東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Breaking Insurgent Economies: State ...

Rangazas, Stephen Coia,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Breaking Insurgent Economies: State Indiscriminate Violence During Civil War /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Breaking Insurgent Economies: State Indiscriminate Violence During Civil War // Stephen Coia Rangazas.
作者:	Rangazas, Stephen Coia,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (521 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 87-03, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International87-03A.
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=32238340
ISBN:	9798293803293

Breaking Insurgent Economies: State Indiscriminate Violence During Civil War /
Rangazas, Stephen Coia,

Breaking Insurgent Economies: State Indiscriminate Violence During Civil War /Stephen Coia Rangazas. - 1 electronic resource (521 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 87-03, Section: A.

State indiscriminate violence against civilians remains a tragically common feature of civil wars. Beyond direct fatalities, such violence also contributes to widespread civilian suffering through mass displacement, famine, and economic devastation. This dissertation seeks to address two key questions on states' use of indiscriminate violence. First, why do states target civilians with indiscriminate violence during civil wars? Second, why does indiscriminate violence against civilians weaken some insurgencies but strengthen others? Prominent works on civilian victimization emphasize a punitive logic of indiscriminate violence where states seek to coerce civilians into altering their behavior. Instead, this dissertation argues that state violence often follows an economic logic that aims to exhaust insurgent opponents by disrupting the economy of insurgent-controlled areas. States use indiscriminate violence to deprive civilians the ability to support the insurgency rather than dissuade them from doing so. Further, in contrast to the conventional wisdom which argues indiscriminate violence counterproductively strengthens insurgencies, I argue that the effectiveness of indiscriminate violence depends on the logic of violence used, punitive or economic, and the level of insurgent territorial control in the targeted area. Punitive violence is counterproductive, particularly when used in contested areas. However, I conclude that economic violence targeting insurgent-controlled areas effectively weakens insurgencies.To examines these questions, the dissertation's empirical strategy begins with three chapters on the Vietnam War. Using quantitative and qualitative archival data, I investigate the effects of several different indiscriminate violence strategies including forced resettlement, chemical crop destruction, bombing, and collective punishments. To address the broader generalizability outside of the Vietnam case, the dissertation then identifies the use of indiscriminate violence strategies by state forces during all major insurgencies in Southeast Asia between 1825-2025. Finally, the dissertation explores the broader generalizability of the theory of effectiveness with three other case studies of foreign intervention in Asia: Japanese in China (1937-1945), French in Indochina (1945- 1954), and Soviets in Afghanistan (1979-1989). I conclude by discussing implications for the political violence literature, policy alternatives to economic violence, and approaches for mitigating the effects of economic violence on civilians.

English

ISBN: 9798293803293Subjects--Topical Terms:

528916
Political science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Civil wars

Breaking Insurgent Economies: State Indiscriminate Violence During Civil War /
LDR:04006nmm a22004333i 4500 001 2435559
005 20251009101021.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2025 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798293803293
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI32238340
035 $a AAI32238340
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Rangazas, Stephen Coia, $e author. $0 (orcid)0000-0002-8895-7178 $3 3825889
245 1 0 $a Breaking Insurgent Economies: State Indiscriminate Violence During Civil War / $c Stephen Coia Rangazas.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2025
300 $a 1 electronic resource (521 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 87-03, Section: A.
500 $a Advisors: Downes, Alexander Committee members: Lewis, Janet; Miller, Michael.
502 $b Ph.D. $c The George Washington University $d 2025.
520 $a State indiscriminate violence against civilians remains a tragically common feature of civil wars. Beyond direct fatalities, such violence also contributes to widespread civilian suffering through mass displacement, famine, and economic devastation. This dissertation seeks to address two key questions on states' use of indiscriminate violence. First, why do states target civilians with indiscriminate violence during civil wars? Second, why does indiscriminate violence against civilians weaken some insurgencies but strengthen others? Prominent works on civilian victimization emphasize a punitive logic of indiscriminate violence where states seek to coerce civilians into altering their behavior. Instead, this dissertation argues that state violence often follows an economic logic that aims to exhaust insurgent opponents by disrupting the economy of insurgent-controlled areas. States use indiscriminate violence to deprive civilians the ability to support the insurgency rather than dissuade them from doing so. Further, in contrast to the conventional wisdom which argues indiscriminate violence counterproductively strengthens insurgencies, I argue that the effectiveness of indiscriminate violence depends on the logic of violence used, punitive or economic, and the level of insurgent territorial control in the targeted area. Punitive violence is counterproductive, particularly when used in contested areas. However, I conclude that economic violence targeting insurgent-controlled areas effectively weakens insurgencies.To examines these questions, the dissertation's empirical strategy begins with three chapters on the Vietnam War. Using quantitative and qualitative archival data, I investigate the effects of several different indiscriminate violence strategies including forced resettlement, chemical crop destruction, bombing, and collective punishments. To address the broader generalizability outside of the Vietnam case, the dissertation then identifies the use of indiscriminate violence strategies by state forces during all major insurgencies in Southeast Asia between 1825-2025. Finally, the dissertation explores the broader generalizability of the theory of effectiveness with three other case studies of foreign intervention in Asia: Japanese in China (1937-1945), French in Indochina (1945- 1954), and Soviets in Afghanistan (1979-1989). I conclude by discussing implications for the political violence literature, policy alternatives to economic violence, and approaches for mitigating the effects of economic violence on civilians.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0075
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Southeast Asian studies. $3 3344898
653 $a Civil wars
653 $a Counterinsurgency
653 $a Indiscriminate violence
653 $a Insurgency
653 $a Vietnam War
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0222
710 2 $a The George Washington University. $b Political Science. $e degree granting institution. $3 3825890
720 1 $a Downes, Alexander $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 87-03A.
790 $a 0075
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2025
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=32238340