependent variables was found. There was a significant positive correlation between two personality domains (Openness to experiences and Agreeableness) and therapeutic qualities ratings. Further research is needed to explore potential modifications that may combat the negative perceptions of dog breeds that are often utilized in AAI.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 1373
650 4 $a Clinical psychology. $3 524863
650 4 $a Animal sciences. $3 3174829
653 $a Animal assisted interventions
653 $a Dog breeds
653 $a Exposure
653 $a Perception
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0475
690 $a 0778
710 2 $a Western Carolina University. $b Psychology. $e degree granting institution. $3 3820354
720 1 $a Roth, Nathan P. $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-12B.
790 $a 1373
791 $a Psy.D.
792 $a 2024
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28863985