東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

An Examination of Emergency Manageme...

Weber, Jaeson Andrew,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An Examination of Emergency Management Programs in the Florida College System and State University System /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An Examination of Emergency Management Programs in the Florida College System and State University System // Jaeson Andrew Weber.
作者:	Weber, Jaeson Andrew,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (199 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-07, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-07A.
標題:	Educational leadership. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31637592
ISBN:	9798346887591

An Examination of Emergency Management Programs in the Florida College System and State University System /
Weber, Jaeson Andrew,

An Examination of Emergency Management Programs in the Florida College System and State University System /Jaeson Andrew Weber. - 1 electronic resource (199 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-07, Section: A.

This study addressed gaps in research on understanding the preparedness status of emergency management programs within Florida College System (FCS) and State University System (SUS) institutions. The quantitative assessment involved 21 institutions (51% response rate).A survey instrument was developed from prior studies and measured programmatic factors. These questions explored the current preparedness level regarding emergency management programs within Florida's FCS and SUS institutions, the involvement of stakeholders in these programs, the perceived preparedness to respond to various hazards, the extent of institutional investment in emergency management efforts, and the organizational frameworks characterizing the emergency management departments or units within these institutions.Findings revealed that FCS institutions generally have needs, particularly in exercises and financial resources, suggesting foundational elements are present but highlighting opportunities to advance their preparedness. In contrast, SUS institutions report needs in planning and financial support, emphasizing the necessity of comprehensive and updated emergency strategies and plans and sufficient funding as programs advance. Both systems displayed strong leadership commitment that supported their levels of preparedness.Stakeholder involvement varied, with substantial participation from internal stakeholders like Police/Public Safety, while others, such as International Student Services, were moderately engaged, showing opportunities for more expansive involvement. External stakeholders, including local, county, and state partners, were heavily involved, highlighting the importance of collaboration, relationships, and support.Institutions prioritized hazards based on likelihood and impact, especially in Florida, focusing on high-priority areas such as tropical cyclones, infectious diseases, and active threats. Organizational structures and frameworks differed, with SUS institutions generally having more formalized structures, including dedicated departments, than the less formalized structures in FCS. There were notable disparities in resources, staffing levels, budgets, and the use of digital platforms.Overall, the study identified a moderate degree of preparedness and strong foundational underpinnings to SUS and FCS emergency management programs, where strengths and areas for improvement are highlighted to enhance preparedness and resilience.

English

ISBN: 9798346887591Subjects--Topical Terms:

529436
Educational leadership.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Continuity

An Examination of Emergency Management Programs in the Florida College System and State University System /
LDR:03962nmm a22004573i 4500 001 2433030
005 20250818063913.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798346887591
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31637592
035 $a AAI31637592
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Weber, Jaeson Andrew, $e author. $3 3822475
245 1 3 $a An Examination of Emergency Management Programs in the Florida College System and State University System / $c Jaeson Andrew Weber.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 1 electronic resource (199 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-07, Section: A.
500 $a Advisors: Floyd, Deborah Committee members: Lieberman, Mary; Ramdin, Gianna; Faerman, Larry.
502 $b Ph.D. $c Florida Atlantic University $d 2024.
520 $a This study addressed gaps in research on understanding the preparedness status of emergency management programs within Florida College System (FCS) and State University System (SUS) institutions. The quantitative assessment involved 21 institutions (51% response rate).A survey instrument was developed from prior studies and measured programmatic factors. These questions explored the current preparedness level regarding emergency management programs within Florida's FCS and SUS institutions, the involvement of stakeholders in these programs, the perceived preparedness to respond to various hazards, the extent of institutional investment in emergency management efforts, and the organizational frameworks characterizing the emergency management departments or units within these institutions.Findings revealed that FCS institutions generally have needs, particularly in exercises and financial resources, suggesting foundational elements are present but highlighting opportunities to advance their preparedness. In contrast, SUS institutions report needs in planning and financial support, emphasizing the necessity of comprehensive and updated emergency strategies and plans and sufficient funding as programs advance. Both systems displayed strong leadership commitment that supported their levels of preparedness.Stakeholder involvement varied, with substantial participation from internal stakeholders like Police/Public Safety, while others, such as International Student Services, were moderately engaged, showing opportunities for more expansive involvement. External stakeholders, including local, county, and state partners, were heavily involved, highlighting the importance of collaboration, relationships, and support.Institutions prioritized hazards based on likelihood and impact, especially in Florida, focusing on high-priority areas such as tropical cyclones, infectious diseases, and active threats. Organizational structures and frameworks differed, with SUS institutions generally having more formalized structures, including dedicated departments, than the less formalized structures in FCS. There were notable disparities in resources, staffing levels, budgets, and the use of digital platforms.Overall, the study identified a moderate degree of preparedness and strong foundational underpinnings to SUS and FCS emergency management programs, where strengths and areas for improvement are highlighted to enhance preparedness and resilience.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0119
650 4 $a Educational leadership. $3 529436
650 4 $a Community college education. $3 2122836
650 4 $a Education policy. $3 2191387
650 4 $a Higher education administration. $3 2122863
653 $a Continuity
653 $a Crisis
653 $a Disaster
653 $a Emergency
653 $a Preparedness
653 $a Resilience
690 $a 0449
690 $a 0275
690 $a 0446
690 $a 0458
710 2 $a Florida Atlantic University. $b Educational Leadership. $e degree granting institution. $3 3822476
720 1 $a Floyd, Deborah $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-07A.
790 $a 0119
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31637592