東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A comparison of state funding formul...

Rooth, Rose Marie Correa,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A comparison of state funding formulas for pupil transportation in Arizona /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A comparison of state funding formulas for pupil transportation in Arizona // Rose Marie Correa Rooth.
作者:	Rooth, Rose Marie Correa,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (197 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 54-09, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International54-09A.
標題:	School finance. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9307133
ISBN:	9798208120859

A comparison of state funding formulas for pupil transportation in Arizona /
Rooth, Rose Marie Correa,

A comparison of state funding formulas for pupil transportation in Arizona /Rose Marie Correa Rooth. - 1 electronic resource (197 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 54-09, Section: A.

This study focused on developing and evaluating alternative state aid plans for the financing of public pupil transportation in Arizona. It identified four methodologies as currently being in use in other states to fund transportation. They were: full state funding, flat grant funding, shared expenditure, and formula. The study identified and simulated five alternative state aid programs for Arizona school districts. The four options chosen as being representative of the plans in place nationally were: full state funding, flat grant plan, actual or approved expenditure, and the modified Arizona plan. To these was added the present Arizona plan. The distribution of funding of these alternatives was compared on a percentage basis according to type, size, property wealth, and geographic classification. An evaluation of the efficacy of the alternatives using seven evaluation criteria scored the actual or approved expenditure plan and the modified Arizona plan highest. The first plan met the criterion of efficiency, simplicity, objectivity, and non-manipulability and partially met the criteria of student equity and adequacy. The modified Arizona plan met the criterion of taxpayer equity, efficiency, simplicity, objectivity, and non-manipulability. The most beneficial feature of both these plans was their encouragement of cost containment.

English

ISBN: 9798208120859Subjects--Topical Terms:

3765455
School finance.
Subjects--Index Terms:

transportation funding

A comparison of state funding formulas for pupil transportation in Arizona /
LDR:02703nmm a22003853i 4500 001 2434416
005 20251027113109.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s1992 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798208120859
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI9307133
035 $a AAI9307133
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Rooth, Rose Marie Correa, $e author. $3 3824397
245 1 2 $a A comparison of state funding formulas for pupil transportation in Arizona / $c Rose Marie Correa Rooth.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 1992
300 $a 1 electronic resource (197 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 54-09, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisors: Jordan, K. Forbis; Metos, Thomas H.
502 $b Ed.D. $c Arizona State University $d 1992.
520 $a This study focused on developing and evaluating alternative state aid plans for the financing of public pupil transportation in Arizona. It identified four methodologies as currently being in use in other states to fund transportation. They were: full state funding, flat grant funding, shared expenditure, and formula. The study identified and simulated five alternative state aid programs for Arizona school districts. The four options chosen as being representative of the plans in place nationally were: full state funding, flat grant plan, actual or approved expenditure, and the modified Arizona plan. To these was added the present Arizona plan. The distribution of funding of these alternatives was compared on a percentage basis according to type, size, property wealth, and geographic classification. An evaluation of the efficacy of the alternatives using seven evaluation criteria scored the actual or approved expenditure plan and the modified Arizona plan highest. The first plan met the criterion of efficiency, simplicity, objectivity, and non-manipulability and partially met the criteria of student equity and adequacy. The modified Arizona plan met the criterion of taxpayer equity, efficiency, simplicity, objectivity, and non-manipulability. The most beneficial feature of both these plans was their encouragement of cost containment.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0010
650 4 $a School finance. $3 3765455
650 4 $a Education finance. $3 3172165
653 $a transportation funding
690 $a 0277
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $e degree granting institution. $3 3818054
720 1 $a Jordan, K. Forbis $e degree supervisor.
720 1 $a Metos, Thomas H. $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 54-09A.
790 $a 0010
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 1992
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9307133