語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
到查詢結果
[ null ]
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
A Cognitive Approach to Investigatin...
~
Yang, Haoran,
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
A Cognitive Approach to Investigating Two-Plus-Two Constructions in Chinese Four-Character Idioms /
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
A Cognitive Approach to Investigating Two-Plus-Two Constructions in Chinese Four-Character Idioms // Haoran Yang.
作者:
Yang, Haoran,
面頁冊數:
1 electronic resource (167 pages)
附註:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-06, Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International85-06A.
標題:
Grammar. -
電子資源:
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30728126
ISBN:
9798381021493
A Cognitive Approach to Investigating Two-Plus-Two Constructions in Chinese Four-Character Idioms /
Yang, Haoran,
A Cognitive Approach to Investigating Two-Plus-Two Constructions in Chinese Four-Character Idioms /
Haoran Yang. - 1 electronic resource (167 pages)
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-06, Section: A.
Chinese idioms comprise word strings of various lengths, ranging from three to eight characters (Luo, 2015). Four-character idioms (FCIs) constitute the largest group among all Chinese idioms. Different syntactic patterns have been identified among FCIs, namely, 1+1+1+1, 1+3, and 2+2, whereby each digit stands for the number of characters that constitute a syntactic unit. Among these, the 2+2 construction (henceforth, AABB) is found to be most widely distributed (Wang et al. 2013). Two types of 2+2 FCIs have been identified in the present study: (a) interchangeable 2+2 FCIs whose two units can replace each other (i.e., AABB or BBAA) and (b) non-interchangeable 2+2 FCIs whose two units cannot substitute each other (i.e., only AABB but not BBAA). For instance, 黑白混淆 (hei-bai-hun-xiao: black-white-mix-confuse, "to garble things up like mixing black and white colours together") can be re-constructed as 混淆黑白 (hun-xiao-hei-bai, mix-confuse-black-white), but 做贼心虚 (zuo-zei-xin-xu, become-thief-heart-empty, "to feel guilty like a thief having stolen something") cannot be re-constructed as 心虚做贼 (xin-xu-zuo-zei, heart-empty-become-thief).Prior studies (Chen 2001; Su 2002; Tao 2002; Zuo 2006; Nall 2008) have identified combinatory relationships in FCIs from a Construction Grammar perspective (Goldberg 1995, 2006). However, none has provided an in-depth diachronic account of the differences between interchangeable and non-interchangeable 2+2 FCIs in terms of internal constituency and propositional act functions (Croft, 2001). Similarly, structural mismatches between AABB and BBAA constructions in interchangeable FCIs have also not been adequately addressed in the literature. Finally, not much attention has been given to the partly schematic negative 2+2 construction [不 (bu, not) A 不 (bu, not) B] in terms of its functions.This thesis contains 8 chapters. Chapter 1 is the introduction which explains the aims and scope of this study. Chapter 2 is the literature review providing a description of idioms and idiomaticity. In particular, it deals with the basic concepts of Chinese idioms' classification and the research motivation for the Chinese FCIs. Chapter 3 is the literature review about the Construction Grammar and explains how construction grammar can be applied to Chinese FCI research. Chapter 4 is devoted to data collection and methodology. Chapter 5 makes a comparison between interchangeable and non-interchangeable 2+2 FCIs, while Chapter 6 is centred on AABB and BBAA patterns of interchangeable FCIs. Chapter 7 gives an account of the 2+2 [bu A bu B] construction in terms of internal constituency, propositional act function, and semantic prosody. Finally, chapter 8 is for the findings and conclusion.The present thesis argues that the internal constituency of Chinese 2+2 FCIs may affect their propositional act functions (cf. Croft 2001) in context and further lead a diachronic differentiation of interchangeable idioms vs non-interchangeable idioms. The former will appear to follow a directional path of constructional change, while the latter a non-directional one. This research also shows that three different mechanisms (attraction, differentiation, and substitution) may dictate the diachronic change between AABB and BBAA. This work aims to make a valuable contribution to the study of FCI constructions as it sets to explain (a) how interchangeable and non-interchangeable idioms evolve over time and (b) how the 2+2 [bu A bu B] construction shows a different behaviour than the general 2+2 constructions in terms of internal constituency, propositional act functions, and semantic prosody.
English
ISBN: 9798381021493Subjects--Topical Terms:
899712
Grammar.
A Cognitive Approach to Investigating Two-Plus-Two Constructions in Chinese Four-Character Idioms /
LDR
:04967nmm a22003853i 4500
001
2435276
005
20251001074904.5
006
m o d
007
cr|nu||||||||
008
261011s2022 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020
$a
9798381021493
035
$a
(MiAaPQD)AAI30728126
035
$a
(MiAaPQD)Lancaster_201576
035
$a
AAI30728126
040
$a
MiAaPQD
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQD
$e
rda
100
1
$a
Yang, Haoran,
$e
author.
