東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

PROCESS TRACING INVESTIGATION INTO P...

DIAZ, JULIAN, III.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

PROCESS TRACING INVESTIGATION INTO PROBLEM-SOLVING WITHIN RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	PROCESS TRACING INVESTIGATION INTO PROBLEM-SOLVING WITHIN RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL./
Author:	DIAZ, JULIAN, III.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 1987,
Description:	310 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 48-07, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International48-07A.
Subject:	Studies. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=8726477
ISBN:	9798207082790

PROCESS TRACING INVESTIGATION INTO PROBLEM-SOLVING WITHIN RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL.
DIAZ, JULIAN, III.

PROCESS TRACING INVESTIGATION INTO PROBLEM-SOLVING WITHIN RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 1987 - 310 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 48-07, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgia State University, 1987.

The goal of this investigation is to initiate research into problem solving in one ill-structured domain using the theories and findings of well-structured problem solving as a foundation. A process tracing technique was employed to study the problem solving behavior of twelve students and twelve experts in residential real estate appraisal. To compare subject processes, protocols were conceptualized as frequency distributions and were compared using Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit tests. Other nonparametric techniques were employed to examine single point response variables. Experts were discovered to solve appraisal problems in a manner inconsistent with the normative model, the Appraisal Process. This nonnormative behavior held when task settings were familiar to the subject as well as when tasks had unfamiliar locational settings. Student behavior also was nonnormative. This finding prevented the straightforward extension of well-structured problem solving theories into this ill-structured environment. Neither experts nor students could recall the normative model indicating that the departure from normative behavior was not deliberated at a conscious level. Experts were found to spend less time than students on information search. Experts also were found to spend less time on information search with the locationally unfamiliar task than with the familiar task. This tendency may be evidence of an heuristic with the potential to produce suboptimal judgments. On a less statistically formal level, the observation was made that expert behavior was less cognitively demanding than the normative model. Similarly, two general information search strategies were observed. The strategy favored by experts could not guarantee optimal selections but was less cognitively demanding than the search strategy favored by students. The tendency to minimize cognitive effort is the finding which unifies this investigation. Implications for future research are discussed.

ISBN: 9798207082790Subjects--Topical Terms:

3433795
Studies.

PROCESS TRACING INVESTIGATION INTO PROBLEM-SOLVING WITHIN RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL.
LDR:03003nmm a2200325 4500 001 2402869
005 20241104055718.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s1987 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798207082790
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI8726477
035 $a AAI8726477
035 $a 2402869
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a DIAZ, JULIAN, III. $3 3773121
245 1 0 $a PROCESS TRACING INVESTIGATION INTO PROBLEM-SOLVING WITHIN RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 1987
300 $a 310 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 48-07, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgia State University, 1987.
520 $a The goal of this investigation is to initiate research into problem solving in one ill-structured domain using the theories and findings of well-structured problem solving as a foundation. A process tracing technique was employed to study the problem solving behavior of twelve students and twelve experts in residential real estate appraisal. To compare subject processes, protocols were conceptualized as frequency distributions and were compared using Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit tests. Other nonparametric techniques were employed to examine single point response variables. Experts were discovered to solve appraisal problems in a manner inconsistent with the normative model, the Appraisal Process. This nonnormative behavior held when task settings were familiar to the subject as well as when tasks had unfamiliar locational settings. Student behavior also was nonnormative. This finding prevented the straightforward extension of well-structured problem solving theories into this ill-structured environment. Neither experts nor students could recall the normative model indicating that the departure from normative behavior was not deliberated at a conscious level. Experts were found to spend less time than students on information search. Experts also were found to spend less time on information search with the locationally unfamiliar task than with the familiar task. This tendency may be evidence of an heuristic with the potential to produce suboptimal judgments. On a less statistically formal level, the observation was made that expert behavior was less cognitively demanding than the normative model. Similarly, two general information search strategies were observed. The strategy favored by experts could not guarantee optimal selections but was less cognitively demanding than the search strategy favored by students. The tendency to minimize cognitive effort is the finding which unifies this investigation. Implications for future research are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0079.
650 4 $a Studies. $3 3433795
650 4 $a Problem solving. $3 516855
650 4 $a Students. $3 756581
650 4 $a Memory. $3 522110
650 4 $a Discriminant analysis. $3 560438
650 4 $a Appraisers. $3 3773122
650 4 $a Traditions. $3 3562097
650 4 $a Heuristic. $3 568476
650 4 $a Short term. $3 3697307
650 4 $a Cognition & reasoning. $3 3556293
650 4 $a Research methodology. $3 3559994
650 4 $a Validity. $3 3548271
650 4 $a Human performance. $3 3562051
650 4 $a Hypotheses. $3 3560118
650 4 $a Knowledge. $3 872758
650 4 $a Decision making. $3 517204
650 4 $a Copyright. $3 601694
650 4 $a Design. $3 518875
650 4 $a Probability. $3 518898
650 4 $a Information processing. $3 3561808
650 4 $a Paradigms. $3 3560141
650 4 $a Learning. $3 516521
650 4 $a Semantics. $3 520060
650 4 $a Internal validity. $3 3768685
650 4 $a Descriptive research. $3 3773123
690 $a 0310
690 $a 0389
710 2 $a Georgia State University. $3 1018518
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 48-07A.
790 $a 0079
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1987
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=8726477