東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Power, Knowledge and Subjectivity in...

Shakaa, Rana N. W.,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Power, Knowledge and Subjectivity in the Making of Public Art: The City of Sydney Case /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Power, Knowledge and Subjectivity in the Making of Public Art: The City of Sydney Case // Rana N. W Shakaa.
作者:	Shakaa, Rana N. W.,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (294 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-08, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-08A.
標題:	Institutionalization. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31864108
ISBN:	9798302899859

Power, Knowledge and Subjectivity in the Making of Public Art: The City of Sydney Case /
Shakaa, Rana N. W.,

Power, Knowledge and Subjectivity in the Making of Public Art: The City of Sydney Case /Rana N. W Shakaa. - 1 electronic resource (294 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-08, Section: A.

Institutionalized public art has been contested by art historians and critics. The central issue of institutionalized public art is its production within bureaucratic conditions under which its production is influenced by a disciplinary model of power that dictates how art is created. This study aimed to interrogate the assumption that public art is predetermined by its own bureaucracies through an examination of institutionalized public art defined as public art commissioned by a local government. The study focused on public art making by examining the practices of the multiple subjects involved in its production, each with their own way of doing and thinking about public art. The subjects' practices were conceptualized as another emerging power model with the potential to cultivate new terms of public art practices and outcomes, and thereby implications for the future production of public art.The theoretical and methodological constructs of the study were guided by Michel Foucault's concepts of power, knowledge and subjectivity. Through interviews and documentation analysis, the public art making process in the City of Sydney was examined in three different urban renewal sites. For each case, the research uncovered (1) the strategic directions attributed to making public art, (2) the institutional arrangements established by the local government to realize the strategic directions, and (3) the practices and knowledge of the subjects involved in the process of making public art, which offer insights into subjective-led practices of making.The study conceptualized the process of making public art as a discursive domain that involves a myriad of institutional and subjective practices. In doing so, the research not only underlined issues surrounding the institutionalization of public art but also the benefits of this institutionalization in opening channels for experimenting and exploring new practices and knowledge in the public domain of city spaces. To realize this potential, the research argued for the need to allow for flexibility and freedom within the public art making process. Furthermore, the researcher invites the subjects involved in the process of making public art, including researchers conducting studies about public art, to think critically about their own practice.

English

ISBN: 9798302899859Subjects--Topical Terms:

925484
Institutionalization.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Institutionalized public art

Power, Knowledge and Subjectivity in the Making of Public Art: The City of Sydney Case /
LDR:03739nmm a22004213i 4500 001 2432886
005 20250807123514.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2023 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798302899859
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31864108
035 $a AAI31864108
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Shakaa, Rana N. W., $e author. $3 3822286
245 1 0 $a Power, Knowledge and Subjectivity in the Making of Public Art: The City of Sydney Case / $c Rana N. W Shakaa.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 1 electronic resource (294 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-08, Section: A.
500 $a Advisors: Kimmel, Laurence; Easthope, Hazel.
502 $b Ph.D. $c University of New South Wales (Australia) $d 2023.
520 $a Institutionalized public art has been contested by art historians and critics. The central issue of institutionalized public art is its production within bureaucratic conditions under which its production is influenced by a disciplinary model of power that dictates how art is created. This study aimed to interrogate the assumption that public art is predetermined by its own bureaucracies through an examination of institutionalized public art defined as public art commissioned by a local government. The study focused on public art making by examining the practices of the multiple subjects involved in its production, each with their own way of doing and thinking about public art. The subjects' practices were conceptualized as another emerging power model with the potential to cultivate new terms of public art practices and outcomes, and thereby implications for the future production of public art.The theoretical and methodological constructs of the study were guided by Michel Foucault's concepts of power, knowledge and subjectivity. Through interviews and documentation analysis, the public art making process in the City of Sydney was examined in three different urban renewal sites. For each case, the research uncovered (1) the strategic directions attributed to making public art, (2) the institutional arrangements established by the local government to realize the strategic directions, and (3) the practices and knowledge of the subjects involved in the process of making public art, which offer insights into subjective-led practices of making.The study conceptualized the process of making public art as a discursive domain that involves a myriad of institutional and subjective practices. In doing so, the research not only underlined issues surrounding the institutionalization of public art but also the benefits of this institutionalization in opening channels for experimenting and exploring new practices and knowledge in the public domain of city spaces. To realize this potential, the research argued for the need to allow for flexibility and freedom within the public art making process. Furthermore, the researcher invites the subjects involved in the process of making public art, including researchers conducting studies about public art, to think critically about their own practice.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0423
650 4 $a Institutionalization. $3 925484
650 4 $a Built environment. $3 3634048
650 4 $a Culture. $3 517003
650 4 $a Urban planning. $3 2122922
650 4 $a Cultural policy. $3 555088
650 4 $a Discourse analysis. $3 524995
650 4 $a Local government. $3 562372
650 4 $a Artists. $3 524768
650 4 $a Public domain. $3 3562925
650 4 $a Design. $3 518875
650 4 $a Urban renewal. $3 532284
650 4 $a Creativity. $3 605632
650 4 $a Subjectivity. $3 525978
650 4 $a Public art. $3 750387
650 4 $a Cities. $3 3544022
650 4 $a Redevelopment. $3 3699707
653 $a Institutionalized public art
653 $a Subjectivity
653 $a Local government
690 $a 0389
690 $a 0729
690 $a 0999
710 2 $a University of New South Wales (Australia). $e degree granting institution. $3 3815488
720 1 $a Kimmel, Laurence $e degree supervisor.
720 1 $a Easthope, Hazel $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-08A.
790 $a 0423
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2023
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31864108