語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
到查詢結果
[ null ]
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Transfer Across Media: Learning Tran...
~
Cui, Wenqi,
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Transfer Across Media: Learning Transfer in Digital-Mediated Multimodal Writing in First-Year Composition /
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Transfer Across Media: Learning Transfer in Digital-Mediated Multimodal Writing in First-Year Composition // Wenqi Cui.
作者:
Cui, Wenqi,
面頁冊數:
1 electronic resource (262 pages)
附註:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-03, Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International85-03A.
標題:
Rhetoric. -
電子資源:
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30531296
ISBN:
9798380164931
Transfer Across Media: Learning Transfer in Digital-Mediated Multimodal Writing in First-Year Composition /
Cui, Wenqi,
Transfer Across Media: Learning Transfer in Digital-Mediated Multimodal Writing in First-Year Composition /
Wenqi Cui. - 1 electronic resource (262 pages)
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-03, Section: A.
This dissertation has a couple of purposes: 1) to examine what writing knowledge and digital experiences are transferred/fail to be transferred to digital writing in a first-year writing class, and 2) to explore how writing knowledge, digital literacy, and students' prior writing experiences impact students' transfer between different activity systems. To address this study's research questions, multiple sets of data were employed: screencast videos of students' writing processes, students' writing samples, students' reflective journals, survey responses, and post-task stimulated recall interviews. Participants (n=8) were from a first-year composition class. Data were analyzed and categorized to achieve the above research purposes.The results of this study indicate that six knowledge domains are central to transfer when students wrote across different activity systems, including Anne Beaufort's (2007) Five Knowledge Domains (genre knowledge, discourse community knowledge, rhetorical knowledge, writing process knowledge, and subject knowledge) and digital literacy (functional, cognitive, critical, and rhetorical digital literacy skills). The skills, strategies, and knowledge that were transferred to college digital writing were from students' prior academic and non-academic (both digital and traditional) writing experiences. These strategies and knowledge were also tools for students to achieve their writing objectives within various activity systems. This study shows that the most salient tools that were transferred are rhetorical digital literacy, cognitive digital literacy, functional digital literacy, genre knowledge, rhetorical knowledge, and writing process knowledge.The findings also indicate that students' writing transfer was affected by the complex dynamics within and among activity systems, which resulted in six types of transfer practices: dynamic, developmental, transformative, cross-contextual, rhetorical, and idiosyncratic transfer. Three types of transfer practices, developmental, idiosyncratic, and transformative transfer, were found to be particularly significant in the study. On the one hand, students' writing transfer was mediated by external factors, notably through their interactions with genre conventions, discourse community conventions, and audience's expectations. On the other hand, it was also mediated by writers' agency, internal cognitive processes, and their unique personal experiences and knowledge bases. Therefore, when writing within an activity system, students learned about dominant genre conventions and discourse community knowledge, using them to guide their writing activities. In this way, students deepened and developed their understanding of those writing strategies and conventions and transferred them to new writing practices. That is, the developmental transfer occurred. In the meantime, they brought in their prior experiences, cultural and social stances, knowledge bases, or conventions from other communities or activity systems where they were simultaneously engaged in. In this sense, idiosyncratic and transformative transfer occurred. In brief, the interactions with different activity systems and writer's agency resulted in the occurrence of developmental, idiosyncratic, and transformative transfer.The findings of this study contribute significantly to the field of writing studies. Firstly, the study expands upon Beaufort's (2007) Five Knowledge Domain framework by incorporating digital literacy as the sixth domain. Secondly, it extends DePalma and Ringer's (2011) adaptive transfer framework by including a new category, developmental transfer, and offering empirical evidence for all categories. Thirdly, the study proposes two new approaches to researching transfer. Lastly, it suggests using the Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) perspective to research and teach transfer. Based on the theoretical insights and empirical evidence presented in this study, two pedagogical recommendations are suggested: (1) teaching digital literacy to facilitate digital writing transfer, and (2) using multiple-activity-system-assignment sequence to promote transferability.
English
ISBN: 9798380164931Subjects--Topical Terms:
516647
Rhetoric.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT)
Transfer Across Media: Learning Transfer in Digital-Mediated Multimodal Writing in First-Year Composition /
LDR
:05734nmm a22004453i 4500
001
2429495
005
20250502090222.5
006
m o d
007
cr|nu||||||||
008
261011s2023 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020
$a
9798380164931
035
$a
(MiAaPQD)AAI30531296
035
$a
AAI30531296
040
$a
MiAaPQD
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQD
$e
rda
100
1
$a
Cui, Wenqi,
$e
author.