$3
3825533
245
1 2
$a
A Cognitive Approach to Investigating Two-Plus-Two Constructions in Chinese Four-Character Idioms /
$c
Haoran Yang.
264
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2022
300
$a
1 electronic resource (167 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-06, Section: A.
500
$a
Advisors: Tantucci, Vittorio.
502
$b
Ph.D.
$c
Lancaster University (United Kingdom)
$d
2022.
520
$a
Chinese idioms comprise word strings of various lengths, ranging from three to eight characters (Luo, 2015). Four-character idioms (FCIs) constitute the largest group among all Chinese idioms. Different syntactic patterns have been identified among FCIs, namely, 1+1+1+1, 1+3, and 2+2, whereby each digit stands for the number of characters that constitute a syntactic unit. Among these, the 2+2 construction (henceforth, AABB) is found to be most widely distributed (Wang et al. 2013). Two types of 2+2 FCIs have been identified in the present study: (a) interchangeable 2+2 FCIs whose two units can replace each other (i.e., AABB or BBAA) and (b) non-interchangeable 2+2 FCIs whose two units cannot substitute each other (i.e., only AABB but not BBAA). For instance, 黑白混淆 (hei-bai-hun-xiao: black-white-mix-confuse, "to garble things up like mixing black and white colours together") can be re-constructed as 混淆黑白 (hun-xiao-hei-bai, mix-confuse-black-white), but 做贼心虚 (zuo-zei-xin-xu, become-thief-heart-empty, "to feel guilty like a thief having stolen something") cannot be re-constructed as 心虚做贼 (xin-xu-zuo-zei, heart-empty-become-thief).Prior studies (Chen 2001; Su 2002; Tao 2002; Zuo 2006; Nall 2008) have identified combinatory relationships in FCIs from a Construction Grammar perspective (Goldberg 1995, 2006). However, none has provided an in-depth diachronic account of the differences between interchangeable and non-interchangeable 2+2 FCIs in terms of internal constituency and propositional act functions (Croft, 2001). Similarly, structural mismatches between AABB and BBAA constructions in interchangeable FCIs have also not been adequately addressed in the literature. Finally, not much attention has been given to the partly schematic negative 2+2 construction [不 (bu, not) A 不 (bu, not) B] in terms of its functions.This thesis contains 8 chapters. Chapter 1 is the introduction which explains the aims and scope of this study. Chapter 2 is the literature review providing a description of idioms and idiomaticity. In particular, it deals with the basic concepts of Chinese idioms' classification and the research motivation for the Chinese FCIs. Chapter 3 is the literature review about the Construction Grammar and explains how construction grammar can be applied to Chinese FCI research. Chapter 4 is devoted to data collection and methodology. Chapter 5 makes a comparison between interchangeable and non-interchangeable 2+2 FCIs, while Chapter 6 is centred on AABB and BBAA patterns of interchangeable FCIs. Chapter 7 gives an account of the 2+2 [bu A bu B] construction in terms of internal constituency, propositional act function, and semantic prosody. Finally, chapter 8 is for the findings and conclusion.The present thesis argues that the internal constituency of Chinese 2+2 FCIs may affect their propositional act functions (cf. Croft 2001) in context and further lead a diachronic differentiation of interchangeable idioms vs non-interchangeable idioms. The former will appear to follow a directional path of constructional change, while the latter a non-directional one. This research also shows that three different mechanisms (attraction, differentiation, and substitution) may dictate the diachronic change between AABB and BBAA. This work aims to make a valuable contribution to the study of FCI constructions as it sets to explain (a) how interchangeable and non-interchangeable idioms evolve over time and (b) how the 2+2 [bu A bu B] construction shows a different behaviour than the general 2+2 constructions in terms of internal constituency, propositional act functions, and semantic prosody.
546
$a
English
590
$a
School code: 0416
650
4
$a
Grammar.
$3
899712
650
4
$a
Linguistics.
$3
524476
650
4
$a
Chinese languages.
$3
3560871
650
4
$a
Semantics.
$3
520060
650
4
$a
Literacy.
$3
528342
650
4
$a
Language.
$3
643551
650
4
$a
Logic.
$3
529544
690
$a
0290
690
$a
0679
690
$a
0395
710
2
$a
Lancaster University (United Kingdom).
$e
degree granting institution.
$3
3815477
720
1
$a
Tantucci, Vittorio
$e
degree supervisor.
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
85-06A.
790
$a
0416
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2022
856
4 0
$u
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30728126
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9530971
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入
(1)帳號:一般為「身分證號」;外籍生或交換生則為「學號」。 (2)密碼:預設為帳號末四碼。
帳號
.
密碼
.
請在此電腦上記得個人資料
取消
忘記密碼? (請注意!您必須已在系統登記E-mail信箱方能使用。)