東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Institutional Analysis of Consumer N...

Khan, Sadia O.,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Institutional Analysis of Consumer Neurotechnology Regulation: Mediating Third-Party Autonomy /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Institutional Analysis of Consumer Neurotechnology Regulation: Mediating Third-Party Autonomy // Sadia O Khan.
作者:	Khan, Sadia O.,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (328 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-07, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-07B.
標題:	Information science. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31640421
ISBN:	9798302167385

Institutional Analysis of Consumer Neurotechnology Regulation: Mediating Third-Party Autonomy /
Khan, Sadia O.,

Institutional Analysis of Consumer Neurotechnology Regulation: Mediating Third-Party Autonomy /Sadia O Khan. - 1 electronic resource (328 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-07, Section: B.

The moments between technological ideation and adoption are pregnant with possibilities for changing the course of human endeavor-interjecting third-party visions of a different life that can mediate individual autonomy. New consumer neurotechnologies offer liberating avenues of human engagement that bypass outward expressions of mental states (preferences, thoughts, and emotions) with direct data collection through brain-interfacing technologies. However, while beneficial in clinical applications and regulated in that context, the use of neurotechnologies in everyday consumer products such as EEG and EMG-enabled wearable devices pose serious concerns about individual autonomy, free thought, and privacy. This dissertation assesses the current state of consumer neurotechnologies and their risks and shows that potential harms are foreseeable and well-documented. While thus far national law and policy in the US has lagged technological developments in this area, policy is not absent. Circumscribing moments of technological innovation are hard and soft laws that range from incentivizing to prohibitive. This range of permissiveness makes up the regulatory landscape of technological development. This work analyzes that regulatory landscape to assess a pathway for neurotechnology policy in the US using two tools for institutional analysis derived from the Bloomington School of Institutional Economics. The Institutional Analysis and Development framework is used to analyze case studies and case law to determine 'the path for consumer neurotechnology policy in the United States.' A distinct tool of an IAD analysis, the Institutional Grammar is used as a method of content analysis to analyze US policy documents and peer reviewed articles on neurotechnology policy to assess 'the state of neurotechnology policy and what regulatory issues require attention to advance rights-preserving neurotechnology policy.' Culled from these multiple data sources, the dissertation provides an actor-network-based analysis of 'who should do what and how' and points to possible broad and narrow approaches for minimizing the risks from brain-intervening technologies in consumer products.

English

ISBN: 9798302167385Subjects--Topical Terms:

554358
Information science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

AI policy

Institutional Analysis of Consumer Neurotechnology Regulation: Mediating Third-Party Autonomy /
LDR:03733nmm a22004693i 4500 001 2430824
005 20250603111624.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798302167385
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31640421
035 $a AAI31640421
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Khan, Sadia O., $e author. $0 (orcid)0000-0002-5606-5183 $3 3819337
245 1 0 $a Institutional Analysis of Consumer Neurotechnology Regulation: Mediating Third-Party Autonomy / $c Sadia O Khan.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 1 electronic resource (328 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-07, Section: B.
500 $a Advisors: Ekbia, Hamid Committee members: Plale, Beth; Cole, Daniel; Sabanovic, Selma; Patil, Sameer.
502 $b Ph.D. $c Indiana University $d 2024.
520 $a The moments between technological ideation and adoption are pregnant with possibilities for changing the course of human endeavor-interjecting third-party visions of a different life that can mediate individual autonomy. New consumer neurotechnologies offer liberating avenues of human engagement that bypass outward expressions of mental states (preferences, thoughts, and emotions) with direct data collection through brain-interfacing technologies. However, while beneficial in clinical applications and regulated in that context, the use of neurotechnologies in everyday consumer products such as EEG and EMG-enabled wearable devices pose serious concerns about individual autonomy, free thought, and privacy. This dissertation assesses the current state of consumer neurotechnologies and their risks and shows that potential harms are foreseeable and well-documented. While thus far national law and policy in the US has lagged technological developments in this area, policy is not absent. Circumscribing moments of technological innovation are hard and soft laws that range from incentivizing to prohibitive. This range of permissiveness makes up the regulatory landscape of technological development. This work analyzes that regulatory landscape to assess a pathway for neurotechnology policy in the US using two tools for institutional analysis derived from the Bloomington School of Institutional Economics. The Institutional Analysis and Development framework is used to analyze case studies and case law to determine 'the path for consumer neurotechnology policy in the United States.' A distinct tool of an IAD analysis, the Institutional Grammar is used as a method of content analysis to analyze US policy documents and peer reviewed articles on neurotechnology policy to assess 'the state of neurotechnology policy and what regulatory issues require attention to advance rights-preserving neurotechnology policy.' Culled from these multiple data sources, the dissertation provides an actor-network-based analysis of 'who should do what and how' and points to possible broad and narrow approaches for minimizing the risks from brain-intervening technologies in consumer products.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0093
650 4 $a Information science. $3 554358
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
650 4 $a Home economics. $3 551902
650 4 $a American studies. $3 2122720
653 $a AI policy
653 $a Autonomy
653 $a Human rights
653 $a Information and communication
653 $a Institutional analysis
653 $a Neurotechnologies
690 $a 0723
690 $a 0800
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0323
690 $a 0386
710 2 $a Indiana University. $b Informatics. $e degree granting institution. $3 3765768
720 1 $a Ekbia, Hamid $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-07B.
790 $a 0093
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31640421