東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Applying Mathematics to the Natural ...

Kasirzadeh, Atoosa,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Applying Mathematics to the Natural and Social World /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Applying Mathematics to the Natural and Social World // Atoosa Kasirzadeh.
作者:	Kasirzadeh, Atoosa,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (116 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-06, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-06B.
標題:	Philosophy of science. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28768275
ISBN:	9798496550024

Applying Mathematics to the Natural and Social World /
Kasirzadeh, Atoosa,

Applying Mathematics to the Natural and Social World /Atoosa Kasirzadeh. - 1 electronic resource (116 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-06, Section: B.

My dissertation explores the roles that mathematics plays in explanations and action-guidance. In particular, I address epistemic and ethical aspects of applying mathematics in empirical and normative inquiry. In Chapter 2, I examine whether mathematical explanations can be analyzed in terms of counterfactual conditionals. I offer three challenges for such analyses and tentatively conclude against countermathematical explanations. In Chapter 3, I extend the epistemic resources of a popular framework for applying mathematics in sciences. In particular, I use two case studies from biology and physics in order to argue that this framework for applying mathematics in the empirical sciences must be complemented by a distinct role, which I name the bridging role. I show how considering the bridging role would capture mathematical practice in the sciences in a more holistic way. In Chapter 4, I investigate and compare the conditions for applying mathematics in the empirical sciences and normative inquiry. Using two case studies from fair algorithmic decisions and the allocation of scarce resources, I identify two typical sets of different conditions for the applicability of mathematics. Finally, in Chapter 5, I explore the ramifications of the arguments from Chapter 4 to a novel field of research known as Explainable Artificial Intelligence.

English

ISBN: 9798496550024Subjects--Topical Terms:

2079849
Philosophy of science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Counterfactual explanation

Applying Mathematics to the Natural and Social World /
LDR:02895nmm a22004693i 4500 001 2435567
005 20251009122829.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2021 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798496550024
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI28768275
035 $a AAI28768275
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Kasirzadeh, Atoosa, $e author. $0 (orcid)0000-0002-5967-3782 $3 3825900
245 1 0 $a Applying Mathematics to the Natural and Social World / $c Atoosa Kasirzadeh.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 1 electronic resource (116 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-06, Section: B.
500 $a Advisors: Brown, James Committee members: Huber, Franz; Miller, Michael; Berkovitz, Joseph; Strevens, Michael.
502 $b Ph.D. $c University of Toronto (Canada) $d 2021.
520 $a My dissertation explores the roles that mathematics plays in explanations and action-guidance. In particular, I address epistemic and ethical aspects of applying mathematics in empirical and normative inquiry. In Chapter 2, I examine whether mathematical explanations can be analyzed in terms of counterfactual conditionals. I offer three challenges for such analyses and tentatively conclude against countermathematical explanations. In Chapter 3, I extend the epistemic resources of a popular framework for applying mathematics in sciences. In particular, I use two case studies from biology and physics in order to argue that this framework for applying mathematics in the empirical sciences must be complemented by a distinct role, which I name the bridging role. I show how considering the bridging role would capture mathematical practice in the sciences in a more holistic way. In Chapter 4, I investigate and compare the conditions for applying mathematics in the empirical sciences and normative inquiry. Using two case studies from fair algorithmic decisions and the allocation of scarce resources, I identify two typical sets of different conditions for the applicability of mathematics. Finally, in Chapter 5, I explore the ramifications of the arguments from Chapter 4 to a novel field of research known as Explainable Artificial Intelligence.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0779
650 4 $a Philosophy of science. $2 bicssc $3 2079849
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Artificial intelligence. $3 516317
650 4 $a Applied mathematics. $3 2122814
650 4 $a Epistemology. $3 896969
650 4 $a Logic. $3 529544
650 4 $a Ethics. $3 517264
653 $a Counterfactual explanation
653 $a Explainable artificial intelligence
653 $a Mathematical explanation
653 $a Scientific explanation
690 $a 0402
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0800
690 $a 0393
690 $a 0364
690 $a 0394
690 $a 0395
710 2 $a University of Toronto (Canada). $b History and Philosophy of Science and Technology. $e degree granting institution. $3 3825901
720 1 $a Brown, James $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-06B.
790 $a 0779
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28768275