東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Empirical Accuracy of Immigration Fo...

Teke, John Nde,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Empirical Accuracy of Immigration Forecasts in the United States: A Comparative Algorithmic Analysis /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Empirical Accuracy of Immigration Forecasts in the United States: A Comparative Algorithmic Analysis // John Nde Teke.
作者:	Teke, John Nde,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (145 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-02, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-02A.
標題:	Statistics. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31329704
ISBN:	9798383580691

Empirical Accuracy of Immigration Forecasts in the United States: A Comparative Algorithmic Analysis /
Teke, John Nde,

Empirical Accuracy of Immigration Forecasts in the United States: A Comparative Algorithmic Analysis /John Nde Teke. - 1 electronic resource (145 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-02, Section: A.

This study investigated the persistent differences between forecast and actual immigration classes of admission since 1980. The study sought to understand the performance of the United States immigration forecasting system and its ability to set targets since 1980. Forecast errors indicate the combined impacts of systematic and unsystematic errors, making understanding the composition of forecast errors crucial. The research employed quantitative research methods, specifically correlational research design, to analyze numerical data and identify patterns. The empirical analysis involved regression analysis of actual values on forecasts based on the Prediction - Realization diagram, a standard research methodology used in immigration forecasting. The study focused on evaluating forecasting algorithms to identify the error distribution, which differs from standard evaluations that assess the accuracy and reliability of prediction algorithms. The study analyzed immigration forecast errors related to noncitizen apprehensions and refugee arrivals, identifying the predominant error type as residual covariance. This predominant error type indicated the difficulty in accurately tracking nuanced trend variations. The finding suggested that the immigration forecasting system's ability to accurately reflect dynamic changes in noncitizen apprehensions and refugee arrivals is limited. Understanding residual covariance helps develop robust planning strategies and contingency plans. Theil's inequality coefficients were low across all immigration forecasts, indicating a commendable performance in capturing underlying patterns and trends. However, unsystematic error in immigration forecasting exists and is tolerable due to challenges in perfect predictions. Recognizing these limitations is crucial for improving accuracy and reliability. The awareness promotes a proactive approach to warranted adjustments that enhance forecasting system performance.

English

ISBN: 9798383580691Subjects--Topical Terms:

517247
Statistics.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Actual immigration classes

Empirical Accuracy of Immigration Forecasts in the United States: A Comparative Algorithmic Analysis /
LDR:03356nmm a22004093i 4500 001 2430772
005 20250603111614.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798383580691
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31329704
035 $a AAI31329704
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Teke, John Nde, $e author. $3 3819264
245 1 0 $a Empirical Accuracy of Immigration Forecasts in the United States: A Comparative Algorithmic Analysis / $c John Nde Teke.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 1 electronic resource (145 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-02, Section: A.
500 $a Advisors: Kabia, Milton Committee members: Tribbey, William; Enamait, John.
502 $b Ph.D. $c National University $d 2024.
520 $a This study investigated the persistent differences between forecast and actual immigration classes of admission since 1980. The study sought to understand the performance of the United States immigration forecasting system and its ability to set targets since 1980. Forecast errors indicate the combined impacts of systematic and unsystematic errors, making understanding the composition of forecast errors crucial. The research employed quantitative research methods, specifically correlational research design, to analyze numerical data and identify patterns. The empirical analysis involved regression analysis of actual values on forecasts based on the Prediction - Realization diagram, a standard research methodology used in immigration forecasting. The study focused on evaluating forecasting algorithms to identify the error distribution, which differs from standard evaluations that assess the accuracy and reliability of prediction algorithms. The study analyzed immigration forecast errors related to noncitizen apprehensions and refugee arrivals, identifying the predominant error type as residual covariance. This predominant error type indicated the difficulty in accurately tracking nuanced trend variations. The finding suggested that the immigration forecasting system's ability to accurately reflect dynamic changes in noncitizen apprehensions and refugee arrivals is limited. Understanding residual covariance helps develop robust planning strategies and contingency plans. Theil's inequality coefficients were low across all immigration forecasts, indicating a commendable performance in capturing underlying patterns and trends. However, unsystematic error in immigration forecasting exists and is tolerable due to challenges in perfect predictions. Recognizing these limitations is crucial for improving accuracy and reliability. The awareness promotes a proactive approach to warranted adjustments that enhance forecasting system performance.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 1625
650 4 $a Statistics. $3 517247
650 4 $a Meteorology. $3 542822
650 4 $a Information science. $3 554358
653 $a Actual immigration classes
653 $a Forecasting system
653 $a Contingency plans
690 $a 0463
690 $a 0723
690 $a 0557
710 2 $a National University. $b School of Business and Technology Management. $e degree granting institution. $3 3819244
720 1 $a Kabia, Milton $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-02A.
790 $a 1625
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31329704