東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Improving the Oil Production Greenho...

Long, Wennan.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Improving the Oil Production Greenhouse Gas Emissions Estimator (Opgee): Validation, Modeling, and System Design.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Improving the Oil Production Greenhouse Gas Emissions Estimator (Opgee): Validation, Modeling, and System Design./
Author:	Long, Wennan.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
Description:	227 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-06, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-06A.
Subject:	Gases. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30726870
ISBN:	9798381019964

Improving the Oil Production Greenhouse Gas Emissions Estimator (Opgee): Validation, Modeling, and System Design.
Long, Wennan.

Improving the Oil Production Greenhouse Gas Emissions Estimator (Opgee): Validation, Modeling, and System Design. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 227 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-06, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Stanford University, 2023.

The global upstream greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the oil and gas industry, encompassing the extraction, processing, and delivery of crude petroleum to the refinery gates, account for about 15% of the total energy-related emissions. This represents a distressing 5.1 billion tonnes of GHG emissions [49]. These emissions, however, exhibit significant disparities across countries and operations due to varying Carbon Intensity (CI). It's observed that a country with high CI can produce emissions up to four times higher than those of a low CI country. Furthermore, operations involving significant flaring and onsite combustion for producing heavy oils or oil sands can show emissions up to ten times greater than fields without such practices. This study uses an in-house simulator, the Oil Production Greenhouse gas Emission Estimator (OPGEE), to analyze these emissions.Endorsed by regulators like the California Air Resources Board's Low-Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS), operators such as Chevron, consulting firms like McKinsey Energy Insights, financial institutes like S&P Global Platts, international organizations like the International Energy Agency (IEA), and NGOs like Rocky Mountain Institute's OCI+ and The Archie Initiative, OPGEE has proven its worth. This engineering-based, bottom-up lifecycle assessment (LCA) tool was designed to simulate upstream GHG emissions across four LCA stages: Exploration & Development, Production, Surface Processing, and Transportation [15]. It encompasses various production methods, including waterflooding, gasflooding, steamflooding, and gas lifting, as well as common surface operations like venting, flaring, and water & gas reinjection or disposal. This variety allows for comprehensive and precise modeling of various scenarios, enhancing our understanding of the upstream GHG emissions landscape.Each of these production methods necessitates substantial data input. While OPGEE provides default values for most required variables, these inputs and default values are primarily sourced from published literature. An inherent limitation of this approach is the potential disparity between the estimated carbon intensity (CI) and the actual emissions measured by the operators. To address this, Chapter 2 conducts a rigorous validation of OPGEE's steamflooding and waterflooding functionalities, as well as the associated processes. This validation is facilitated by the collection of detailed input data in collaboration with an operator, enabling a comparison of these production methods with selected fields operating in California's San Joaquin Valley. The results reveal approximately a 10% CI difference between OPGEE estimates and actual emissions. Notably, nearly 50% of the initial discrepancies can be traced back to OPGEE's usage of default literature values instead of actual field data. It is further discovered that differences in system boundaries and accounting methods account for about 30% of the variance. Additionally, the potential for mitigation pathways, such as incorporating solar photovoltaics into oil and gas operations, is examined, demonstrating a significant impact on CI.Upon model validation, the next step is to predict future emissions based on the current operation. Chapter 3 introduces a semi-conceptual model known as "Pattern-Based Modelling". This model allows history matching and future prediction for large-scale thermal enhanced oil recovery (TEOR) operations. Then, OPGEE generates a comprehensive CI profile of field production history. This chapter presents two case studies: the well-documented Kern River oilfield in California, U.S., and the relatively new Mukhaizna oilfield in Oman. The overall CI for Kern River varies between 10 to 40 gCO2eq./MJ over its operational lifespan, and the projected weighted CI until 2030 stays around 23 gCO2eq./MJ. The Mukhaizna field, however, exhibits a more narrow emission spectrum, ranging from 6 to 16 gCO2eq./MJ, with a future weighted CI until 2035 of approximately 14 gCO2eq./MJ.

