東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Ambiguity and Uncertainty Surroundin...

Al Mahdouri, Abir,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Ambiguity and Uncertainty Surrounding Public Policy and Confidentiality in the Context of Arbitration Intellectual Property Disputes /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Ambiguity and Uncertainty Surrounding Public Policy and Confidentiality in the Context of Arbitration Intellectual Property Disputes // Abir Al Mahdouri.
作者:	Al Mahdouri, Abir,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (254 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-05, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-05B.
標題:	Arbitration. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31655226
ISBN:	9798346394914

Ambiguity and Uncertainty Surrounding Public Policy and Confidentiality in the Context of Arbitration Intellectual Property Disputes /
Al Mahdouri, Abir,

Ambiguity and Uncertainty Surrounding Public Policy and Confidentiality in the Context of Arbitration Intellectual Property Disputes /Abir Al Mahdouri. - 1 electronic resource (254 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-05, Section: B.

This thesis offers a thorough examination of the interplay between public policy and the enforcement of arbitral awards, with a special focus on Intellectual Property (IP) rights disputes. It presents the argument that the effectiveness of arbitration largely depends on the ability to enforce its awards, which, if undermined, could weaken confidence in arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution method. Public policy is often cited as a common ground for challenging the enforcement of arbitral awards, with courts interpreting the concept of public policy narrowly. Moving beyond theoretical discussions, this thesis employs indicative statistics and analysis to demonstrate the extent to which public policy is considered an actual barrier to the enforcement of arbitral awards, with particular attention to IP disputes. This indicative statistic covers general arbitration cases with a focus on specific IP disputes. The findings suggest that public policy is interpreted restrictively, with a strong inclination towards enforcing arbitral awards.Furthermore, this thesis highlights a significant challenge related to confidentiality in arbitration, which is particularly pertinent in IP disputes where confidentiality is of paramount importance. This thesis puts forward a 'hybrid balancing approach' that thoughtfully weighs up the need for confidentiality against the need for transparency. This proposed approach is intended to harmonize the varying treatments of confidentiality across jurisdictions, thereby enhancing the predictability and effectiveness of arbitration. This, in turn, could increase the efficiency of arbitration as a favourable alternative method for resolving IP disputes.Ultimately, this thesis not only offers valuable insights into the challenges posed by public policy in the enforcement of arbitral awards but also proposes a strategic solution to address the tension between confidentiality and transparency in arbitration. Its findings and recommendations carry profound implications for policymakers, arbitrators, and legal practitioners in the realm of international arbitration, particularly within the field of intellectual property.

English

ISBN: 9798346394914Subjects--Topical Terms:

3562897
Arbitration.

Ambiguity and Uncertainty Surrounding Public Policy and Confidentiality in the Context of Arbitration Intellectual Property Disputes /
LDR:03722nmm a22004333i 4500 001 2429740
005 20250430100902.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798346394914
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31655226
035 $a (MiAaPQD)Manchester7cac0a08-7a83-452b-8d12-e3caad8cd853
035 $a AAI31655226
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Al Mahdouri, Abir, $e author. $3 3817741
245 1 0 $a Ambiguity and Uncertainty Surrounding Public Policy and Confidentiality in the Context of Arbitration Intellectual Property Disputes / $c Abir Al Mahdouri.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 1 electronic resource (254 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-05, Section: B.
500 $a Advisors: Tarawneh, Jasem; Gadd, David; Butler, Nicolette.
502 $b Ph.D. $c The University of Manchester (United Kingdom) $d 2024.
520 $a This thesis offers a thorough examination of the interplay between public policy and the enforcement of arbitral awards, with a special focus on Intellectual Property (IP) rights disputes. It presents the argument that the effectiveness of arbitration largely depends on the ability to enforce its awards, which, if undermined, could weaken confidence in arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution method. Public policy is often cited as a common ground for challenging the enforcement of arbitral awards, with courts interpreting the concept of public policy narrowly. Moving beyond theoretical discussions, this thesis employs indicative statistics and analysis to demonstrate the extent to which public policy is considered an actual barrier to the enforcement of arbitral awards, with particular attention to IP disputes. This indicative statistic covers general arbitration cases with a focus on specific IP disputes. The findings suggest that public policy is interpreted restrictively, with a strong inclination towards enforcing arbitral awards.Furthermore, this thesis highlights a significant challenge related to confidentiality in arbitration, which is particularly pertinent in IP disputes where confidentiality is of paramount importance. This thesis puts forward a 'hybrid balancing approach' that thoughtfully weighs up the need for confidentiality against the need for transparency. This proposed approach is intended to harmonize the varying treatments of confidentiality across jurisdictions, thereby enhancing the predictability and effectiveness of arbitration. This, in turn, could increase the efficiency of arbitration as a favourable alternative method for resolving IP disputes.Ultimately, this thesis not only offers valuable insights into the challenges posed by public policy in the enforcement of arbitral awards but also proposes a strategic solution to address the tension between confidentiality and transparency in arbitration. Its findings and recommendations carry profound implications for policymakers, arbitrators, and legal practitioners in the realm of international arbitration, particularly within the field of intellectual property.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 1543
650 4 $a Arbitration. $3 3562897
650 4 $a Signs. $3 3686556
650 4 $a Intellectual property. $3 572975
650 4 $a Enforcement. $3 3564162
650 4 $a International law. $3 560784
650 4 $a Confidentiality. $3 736289
650 4 $a Flexibility. $3 3560705
650 4 $a Jurisdiction. $3 890764
650 4 $a Licenses. $3 755699
650 4 $a Disputes. $3 3707223
650 4 $a Engineering research. $3 3690201
650 4 $a State court decisions. $3 3682817
650 4 $a Litigation. $3 3564647
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
650 4 $a Judges & magistrates. $3 3562075
650 4 $a Alternative dispute resolution. $3 3168470
650 4 $a Engineering. $3 586835
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0513
690 $a 0616
690 $a 0649
690 $a 0537
710 2 $a The University of Manchester (United Kingdom). $e degree granting institution. $3 3759026
720 1 $a Tarawneh, Jasem $e degree supervisor.
720 1 $a Gadd, David $e degree supervisor.
720 1 $a Butler, Nicolette $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-05B.
790 $a 1543
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31655226