$3
3817373
245
1 0
$a
Transfer Across Media: Learning Transfer in Digital-Mediated Multimodal Writing in First-Year Composition /
$c
Wenqi Cui.
264
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2023
300
$a
1 electronic resource (262 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-03, Section: A.
500
$a
Advisors: Driscoll, Dana Lynn Committee members: Pagnucci, Gian S.; Vetter, Matthew.
502
$b
Ph.D.
$c
Indiana University of Pennsylvania
$d
2023.
520
$a
This dissertation has a couple of purposes: 1) to examine what writing knowledge and digital experiences are transferred/fail to be transferred to digital writing in a first-year writing class, and 2) to explore how writing knowledge, digital literacy, and students' prior writing experiences impact students' transfer between different activity systems. To address this study's research questions, multiple sets of data were employed: screencast videos of students' writing processes, students' writing samples, students' reflective journals, survey responses, and post-task stimulated recall interviews. Participants (n=8) were from a first-year composition class. Data were analyzed and categorized to achieve the above research purposes.The results of this study indicate that six knowledge domains are central to transfer when students wrote across different activity systems, including Anne Beaufort's (2007) Five Knowledge Domains (genre knowledge, discourse community knowledge, rhetorical knowledge, writing process knowledge, and subject knowledge) and digital literacy (functional, cognitive, critical, and rhetorical digital literacy skills). The skills, strategies, and knowledge that were transferred to college digital writing were from students' prior academic and non-academic (both digital and traditional) writing experiences. These strategies and knowledge were also tools for students to achieve their writing objectives within various activity systems. This study shows that the most salient tools that were transferred are rhetorical digital literacy, cognitive digital literacy, functional digital literacy, genre knowledge, rhetorical knowledge, and writing process knowledge.The findings also indicate that students' writing transfer was affected by the complex dynamics within and among activity systems, which resulted in six types of transfer practices: dynamic, developmental, transformative, cross-contextual, rhetorical, and idiosyncratic transfer. Three types of transfer practices, developmental, idiosyncratic, and transformative transfer, were found to be particularly significant in the study. On the one hand, students' writing transfer was mediated by external factors, notably through their interactions with genre conventions, discourse community conventions, and audience's expectations. On the other hand, it was also mediated by writers' agency, internal cognitive processes, and their unique personal experiences and knowledge bases. Therefore, when writing within an activity system, students learned about dominant genre conventions and discourse community knowledge, using them to guide their writing activities. In this way, students deepened and developed their understanding of those writing strategies and conventions and transferred them to new writing practices. That is, the developmental transfer occurred. In the meantime, they brought in their prior experiences, cultural and social stances, knowledge bases, or conventions from other communities or activity systems where they were simultaneously engaged in. In this sense, idiosyncratic and transformative transfer occurred. In brief, the interactions with different activity systems and writer's agency resulted in the occurrence of developmental, idiosyncratic, and transformative transfer.The findings of this study contribute significantly to the field of writing studies. Firstly, the study expands upon Beaufort's (2007) Five Knowledge Domain framework by incorporating digital literacy as the sixth domain. Secondly, it extends DePalma and Ringer's (2011) adaptive transfer framework by including a new category, developmental transfer, and offering empirical evidence for all categories. Thirdly, the study proposes two new approaches to researching transfer. Lastly, it suggests using the Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) perspective to research and teach transfer. Based on the theoretical insights and empirical evidence presented in this study, two pedagogical recommendations are suggested: (1) teaching digital literacy to facilitate digital writing transfer, and (2) using multiple-activity-system-assignment sequence to promote transferability.
546
$a
English
590
$a
School code: 0318
650
4
$a
Rhetoric.
$3
516647
650
4
$a
Higher education.
$3
641065
650
4
$a
Technical communication.
$3
3172863
653
$a
Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT)
653
$a
Digital literacy
653
$a
Digital multimodal writing
653
$a
First-year composition
653
$a
Screencast videos
653
$a
Writing transfer
690
$a
0681
690
$a
0643
690
$a
0745
710
2
$a
Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
$b
English.
$e
degree granting institution.
$3
3817309
720
1
$a
Driscoll, Dana Lynn
$e
degree supervisor.
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
85-03A.
790
$a
0318
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2023
856
4 0
$u
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30531296
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9525190
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入
(1)帳號:一般為「身分證號」;外籍生或交換生則為「學號」。 (2)密碼:預設為帳號末四碼。
帳號
.
密碼
.
請在此電腦上記得個人資料
取消
忘記密碼? (請注意!您必須已在系統登記E-mail信箱方能使用。)