東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Sticking to the Status Quo: Examinin...

Nautiyal, Snigdha,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Sticking to the Status Quo: Examining the Politics of Capacity Building and Spatial Arrangements for Transformation in the Global Climate Regime /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Sticking to the Status Quo: Examining the Politics of Capacity Building and Spatial Arrangements for Transformation in the Global Climate Regime // Snigdha Nautiyal.
作者:	Nautiyal, Snigdha,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (239 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-05, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-05B.
標題:	Climate change. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31636139
ISBN:	9798346737438

Sticking to the Status Quo: Examining the Politics of Capacity Building and Spatial Arrangements for Transformation in the Global Climate Regime /
Nautiyal, Snigdha,

Sticking to the Status Quo: Examining the Politics of Capacity Building and Spatial Arrangements for Transformation in the Global Climate Regime /Snigdha Nautiyal. - 1 electronic resource (239 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-05, Section: B.

Intensifying climate impacts and persistent development challenges have led to mounting calls for transformation. However, over three decades of global climate negotiations have failed at keeping global average temperatures within 1.5 °C. This dissertation examines how mechanisms at the global level inhibit or enable more transformative climate action. Specifically, it focuses on two cases that hold potential for enabling transformation but have remained underexamined: capacity building and spatial arrangements. Capacity building is intended to empower groups to pursue their own agendas but remains ambiguous and largely unnoticed within the United Nations Framework Convention for Climate Change (UNFCCC). Similarly, surprisingly little attention has been paid to how spatial and material arrangements shape the global regime.This dissertation explores three interconnected sites to examine how and where transformation is inhibited/enabled across these two components at the global level. The first study synthesizes five fields of practice to identify what capacity building for transformation should look like, highlighting the importance of accountability structures, financial arrangements, and decision-making that enables bottom-up agency. The second study uses document analysis to examine capacity building within the UNFCCC. This study discovers a 'stickiness' within the regime which institutionalizes a narrow set of imaginaries and capacity building actions that reproduce power relations and dull the transformative potential of holistic approaches to capacity building. The third study is an ethnographic examination of spatial arrangements within the UNFCCC to understand whether and how 'stickiness' manifests materially in the regime. This study shows how spatial arrangements exclude less powerful voices, their visions, and values from global decision-making.Theoretically and practically, this dissertation uncovers how hidden mechanisms within the global regime reinforce the status quo and undermine transformative efforts. This research suggests centering marginal, discordant, and nuanced perspectives through individual, institutional, material, and discursive pathways to enrich possibilities and opportunities for transformation.

English

ISBN: 9798346737438Subjects--Topical Terms:

2079509
Climate change.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Capacity building

Sticking to the Status Quo: Examining the Politics of Capacity Building and Spatial Arrangements for Transformation in the Global Climate Regime /
LDR:03730nmm a22004093i 4500 001 2429416
005 20250430100823.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798346737438
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31636139
035 $a AAI31636139
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Nautiyal, Snigdha, $e author. $3 3817252
245 1 0 $a Sticking to the Status Quo: Examining the Politics of Capacity Building and Spatial Arrangements for Transformation in the Global Climate Regime / $c Snigdha Nautiyal.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 1 electronic resource (239 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-05, Section: B.
500 $a Advisors: Klinsky, Sonja Committee members: Schugurensky, Daniel; Lemley, Christine.
502 $b Ph.D. $c Arizona State University $d 2024.
520 $a Intensifying climate impacts and persistent development challenges have led to mounting calls for transformation. However, over three decades of global climate negotiations have failed at keeping global average temperatures within 1.5 °C. This dissertation examines how mechanisms at the global level inhibit or enable more transformative climate action. Specifically, it focuses on two cases that hold potential for enabling transformation but have remained underexamined: capacity building and spatial arrangements. Capacity building is intended to empower groups to pursue their own agendas but remains ambiguous and largely unnoticed within the United Nations Framework Convention for Climate Change (UNFCCC). Similarly, surprisingly little attention has been paid to how spatial and material arrangements shape the global regime.This dissertation explores three interconnected sites to examine how and where transformation is inhibited/enabled across these two components at the global level. The first study synthesizes five fields of practice to identify what capacity building for transformation should look like, highlighting the importance of accountability structures, financial arrangements, and decision-making that enables bottom-up agency. The second study uses document analysis to examine capacity building within the UNFCCC. This study discovers a 'stickiness' within the regime which institutionalizes a narrow set of imaginaries and capacity building actions that reproduce power relations and dull the transformative potential of holistic approaches to capacity building. The third study is an ethnographic examination of spatial arrangements within the UNFCCC to understand whether and how 'stickiness' manifests materially in the regime. This study shows how spatial arrangements exclude less powerful voices, their visions, and values from global decision-making.Theoretically and practically, this dissertation uncovers how hidden mechanisms within the global regime reinforce the status quo and undermine transformative efforts. This research suggests centering marginal, discordant, and nuanced perspectives through individual, institutional, material, and discursive pathways to enrich possibilities and opportunities for transformation.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0010
650 4 $a Climate change. $2 bicssc $3 2079509
650 4 $a Atmospheric sciences. $3 3168354
653 $a Capacity building
653 $a Climate policy
653 $a Knowledge politics
653 $a Global climate negotiations
690 $a 0404
690 $a 0725
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $b Sustainability. $e degree granting institution. $3 3817253
720 1 $a Klinsky, Sonja $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-05B.
790 $a 0010
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31636139