東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Cephalometric Analysis of Deep Bite ...

Brenner, Ross Charles,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Cephalometric Analysis of Deep Bite Correction in Patients Treated with Invisalign /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Cephalometric Analysis of Deep Bite Correction in Patients Treated with Invisalign // Ross Charles Brenner.
作者:	Brenner, Ross Charles,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (54 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-02.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International81-02.
標題:	Dentistry. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13421711
ISBN:	9781085577601

Cephalometric Analysis of Deep Bite Correction in Patients Treated with Invisalign /
Brenner, Ross Charles,

Cephalometric Analysis of Deep Bite Correction in Patients Treated with Invisalign /Ross Charles Brenner. - 1 electronic resource (54 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-02.

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of deep bite correction and evaluate the correction through cephalometric analysis.Methods: A sample of 32 consecutively treated, deep bite malocclusion patients, fitting a certain inclusion criteria and treated using Invisalign, were selected from the archives of the Department of Orthodontics, Saint Louis University. The average age of the population was 29 ± 13.28 years old and included 21 females and 11 males. The presence of bite turbos, initial overbite and projected overbite were recorded from the initial ClinCheck. Pre- and post-treatment cephalograms were evaluated.Results: Paired T-tests were used to evaluate treatment effects. Mean decrease in overbite was 1.22 ± 0.95 mm (p<0.05), mean increase in IMPA was 3.22 ± 4.03 degrees (p<0.05) and mean molar extrusion was 0.60 ± 1.10 mm (p<0.05) for the entire sample. Actual change in overbite was 51.9% of the projected change in overbite. No statistically significant differences were noted between overcorrected and non-overcorrected groups or bite ramps and non-bite ramp groups.Conclusion: Deep bite malocclusions are difficult to treat with Invisalign, and actual correction falls 50% short of projected. It appears that most of the correction comes from incisor proclination and mandibular molar extrusion. The presence of bite ramps or overcorrection in the initial ClinCheck did not seem to have any effect on overbite correction.

English

ISBN: 9781085577601Subjects--Topical Terms:

828971
Dentistry.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Deep bite corrections

Cephalometric Analysis of Deep Bite Correction in Patients Treated with Invisalign /
LDR:02754nmm a22003733i 4500 001 2433879
005 20250909080243.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2019 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9781085577601
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI13421711
035 $a AAI13421711
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Brenner, Ross Charles, $e author. $3 3823656
245 1 0 $a Cephalometric Analysis of Deep Bite Correction in Patients Treated with Invisalign / $c Ross Charles Brenner.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 1 electronic resource (54 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-02.
500 $a Advisors: Kim, Ki B. Committee members: Bankhead, Brent; Foley, Patrick.
502 $b M.S.D.R. $c Saint Louis University $d 2019.
520 $a Introduction: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of deep bite correction and evaluate the correction through cephalometric analysis.Methods: A sample of 32 consecutively treated, deep bite malocclusion patients, fitting a certain inclusion criteria and treated using Invisalign, were selected from the archives of the Department of Orthodontics, Saint Louis University. The average age of the population was 29 ± 13.28 years old and included 21 females and 11 males. The presence of bite turbos, initial overbite and projected overbite were recorded from the initial ClinCheck. Pre- and post-treatment cephalograms were evaluated.Results: Paired T-tests were used to evaluate treatment effects. Mean decrease in overbite was 1.22 ± 0.95 mm (p<0.05), mean increase in IMPA was 3.22 ± 4.03 degrees (p<0.05) and mean molar extrusion was 0.60 ± 1.10 mm (p<0.05) for the entire sample. Actual change in overbite was 51.9% of the projected change in overbite. No statistically significant differences were noted between overcorrected and non-overcorrected groups or bite ramps and non-bite ramp groups.Conclusion: Deep bite malocclusions are difficult to treat with Invisalign, and actual correction falls 50% short of projected. It appears that most of the correction comes from incisor proclination and mandibular molar extrusion. The presence of bite ramps or overcorrection in the initial ClinCheck did not seem to have any effect on overbite correction.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0193
650 4 $a Dentistry. $3 828971
653 $a Deep bite corrections
653 $a Cephalometric analysis
690 $a 0567
710 2 $a Saint Louis University. $b Orthodontics. $e degree granting institution. $3 3823657
720 1 $a Kim, Ki B. $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 81-02.
790 $a 0193
791 $a M.S.D.R.
792 $a 2019
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13421711