東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

SPACs: An Alternative Investment Veh...

Anup, Nitusha.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

SPACs: An Alternative Investment Vehicle.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	SPACs: An Alternative Investment Vehicle./
作者:	Anup, Nitusha.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
面頁冊數:	49 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-10.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International85-10.
標題:	Investments. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30941747
ISBN:	9798382134666

SPACs: An Alternative Investment Vehicle.
Anup, Nitusha.

SPACs: An Alternative Investment Vehicle. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 49 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-10.

Thesis (M.A.)--Universidade do Porto (Portugal), 2016.

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (hereafter SPACs) well known as blind pool or blank check companies are defined, in a simple way, as alternative way to access the public markets. Since SPACs are becoming an increasingly popular alternative investment vehicle as they are a meritorious entity to substitute the presence of private equity in some segments of the market (Reimer 2007), this study is dedicated to analyze the returns for investors and clarify the impact that the market prices have in the decision of the investors. This topic assumes a particular importance for investors,managers, shareholders, and founders to understand how the decision-making process works in this kind of "blind pool" investments. Similar study (Jenkinson and Sousa,2011) has been done for the period between 2003 and 2006 and concluded that investor should listen to the market while approving/rejecting proposed deals. Our sample expands the time frame for the period between 2007 and 2013, in order to identify if the changes occurred, after 2007, in the SPACs structure changed the way the investors take their decisions and started taking into account the information imbedded in market prices at the decision date. Our study clearly demonstrates that neither the alert of Jenkinson and Sousa (2011) nor the changes in the SPACs structure change the behavior of investors and so investors are still not listening to the market and approving value destroying deals.

ISBN: 9798382134666Subjects--Topical Terms:

566987
Investments.

SPACs: An Alternative Investment Vehicle.
LDR:02431nmm a2200313 4500 001 2400842
005 20240930130044.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798382134666
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30941747
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Portugal1021685999
035 $a AAI30941747
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Anup, Nitusha. $3 3770905
245 1 0 $a SPACs: An Alternative Investment Vehicle.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 49 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-10.
500 $a Advisor: Sousa, Miguel Augusto Gomes;Fortuna, Natercia Silva.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Universidade do Porto (Portugal), 2016.
520 $a Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (hereafter SPACs) well known as blind pool or blank check companies are defined, in a simple way, as alternative way to access the public markets. Since SPACs are becoming an increasingly popular alternative investment vehicle as they are a meritorious entity to substitute the presence of private equity in some segments of the market (Reimer 2007), this study is dedicated to analyze the returns for investors and clarify the impact that the market prices have in the decision of the investors. This topic assumes a particular importance for investors,managers, shareholders, and founders to understand how the decision-making process works in this kind of "blind pool" investments. Similar study (Jenkinson and Sousa,2011) has been done for the period between 2003 and 2006 and concluded that investor should listen to the market while approving/rejecting proposed deals. Our sample expands the time frame for the period between 2007 and 2013, in order to identify if the changes occurred, after 2007, in the SPACs structure changed the way the investors take their decisions and started taking into account the information imbedded in market prices at the decision date. Our study clearly demonstrates that neither the alert of Jenkinson and Sousa (2011) nor the changes in the SPACs structure change the behavior of investors and so investors are still not listening to the market and approving value destroying deals.
590 $a School code: 5896.
650 4 $a Investments. $3 566987
650 4 $a Decision making. $3 517204
650 4 $a Investors. $3 3544951
650 4 $a Finance. $3 542899
690 $a 0508
710 2 $a Universidade do Porto (Portugal). $3 3348738
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 85-10.
790 $a 5896
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30941747