東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Essays on Reputation and Decision Ma...

Moore, Molly.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Essays on Reputation and Decision Making.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Essays on Reputation and Decision Making./
作者:	Moore, Molly.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2024,
面頁冊數:	470 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-12B.
標題:	Behavioral sciences. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31294539
ISBN:	9798382784267

Essays on Reputation and Decision Making.
Moore, Molly.

Essays on Reputation and Decision Making. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024 - 470 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Harvard University, 2024.

An extensive literature demonstrates that people care deeply about the impressions they leave on others (Lerner and Tetlock, 1999; Tetlock, 2000, 2002). Decision makers strive to maintain positive reputations and observers reward those who have such positive reputations. Across the following three essays, I explore how observer perceptions of behavior align with-and influence-people's decision making in the domains of ideological disagreement and gender. The first essay tests whether interpersonal concerns are a driver of selective exposure to ideologically-aligned information. Specifically, I develop a social signaling model of selective exposure, which predicts that (1) individuals shift their information selection decisions to signal to observers and (2) observers reward such shifts. This model is tested across five financially-incentivized, pre-registered experiments (N = 3,598), finding that tailoring one's information selection decisions can indeed have strategic value-but only under certain theoretically-predictable conditions. The second essay directly extends these results by developing a psychological model for how engagement with opposing views will be perceived by others-identifying when engagement might lead to interpersonal rewards versus costs. The third essay builds on the foundation that perceptions of others are a key predictor of behavior, but turns the attention to gender. Across fifteen empirical studies (N = 8,979), the third essay documents robust evidence for believed gender differences in social preferences. Specifically, people expect that women are more generous and more equality-oriented-despite finding little to no evidence for differences in behavior between men and women. Additionally, building upon the associative memory literature, this essay provides causal evidence for one source of such beliefs. Taken together, these three essays highlight not only how reputational considerations shape decision making and biases, but also suggests novel mitigation strategies.

ISBN: 9798382784267Subjects--Topical Terms:

529833
Behavioral sciences.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Conflict

Essays on Reputation and Decision Making.
LDR:03221nmm a2200433 4500 001 2404510
005 20241213095554.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2024 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798382784267
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31294539
035 $a AAI31294539
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Moore, Molly. $0 (orcid)0000-0001-5868-8272 $3 3774825
245 1 0 $a Essays on Reputation and Decision Making.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 470 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Minson, Julia.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Harvard University, 2024.
520 $a An extensive literature demonstrates that people care deeply about the impressions they leave on others (Lerner and Tetlock, 1999; Tetlock, 2000, 2002). Decision makers strive to maintain positive reputations and observers reward those who have such positive reputations. Across the following three essays, I explore how observer perceptions of behavior align with-and influence-people's decision making in the domains of ideological disagreement and gender. The first essay tests whether interpersonal concerns are a driver of selective exposure to ideologically-aligned information. Specifically, I develop a social signaling model of selective exposure, which predicts that (1) individuals shift their information selection decisions to signal to observers and (2) observers reward such shifts. This model is tested across five financially-incentivized, pre-registered experiments (N = 3,598), finding that tailoring one's information selection decisions can indeed have strategic value-but only under certain theoretically-predictable conditions. The second essay directly extends these results by developing a psychological model for how engagement with opposing views will be perceived by others-identifying when engagement might lead to interpersonal rewards versus costs. The third essay builds on the foundation that perceptions of others are a key predictor of behavior, but turns the attention to gender. Across fifteen empirical studies (N = 8,979), the third essay documents robust evidence for believed gender differences in social preferences. Specifically, people expect that women are more generous and more equality-oriented-despite finding little to no evidence for differences in behavior between men and women. Additionally, building upon the associative memory literature, this essay provides causal evidence for one source of such beliefs. Taken together, these three essays highlight not only how reputational considerations shape decision making and biases, but also suggests novel mitigation strategies.
590 $a School code: 0084.
650 4 $a Behavioral sciences. $3 529833
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 520219
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
653 $a Conflict
653 $a Gender
653 $a Impression management
653 $a Judgment
653 $a Reputation
653 $a Selective exposure
653 $a Decision making
690 $a 0602
690 $a 0501
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0511
690 $a 0630
710 2 $a Harvard University. $b Public Policy. $3 2097263
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-12B.
790 $a 0084
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31294539