東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Phoneme Similarity in English and Ma...

Chen, Mo.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Phoneme Similarity in English and Mandarin Chinese Language Production.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Phoneme Similarity in English and Mandarin Chinese Language Production./
作者:	Chen, Mo.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
面頁冊數:	109 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International85-01.
標題:	Cognitive psychology. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30486364
ISBN:	9798379895617

Phoneme Similarity in English and Mandarin Chinese Language Production.
Chen, Mo.

Phoneme Similarity in English and Mandarin Chinese Language Production. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 109 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01.

Thesis (M.S.)--Lehigh University, 2023.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Despite general agreement on the main stages of language production, the stage of phonetic encoding and articulation remains understudied. To shed light on this neglected component, more specifically the interaction of phonological units and articulatory features, this thesis studied the effects of initial phoneme similarity in controlled word-pair production experiments. I comprehensively examined the cost of different feature type differences in word onsets in parallel English and Mandarin Chinese word pair production experiments while also varying phonological contexts (presence or absence of shared rhyme segments). Monosyllabic word pairs were produced using a cued word-order procedure that requires the generation of phonology immediately before speaking. I predicted phoneme similarity costs for all features in both languages. The rhymed context should have more cost than the unrhymed context but keep the same pattern across features. Competition indexed by slower speech initiation latencies and increased errors was present in both rhymed (e.g., birch-perch, 笔(bi3)-皮(pi2)) and unrhymed (e.g., bog-pouch 部(bu4)-帕(pa4)) related conditions in both languages. Surprisingly, for unrhymed word pairs, place was the most influential feature in both languages. For rhymed word pairs, all features were important, place remained the most robust effect in Chinese, but voice was the strongest feature in English. Error patterns were broadly consistent with the response time data. I conclude that the phoneme similarity effect operates both in a syllable-centric (Chinese) as well as a phoneme-centric (English) phonological system, suggesting a limited role for earlier production stages.

ISBN: 9798379895617Subjects--Topical Terms:

523881
Cognitive psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

English

Phoneme Similarity in English and Mandarin Chinese Language Production.
LDR:02861nmm a2200385 4500 001 2398021
005 20240711092045.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798379895617
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30486364
035 $a AAI30486364
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Chen, Mo. $3 3350259
245 1 0 $a Phoneme Similarity in English and Mandarin Chinese Language Production.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 109 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01.
500 $a Advisor: O'Seaghdha, Padraig G.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Lehigh University, 2023.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Despite general agreement on the main stages of language production, the stage of phonetic encoding and articulation remains understudied. To shed light on this neglected component, more specifically the interaction of phonological units and articulatory features, this thesis studied the effects of initial phoneme similarity in controlled word-pair production experiments. I comprehensively examined the cost of different feature type differences in word onsets in parallel English and Mandarin Chinese word pair production experiments while also varying phonological contexts (presence or absence of shared rhyme segments). Monosyllabic word pairs were produced using a cued word-order procedure that requires the generation of phonology immediately before speaking. I predicted phoneme similarity costs for all features in both languages. The rhymed context should have more cost than the unrhymed context but keep the same pattern across features. Competition indexed by slower speech initiation latencies and increased errors was present in both rhymed (e.g., birch-perch, 笔(bi3)-皮(pi2)) and unrhymed (e.g., bog-pouch 部(bu4)-帕(pa4)) related conditions in both languages. Surprisingly, for unrhymed word pairs, place was the most influential feature in both languages. For rhymed word pairs, all features were important, place remained the most robust effect in Chinese, but voice was the strongest feature in English. Error patterns were broadly consistent with the response time data. I conclude that the phoneme similarity effect operates both in a syllable-centric (Chinese) as well as a phoneme-centric (English) phonological system, suggesting a limited role for earlier production stages.
590 $a School code: 0105.
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 523881
650 4 $a Language. $3 643551
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
653 $a English
653 $a Language production
653 $a Mandarin
653 $a Phoneme similarity effect
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0679
690 $a 0290
710 2 $a Lehigh University. $b Psychology. $3 1675255
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 85-01.
790 $a 0105
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30486364