東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Scope dependency in English and Chin...

Liu, Feng-hsi,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Scope dependency in English and Chinese /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Scope dependency in English and Chinese // Feng-hsi Liu.
作者:	Liu, Feng-hsi,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (228 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 52-06, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International52-06A.
標題:	Linguistics. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9033994
ISBN:	9798207285054

Scope dependency in English and Chinese /
Liu, Feng-hsi,

Scope dependency in English and Chinese /Feng-hsi Liu. - 1 electronic resource (228 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 52-06, Section: A.

This thesis studies scope dependency among NPs in English and Chinese. I address the following issues. First, I examine basic transitive sentences in English and I show that contrary to what is generally assumed in the literature, scope ambiguity is only possible in limited environments and its availability depends on the choice of NPs. I then divide NPs into generalized specific (G-specific) and non-specific NPs, in terms of how they relate to other NPs with respect to scope. The central proposal of the thesis, then, is that this classification of NPs plays an important role in natural languages. It is not only essential in specifying scope relations but also relevant in other areas of syntax and semantics. Thus I show that the branching reading is available when G-specific NPs are involved. Further, there is evidence suggesting that this generalization holds cross-linguistically as well. I then show that G-specificity solves two descriptive problems in Chinese syntax. First, it makes precise the old observation that subjects in Chinese tend to be definite. I suggest that this tendency be strengthened as a restriction on determiners: subject NP determiners must be G-specific. In addition, the generalization so stated allows no exceptions. Second, I show that the NPs that can be quantified by the universal quantifier dou are precisely ones that are G-specific. Finally, I argue that G-specificity offers an account of the subject/object asymmetry observed in wh/quantifier interactions. I show that the asymmetry is found in multiple quantification as well. I then compare the proposed analysis with the QR approach advocated by May. I argue that the QR approach cannot be made to work because it relies on the questionable assumption that scope is purely a structural phenomenon and that scope interpretation is determined at LF.

English

ISBN: 9798207285054Subjects--Topical Terms:

524476
Linguistics.

Scope dependency in English and Chinese /
LDR:03102nmm a22003853i 4500 001 2435354
005 20251001074920.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s1990 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798207285054
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI9033994
035 $a AAI9033994
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Liu, Feng-hsi, $e author. $3 3825644
245 1 0 $a Scope dependency in English and Chinese / $c Feng-hsi Liu.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 1990
300 $a 1 electronic resource (228 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 52-06, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisors: Keenan, Edward L.
502 $b Ph.D. $c University of California, Los Angeles $d 1990.
520 $a This thesis studies scope dependency among NPs in English and Chinese. I address the following issues. First, I examine basic transitive sentences in English and I show that contrary to what is generally assumed in the literature, scope ambiguity is only possible in limited environments and its availability depends on the choice of NPs. I then divide NPs into generalized specific (G-specific) and non-specific NPs, in terms of how they relate to other NPs with respect to scope. The central proposal of the thesis, then, is that this classification of NPs plays an important role in natural languages. It is not only essential in specifying scope relations but also relevant in other areas of syntax and semantics. Thus I show that the branching reading is available when G-specific NPs are involved. Further, there is evidence suggesting that this generalization holds cross-linguistically as well. I then show that G-specificity solves two descriptive problems in Chinese syntax. First, it makes precise the old observation that subjects in Chinese tend to be definite. I suggest that this tendency be strengthened as a restriction on determiners: subject NP determiners must be G-specific. In addition, the generalization so stated allows no exceptions. Second, I show that the NPs that can be quantified by the universal quantifier dou are precisely ones that are G-specific. Finally, I argue that G-specificity offers an account of the subject/object asymmetry observed in wh/quantifier interactions. I show that the asymmetry is found in multiple quantification as well. I then compare the proposed analysis with the QR approach advocated by May. I argue that the QR approach cannot be made to work because it relies on the questionable assumption that scope is purely a structural phenomenon and that scope interpretation is determined at LF.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0031
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
650 4 $a Language. $3 643551
650 4 $a Modern language. $3 3174390
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0291
690 $a 0679
710 2 $a University of California, Los Angeles. $e degree granting institution. $3 3765958
720 1 $a Keenan, Edward L. $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 52-06A.
790 $a 0031
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1990
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9033994