東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Reactions to Different Framings of I...

Brown, Riana M.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Reactions to Different Framings of Inequality and Bias.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Reactions to Different Framings of Inequality and Bias./
作者:	Brown, Riana M.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
面頁冊數:	205 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-01B.
標題:	Social psychology. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30247481
ISBN:	9798379773601

Reactions to Different Framings of Inequality and Bias.
Brown, Riana M.

Reactions to Different Framings of Inequality and Bias. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 205 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--New York University, 2023.

The first paper in my dissertation package, on which I am first author, is an empirical paper published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin with Maureen Craig titled, "Intergroup Inequality Heightens Reports of Discrimination along Alternative Identity Dimensions". The second paper in the package, on which I am first author, is an empirical paper published in Journal of Experimental Social Psychology with Maureen Craig and Even Apfelbaum titled, "European Americans' Intentions to Confront Racial Bias: Considering Who, What (Kind), and Why". Finally, the third paper in the package, on which I share-first authorship with Pia Dietze, is an unpublished empirical paper with Maureen Craig titled, "Highlighting Health Consequences of Racial Disparities Sparks Support for Action".My Dissertation aims to investigate how different framings of inequality and bias affect support for social change at different levels, assessing intrapersonal, interpersonal, and societal-level outcomes. Specifically, I examine reactions to evidence of inequality and bias emphasizing different information, such as how inequality affects the advantaged (vs. the disadvantaged) or the health consequences (vs. economic or belonging consequences). I further assess how these framings may affect intrapersonal concerns, such as highlighting one's own experience of discrimination, interpersonal experiences, such as supporting confrontation of perpetrators of bias, and societal-level outcomes, such as supporting engagement in collective action to reduce inequality. My first paper investigates how framing inequality as ingroup advantage, outgroup disadvantage, or without relevant inequality information leads people to highlight their discrimination in other domains. My second paper explores whether people support confronting people implementing biased policies and institutional practices (i.e., structural bias) vs. people expressing prejudicial attitudes (i.e., interpersonal bias) and whether the perpetrator was a friend or stranger. The third paper tests if reading about health-related disparities, relative to disparities in other domains, leads to more support for action (e.g., likelihood to engage in collective action to reduce inequality) because health-related disparities are perceived as more morally sacred, and thus, more unjust. Overall, this work highlights how different information about inequality uniquely affects how people react to inequality and support social change, emphasizing how people may highlight their own experiences of injustice, may seek to confront individual perpetrators, or may seek to engage in efforts to spark social change.

ISBN: 9798379773601Subjects--Topical Terms:

520219
Social psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Bias

Reactions to Different Framings of Inequality and Bias.
LDR:03771nmm a2200385 4500 001 2404452
005 20241213095536.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798379773601
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30247481
035 $a AAI30247481
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Brown, Riana M. $3 3774767
245 1 0 $a Reactions to Different Framings of Inequality and Bias.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 205 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Craig, Maureen A.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--New York University, 2023.
520 $a The first paper in my dissertation package, on which I am first author, is an empirical paper published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin with Maureen Craig titled, "Intergroup Inequality Heightens Reports of Discrimination along Alternative Identity Dimensions". The second paper in the package, on which I am first author, is an empirical paper published in Journal of Experimental Social Psychology with Maureen Craig and Even Apfelbaum titled, "European Americans' Intentions to Confront Racial Bias: Considering Who, What (Kind), and Why". Finally, the third paper in the package, on which I share-first authorship with Pia Dietze, is an unpublished empirical paper with Maureen Craig titled, "Highlighting Health Consequences of Racial Disparities Sparks Support for Action".My Dissertation aims to investigate how different framings of inequality and bias affect support for social change at different levels, assessing intrapersonal, interpersonal, and societal-level outcomes. Specifically, I examine reactions to evidence of inequality and bias emphasizing different information, such as how inequality affects the advantaged (vs. the disadvantaged) or the health consequences (vs. economic or belonging consequences). I further assess how these framings may affect intrapersonal concerns, such as highlighting one's own experience of discrimination, interpersonal experiences, such as supporting confrontation of perpetrators of bias, and societal-level outcomes, such as supporting engagement in collective action to reduce inequality. My first paper investigates how framing inequality as ingroup advantage, outgroup disadvantage, or without relevant inequality information leads people to highlight their discrimination in other domains. My second paper explores whether people support confronting people implementing biased policies and institutional practices (i.e., structural bias) vs. people expressing prejudicial attitudes (i.e., interpersonal bias) and whether the perpetrator was a friend or stranger. The third paper tests if reading about health-related disparities, relative to disparities in other domains, leads to more support for action (e.g., likelihood to engage in collective action to reduce inequality) because health-related disparities are perceived as more morally sacred, and thus, more unjust. Overall, this work highlights how different information about inequality uniquely affects how people react to inequality and support social change, emphasizing how people may highlight their own experiences of injustice, may seek to confront individual perpetrators, or may seek to engage in efforts to spark social change.
590 $a School code: 0146.
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 520219
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
650 4 $a Experimental psychology. $3 2144733
653 $a Bias
653 $a Framing
653 $a Inequality
653 $a Intergroup relations
653 $a Social change
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0623
710 2 $a New York University. $b Psychology. $3 1025800
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-01B.
790 $a 0146
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30247481