東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Constituent Ontologies and the Unity...

Staron, Michael.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Constituent Ontologies and the Unity Problem: A Thomistic Analysis.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Constituent Ontologies and the Unity Problem: A Thomistic Analysis./
作者:	Staron, Michael.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2024,
面頁冊數:	360 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-11A.
標題:	Philosophy. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31238067
ISBN:	9798382595542

Constituent Ontologies and the Unity Problem: A Thomistic Analysis.
Staron, Michael.

Constituent Ontologies and the Unity Problem: A Thomistic Analysis. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024 - 360 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Catholic University of America, 2024.

In the history of metaphysics, many philosophers have formulated theories about the natures of, and the relationship between, substances (e.g., humans, animals, and plants) and their attributes (e.g., their colors, shapes, and weights). In contemporary metaphysics, one prominent position on the relationship between substances and their attributes is called "Constituent Ontology." According to Constituent ontologists, the attributes of a substance are intrinsic to the substance, so that the substance can be thought of as a "whole" in relation to its attributes as "parts" or "constituents." Once, however, we view a substance as a whole composed of different constituents, what is the basis of unity for substances? Call this the "Unity Problem." This dissertation raises the Unity Problem for Constituent Ontologies in contemporary metaphysics. As I show, Constituent ontologists in contemporary metaphysics-specifically, "Bundle" and "Bare Particular" theorists-do not have an adequate solution to the Unity Problem. To solve the Unity Problem, I turn to the thought of Thomas Aquinas and develop his account of the different act-potency relations which explain the unity of substances. After articulating Aquinas's account of the different act-potency relations, I critique the most philosophically viable Constituent Ontologies in contemporary metaphysics-namely, Peter Simons' "Nuclear Theory" and J. P. Moreland's version of "Bare Particular Theory"-showing their inability to incorporate the act-potency relations and, consequently, their inability to solve the Unity Problem. I show that some common presuppositions shared by Constituent ontologists in contemporary metaphysics must be abandoned to maintain a tenable Constituent Ontology which endorses Aquinas's solution to the Unity Problem.

ISBN: 9798382595542Subjects--Topical Terms:

516511
Philosophy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Act

Constituent Ontologies and the Unity Problem: A Thomistic Analysis.
LDR:02924nmm a2200385 4500 001 2399790
005 20240916070011.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2024 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798382595542
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31238067
035 $a AAI31238067
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Staron, Michael. $3 3769765
245 1 0 $a Constituent Ontologies and the Unity Problem: A Thomistic Analysis.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 360 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Gorman, Michael.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Catholic University of America, 2024.
520 $a In the history of metaphysics, many philosophers have formulated theories about the natures of, and the relationship between, substances (e.g., humans, animals, and plants) and their attributes (e.g., their colors, shapes, and weights). In contemporary metaphysics, one prominent position on the relationship between substances and their attributes is called "Constituent Ontology." According to Constituent ontologists, the attributes of a substance are intrinsic to the substance, so that the substance can be thought of as a "whole" in relation to its attributes as "parts" or "constituents." Once, however, we view a substance as a whole composed of different constituents, what is the basis of unity for substances? Call this the "Unity Problem." This dissertation raises the Unity Problem for Constituent Ontologies in contemporary metaphysics. As I show, Constituent ontologists in contemporary metaphysics-specifically, "Bundle" and "Bare Particular" theorists-do not have an adequate solution to the Unity Problem. To solve the Unity Problem, I turn to the thought of Thomas Aquinas and develop his account of the different act-potency relations which explain the unity of substances. After articulating Aquinas's account of the different act-potency relations, I critique the most philosophically viable Constituent Ontologies in contemporary metaphysics-namely, Peter Simons' "Nuclear Theory" and J. P. Moreland's version of "Bare Particular Theory"-showing their inability to incorporate the act-potency relations and, consequently, their inability to solve the Unity Problem. I show that some common presuppositions shared by Constituent ontologists in contemporary metaphysics must be abandoned to maintain a tenable Constituent Ontology which endorses Aquinas's solution to the Unity Problem.
590 $a School code: 0043.
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Metaphysics. $3 517082
650 4 $a Sociology. $3 516174
653 $a Act
653 $a Bare Particular Theory
653 $a Bundle
653 $a Potency
653 $a Unity
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0396
690 $a 0626
710 2 $a The Catholic University of America. $b Philosophy. $3 1669622
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-11A.
790 $a 0043
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31238067