東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Exploring Design Education in the Ag...

Chacko, Aakansha Susan.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Exploring Design Education in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities and Challenges.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Exploring Design Education in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities and Challenges./
Author:	Chacko, Aakansha Susan.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2024,
Description:	72 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International85-11.
Subject:	Design. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31146697
ISBN:	9798382395562

Exploring Design Education in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities and Challenges.
Chacko, Aakansha Susan.

Exploring Design Education in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities and Challenges. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024 - 72 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11.

Thesis (M.A.)--Georgetown University, 2024.

This thesis aims to understand the implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI) on design education resulting from the rapid proliferation and advancement of Gen-AI tools over the last year. Having been recognized for its creative opportunities and capacity for efficiency through automation, Gen-AI has been increasingly adopted into professional creative practice. Tools like ChatGPT, Dall-E, and Midjourney can generate written copy and complex visual artifacts in seconds, altering parts of the "traditional" multi-step design process. This calls into question the current status of design pedagogy in relation to evolving technology and the value of a post-secondary design education. The disconnect between design in academia and the evolution of what it means to be a designer in industry is used to highlight the rift between product and process-oriented pedagogical design approaches. While some academic programs train students to be skilled craftsmen, industry increasingly expects technically skilled and interdisciplinary designers. Gen-AI is identified as a potential step towards fixing this product/process split by offering support through the automation of technical design processes and other time-intensive practices, making time to focus on developing the foregone interdisciplinary skills to strengthen design outcomes. This research specifically looks to understand this tension through discussions on Gen-AI's impact on student learning and skill development from a faculty perspective. The semi-structured interviews with twelve design educators from six universities aims to understand faculty's overarching perceptions of Gen-AI,{A0}how they navigate the use of Gen-AI within their unique design specializations, and their view of its impact on the future of their design specialization. In our conversations, educators emphasized that Gen-AI's impact is minimal in its current functionality. Furthermore, both faculty and students are still in the experimentation phase of finding ways it works best for their unique needs. However, many faculty did acknowledge the likelihood of Gen-AI evolving the creative process over time by solving certain problems, but also, potentially creating new ones.{A0}

ISBN: 9798382395562Subjects--Topical Terms:

518875
Design.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Design education

Exploring Design Education in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities and Challenges.
LDR:03420nmm a2200397 4500 001 2399616
005 20240916075419.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2024 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798382395562
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31146697
035 $a AAI31146697
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Chacko, Aakansha Susan. $0 (orcid)0009-0005-0166-2764 $3 3769585
245 1 0 $a Exploring Design Education in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities and Challenges.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 72 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11.
500 $a Advisor: Barba, Evan.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Georgetown University, 2024.
520 $a This thesis aims to understand the implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI) on design education resulting from the rapid proliferation and advancement of Gen-AI tools over the last year. Having been recognized for its creative opportunities and capacity for efficiency through automation, Gen-AI has been increasingly adopted into professional creative practice. Tools like ChatGPT, Dall-E, and Midjourney can generate written copy and complex visual artifacts in seconds, altering parts of the "traditional" multi-step design process. This calls into question the current status of design pedagogy in relation to evolving technology and the value of a post-secondary design education. The disconnect between design in academia and the evolution of what it means to be a designer in industry is used to highlight the rift between product and process-oriented pedagogical design approaches. While some academic programs train students to be skilled craftsmen, industry increasingly expects technically skilled and interdisciplinary designers. Gen-AI is identified as a potential step towards fixing this product/process split by offering support through the automation of technical design processes and other time-intensive practices, making time to focus on developing the foregone interdisciplinary skills to strengthen design outcomes. This research specifically looks to understand this tension through discussions on Gen-AI's impact on student learning and skill development from a faculty perspective. The semi-structured interviews with twelve design educators from six universities aims to understand faculty's overarching perceptions of Gen-AI,{A0}how they navigate the use of Gen-AI within their unique design specializations, and their view of its impact on the future of their design specialization. In our conversations, educators emphasized that Gen-AI's impact is minimal in its current functionality. Furthermore, both faculty and students are still in the experimentation phase of finding ways it works best for their unique needs. However, many faculty did acknowledge the likelihood of Gen-AI evolving the creative process over time by solving certain problems, but also, potentially creating new ones.{A0}
590 $a School code: 0076.
650 4 $a Design. $3 518875
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
650 4 $a Art education. $3 547650
653 $a Design education
653 $a Interdisciplinary designers
653 $a Design tools
653 $a Generative AI
653 $a Evolving technology
690 $a 0389
690 $a 0800
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0273
710 2 $a Georgetown University. $b Communication, Culture & Technology. $3 1026672
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 85-11.
790 $a 0076
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2024
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31146697