東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Anticipating Survival: Latent Milita...

Bills, Codey Ryan,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Anticipating Survival: Latent Militarism and the Logic of Infrastructure in the Late-Twentieth Century United States /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Anticipating Survival: Latent Militarism and the Logic of Infrastructure in the Late-Twentieth Century United States // Codey Ryan Bills.
作者:	Bills, Codey Ryan,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (273 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-02, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-02A.
標題:	Communication. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31484092
ISBN:	9798383687949

Anticipating Survival: Latent Militarism and the Logic of Infrastructure in the Late-Twentieth Century United States /
Bills, Codey Ryan,

Anticipating Survival: Latent Militarism and the Logic of Infrastructure in the Late-Twentieth Century United States /Codey Ryan Bills. - 1 electronic resource (273 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-02, Section: A.

Infrastructures were not always "infrastructure." "Infrastructure's" first notable appearances in United States' popular discourse referred to NATO attempts to reconstruct Europe post-World War II. The term remained marginal in the US until the 1990s, when it was adopted into "critical infrastructure protection," a security paradigm for systems critical to US economic and security interests. Today, "infrastructure" is taken-for-granted as a way to describe the material and technological foundations for social life. This dissertation performs a discursive genealogy of "infrastructure," focusing on the term's historical emergence and maturation within US security discourse. Through this genealogy, I reveal that "infrastructure" became dominant in descriptions of systems because of its function rather than its meaning. What I call the logic of infrastructure names a way of using "infrastructure" to 1) describe the foundations of social life as technological, 2) define which technological systems count as foundational, and 3) differentiate among human lives designated more or less worth support through systems. The logic of infrastructure's use in hegemonic discourses reproduces racism and other forms of social dispossession. In these cases, the logic of infrastructure represents attempts to align how people live with racist designs of how they should live or whether they should die. Relying on archival research, visual analysis, and textual interpretation, I track the emergence of the logic of infrastructure in US domestic security from the Cold War era into the post-Cold War era, as terrorist activity replaced nuclear weaponry as the primary vision of threat. In both eras, what I call latent militarism erased imagined lines between civilian and military systems: civilian infrastructures became available for military use and vulnerable to military attack. Civilians, meanwhile, became recognizable as military targets and as potential military threats. By retrospectively reorganizing disparate systems and discourses, 1990s critical infrastructure protection used the logic of infrastructure to realize this erasure. Ultimately, Anticipating Survival offers an extension and a critique of contemporary critical infrastructure studies. I extend crucial insights into how infrastructural systems concretize patterns of racism and social dispossession through a critique of the scholarly tendency to take "infrastructure" for granted as a category.

English

ISBN: 9798383687949Subjects--Topical Terms:

524709
Communication.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Civil defense

Anticipating Survival: Latent Militarism and the Logic of Infrastructure in the Late-Twentieth Century United States /
LDR:04003nmm a22004453i 4500 001 2430512
005 20250527055033.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798383687949
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31484092
035 $a AAI31484092
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Bills, Codey Ryan, $e author. $3 3818868
245 1 0 $a Anticipating Survival: Latent Militarism and the Logic of Infrastructure in the Late-Twentieth Century United States / $c Codey Ryan Bills.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 1 electronic resource (273 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-02, Section: A.
500 $a Advisors: Palm, Michael Committee members: Monahan, Torin; Silva, Kumi; Smith, Sara H.; Kirsch, Scott.
502 $b Ph.D. $c The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill $d 2024.
520 $a Infrastructures were not always "infrastructure." "Infrastructure's" first notable appearances in United States' popular discourse referred to NATO attempts to reconstruct Europe post-World War II. The term remained marginal in the US until the 1990s, when it was adopted into "critical infrastructure protection," a security paradigm for systems critical to US economic and security interests. Today, "infrastructure" is taken-for-granted as a way to describe the material and technological foundations for social life. This dissertation performs a discursive genealogy of "infrastructure," focusing on the term's historical emergence and maturation within US security discourse. Through this genealogy, I reveal that "infrastructure" became dominant in descriptions of systems because of its function rather than its meaning. What I call the logic of infrastructure names a way of using "infrastructure" to 1) describe the foundations of social life as technological, 2) define which technological systems count as foundational, and 3) differentiate among human lives designated more or less worth support through systems. The logic of infrastructure's use in hegemonic discourses reproduces racism and other forms of social dispossession. In these cases, the logic of infrastructure represents attempts to align how people live with racist designs of how they should live or whether they should die. Relying on archival research, visual analysis, and textual interpretation, I track the emergence of the logic of infrastructure in US domestic security from the Cold War era into the post-Cold War era, as terrorist activity replaced nuclear weaponry as the primary vision of threat. In both eras, what I call latent militarism erased imagined lines between civilian and military systems: civilian infrastructures became available for military use and vulnerable to military attack. Civilians, meanwhile, became recognizable as military targets and as potential military threats. By retrospectively reorganizing disparate systems and discourses, 1990s critical infrastructure protection used the logic of infrastructure to realize this erasure. Ultimately, Anticipating Survival offers an extension and a critique of contemporary critical infrastructure studies. I extend crucial insights into how infrastructural systems concretize patterns of racism and social dispossession through a critique of the scholarly tendency to take "infrastructure" for granted as a category.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0153
650 4 $a Communication. $3 524709
650 4 $a American studies. $3 2122720
650 4 $a Military studies. $3 2197382
653 $a Civil defense
653 $a Discourse
653 $a Domestic security
653 $a Infrastructure
653 $a Racism
653 $a World War II
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0323
690 $a 0750
710 2 $a The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. $b Communication Studies. $e degree granting institution. $3 3818869
720 1 $a Palm, Michael $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-02A.
790 $a 0153
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31484092