ISBN: 9798381019964Subjects--Topical Terms:

559387
Gases.

Improving the Oil Production Greenhouse Gas Emissions Estimator (Opgee): Validation, Modeling, and System Design.
LDR:05210nmm a2200385 4500 001 2401327
005 20241022112137.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798381019964
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30726870
035 $a (MiAaPQ)STANFORDqt694nn1439
035 $a AAI30726870
035 $a 2401327
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Long, Wennan. $3 3771418
245 1 0 $a Improving the Oil Production Greenhouse Gas Emissions Estimator (Opgee): Validation, Modeling, and System Design.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 227 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-06, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Brandt, Adam;Azevedo, Ines;Kovscek, Anthony.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Stanford University, 2023.
520 $a The global upstream greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the oil and gas industry, encompassing the extraction, processing, and delivery of crude petroleum to the refinery gates, account for about 15% of the total energy-related emissions. This represents a distressing 5.1 billion tonnes of GHG emissions [49]. These emissions, however, exhibit significant disparities across countries and operations due to varying Carbon Intensity (CI). It's observed that a country with high CI can produce emissions up to four times higher than those of a low CI country. Furthermore, operations involving significant flaring and onsite combustion for producing heavy oils or oil sands can show emissions up to ten times greater than fields without such practices. This study uses an in-house simulator, the Oil Production Greenhouse gas Emission Estimator (OPGEE), to analyze these emissions.Endorsed by regulators like the California Air Resources Board's Low-Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS), operators such as Chevron, consulting firms like McKinsey Energy Insights, financial institutes like S&P Global Platts, international organizations like the International Energy Agency (IEA), and NGOs like Rocky Mountain Institute's OCI+ and The Archie Initiative, OPGEE has proven its worth. This engineering-based, bottom-up lifecycle assessment (LCA) tool was designed to simulate upstream GHG emissions across four LCA stages: Exploration & Development, Production, Surface Processing, and Transportation [15]. It encompasses various production methods, including waterflooding, gasflooding, steamflooding, and gas lifting, as well as common surface operations like venting, flaring, and water & gas reinjection or disposal. This variety allows for comprehensive and precise modeling of various scenarios, enhancing our understanding of the upstream GHG emissions landscape.Each of these production methods necessitates substantial data input. While OPGEE provides default values for most required variables, these inputs and default values are primarily sourced from published literature. An inherent limitation of this approach is the potential disparity between the estimated carbon intensity (CI) and the actual emissions measured by the operators. To address this, Chapter 2 conducts a rigorous validation of OPGEE's steamflooding and waterflooding functionalities, as well as the associated processes. This validation is facilitated by the collection of detailed input data in collaboration with an operator, enabling a comparison of these production methods with selected fields operating in California's San Joaquin Valley. The results reveal approximately a 10% CI difference between OPGEE estimates and actual emissions. Notably, nearly 50% of the initial discrepancies can be traced back to OPGEE's usage of default literature values instead of actual field data. It is further discovered that differences in system boundaries and accounting methods account for about 30% of the variance. Additionally, the potential for mitigation pathways, such as incorporating solar photovoltaics into oil and gas operations, is examined, demonstrating a significant impact on CI.Upon model validation, the next step is to predict future emissions based on the current operation. Chapter 3 introduces a semi-conceptual model known as "Pattern-Based Modelling". This model allows history matching and future prediction for large-scale thermal enhanced oil recovery (TEOR) operations. Then, OPGEE generates a comprehensive CI profile of field production history. This chapter presents two case studies: the well-documented Kern River oilfield in California, U.S., and the relatively new Mukhaizna oilfield in Oman. The overall CI for Kern River varies between 10 to 40 gCO2eq./MJ over its operational lifespan, and the projected weighted CI until 2030 stays around 23 gCO2eq./MJ. The Mukhaizna field, however, exhibits a more narrow emission spectrum, ranging from 6 to 16 gCO2eq./MJ, with a future weighted CI until 2035 of approximately 14 gCO2eq./MJ.
590 $a School code: 0212.
650 4 $a Gases. $3 559387
650 4 $a Creeks & streams. $3 3685269
650 4 $a Water treatment. $3 3683746
650 4 $a Floods. $3 549458
650 4 $a Emissions. $3 3559499
650 4 $a Enhanced oil recovery. $3 1457945
650 4 $a Energy consumption. $3 631630
650 4 $a Permeability. $3 915594
650 4 $a Systems design. $3 3433840
650 4 $a Aquatic sciences. $3 3174300
650 4 $a Design. $3 518875
650 4 $a Energy. $3 876794
650 4 $a Environmental engineering. $3 548583
650 4 $a Petroleum engineering. $3 566616
650 4 $a Water resources management. $3 794747
690 $a 0792
690 $a 0389
690 $a 0791
690 $a 0775
690 $a 0765
690 $a 0595
710 2 $a Stanford University. $3 754827
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-06A.
790 $a 0212
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30726870