東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Green Streets for People: Evaluating...

Upadhyay, Jordan,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Green Streets for People: Evaluating the Experiential Performance of Green Street Design /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Green Streets for People: Evaluating the Experiential Performance of Green Street Design // Jordan Upadhyay.
作者:	Upadhyay, Jordan,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (72 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-05.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International86-05.
標題:	Landscape architecture. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31482003
ISBN:	9798342748353

Green Streets for People: Evaluating the Experiential Performance of Green Street Design /
Upadhyay, Jordan,

Green Streets for People: Evaluating the Experiential Performance of Green Street Design /Jordan Upadhyay. - 1 electronic resource (72 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-05.

This thesis develops an evaluation system that considers human experience in assessing the performance of green street design based on a people-first, experiential framework informed by cultural sustainability theory and scholarship regarding the human dimension in public space. Joan Nassauer's "Cues-to-Care" and Jan Gehl's "quality criteria concerning the pedestrian landscape" served as foundations for an evaluation rubric which scored design sites according to their performance in three main categories: Protection, Comfort, and Delight. Eight green street projects in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania were used as study sites, as the city is a leader in urban green infrastructure and has built over 200 green street projects since the inception of its Green Cities, Clean Water initiative in 2011. Study sites showed an average total score of 15.5 out of 22, with notable variations across categories. Patterns and trends indicate the significant impact of surrounding context and scale of design intervention on evaluation scores. Challenges included lack of specificity in score criteria, which lacked consideration for surrounding context or the same design elements fulfilling multiple criteria for a given site, as well as the inherent subjectivity in evaluating human experience. The results of the evaluations are based on the experience of the individual researcher who was not resident of the city nor part of the communities surrounding the sites included in the study. As such, future studies should refine the evaluation framework and incorporate more community participation, such as organizing community groups to conduct evaluations within their own neighborhoods or surveying site users on their experiences and incorporating that into the overall evaluation. Despite the above challenges, the project provides valuable insights into holistic evaluation of green street design that prioritizes both ecological performance and positive human experience and creates vibrant and resilient communities.

English

ISBN: 9798342748353Subjects--Topical Terms:

541842
Landscape architecture.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Cultural sustainability

Green Streets for People: Evaluating the Experiential Performance of Green Street Design /
LDR:03543nmm a22004453i 4500 001 2431965
005 20250624125420.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798342748353
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31482003
035 $a AAI31482003
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Upadhyay, Jordan, $e author. $0 (orcid)0009-0005-7365-9943 $3 3821016
245 1 0 $a Green Streets for People: Evaluating the Experiential Performance of Green Street Design / $c Jordan Upadhyay.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 1 electronic resource (72 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-05.
500 $a Advisors: Alomar, Richard Committee members: John-Alder, Kathleen; Faga, Barbara; Oettinger-White, Ellen.
502 $b M.L.A. $c Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, School of Graduate Studies $d 2024.
520 $a This thesis develops an evaluation system that considers human experience in assessing the performance of green street design based on a people-first, experiential framework informed by cultural sustainability theory and scholarship regarding the human dimension in public space. Joan Nassauer's "Cues-to-Care" and Jan Gehl's "quality criteria concerning the pedestrian landscape" served as foundations for an evaluation rubric which scored design sites according to their performance in three main categories: Protection, Comfort, and Delight. Eight green street projects in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania were used as study sites, as the city is a leader in urban green infrastructure and has built over 200 green street projects since the inception of its Green Cities, Clean Water initiative in 2011. Study sites showed an average total score of 15.5 out of 22, with notable variations across categories. Patterns and trends indicate the significant impact of surrounding context and scale of design intervention on evaluation scores. Challenges included lack of specificity in score criteria, which lacked consideration for surrounding context or the same design elements fulfilling multiple criteria for a given site, as well as the inherent subjectivity in evaluating human experience. The results of the evaluations are based on the experience of the individual researcher who was not resident of the city nor part of the communities surrounding the sites included in the study. As such, future studies should refine the evaluation framework and incorporate more community participation, such as organizing community groups to conduct evaluations within their own neighborhoods or surveying site users on their experiences and incorporating that into the overall evaluation. Despite the above challenges, the project provides valuable insights into holistic evaluation of green street design that prioritizes both ecological performance and positive human experience and creates vibrant and resilient communities.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0190
650 4 $a Landscape architecture. $3 541842
650 4 $a Cultural anthropology. $3 2122764
650 4 $a Urban planning. $3 2122922
650 4 $a Sustainability. $3 1029978
653 $a Cultural sustainability
653 $a Green infrastructure
653 $a Landscape performance
653 $a Street design
653 $a Urban design
690 $a 0390
690 $a 0640
690 $a 0999
690 $a 0326
710 2 $a Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, School of Graduate Studies. $b Landscape Architecture. $e degree granting institution. $3 3816125
720 1 $a Alomar, Richard $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 86-05.
790 $a 0190
791 $a M.L.A.
792 $a 2024
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31482003