東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Equity Measures in Higher Education ...

Hall, Lauren Ashley.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Equity Measures in Higher Education Performance-Based Funding Systems: Building a Typology, Exploring Policy Adoptions, and Evaluating Policy Impacts.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Equity Measures in Higher Education Performance-Based Funding Systems: Building a Typology, Exploring Policy Adoptions, and Evaluating Policy Impacts./
作者:	Hall, Lauren Ashley.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
面頁冊數:	201 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-01A.
標題:	Public policy. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30419775
ISBN:	9798379794279

Equity Measures in Higher Education Performance-Based Funding Systems: Building a Typology, Exploring Policy Adoptions, and Evaluating Policy Impacts.
Hall, Lauren Ashley.

Equity Measures in Higher Education Performance-Based Funding Systems: Building a Typology, Exploring Policy Adoptions, and Evaluating Policy Impacts. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 201 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 2023.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Performance-based funding (PBF) policies that closely link higher education funding to performance metrics are common in the United States. Similar to other performance management systems, evidence suggests PBF policies have unintended impacts, such as cream-skimming. More specifically, evidence shows the fiscal incentives of PBF encourage institutions to enroll students who have the highest probabilities of success, thereby limiting access to higher education for certain student populations. To counteract perverse enrollment incentives, some states include equity measures in their PBF formulas. Equity measures are components of PBF policies that serve to counteract the incentives to increase selectivity in the admissions process. These equity measures provide additional weight in the state funding formula for targeted groups' performance. The first chapter of this dissertation provides a conceptual step forward by building a theory-driven typology of PBF equity measures. Findings show that states favor equity measures that target socioeconomic status rather than socio-demographic characteristics, although results vary by sector. The second chapter treats this typology as a set of competing policy options available to states. I utilize a Cox proportional hazards model to estimate the likelihood of states' adoptions of PBF with and without equity measures. The results suggest that common policy adoption predictors have differential impacts on states' choices among competing policy options. Moreover, the political affiliation of state leadership, diversity in the state legislature, and HBCU representation may influence which type of policy states adopt among competing policy options. The final chapter uses a dynamic difference-in-differences estimator to test the impact of PBF equity measures on enrollments of Black, Hispanic/Latina, and low-income students at four-year institutions. Results show that PBF equity measures do not mitigate the cream-skimming admissions practices that reduce enrollments of low-income and underrepresented minority students. Taken together, the chapters in this dissertation offer theoretical and policy-relevant contributions.

ISBN: 9798379794279Subjects--Topical Terms:

532803
Public policy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Difference-in-differences

Equity Measures in Higher Education Performance-Based Funding Systems: Building a Typology, Exploring Policy Adoptions, and Evaluating Policy Impacts.
LDR:03580nmm a2200421 4500 001 2398006
005 20240711092040.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798379794279
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30419775
035 $a AAI30419775
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hall, Lauren Ashley. $3 3767915
245 1 0 $a Equity Measures in Higher Education Performance-Based Funding Systems: Building a Typology, Exploring Policy Adoptions, and Evaluating Policy Impacts.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 201 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Arnold Lincove, Jane.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 2023.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Performance-based funding (PBF) policies that closely link higher education funding to performance metrics are common in the United States. Similar to other performance management systems, evidence suggests PBF policies have unintended impacts, such as cream-skimming. More specifically, evidence shows the fiscal incentives of PBF encourage institutions to enroll students who have the highest probabilities of success, thereby limiting access to higher education for certain student populations. To counteract perverse enrollment incentives, some states include equity measures in their PBF formulas. Equity measures are components of PBF policies that serve to counteract the incentives to increase selectivity in the admissions process. These equity measures provide additional weight in the state funding formula for targeted groups' performance. The first chapter of this dissertation provides a conceptual step forward by building a theory-driven typology of PBF equity measures. Findings show that states favor equity measures that target socioeconomic status rather than socio-demographic characteristics, although results vary by sector. The second chapter treats this typology as a set of competing policy options available to states. I utilize a Cox proportional hazards model to estimate the likelihood of states' adoptions of PBF with and without equity measures. The results suggest that common policy adoption predictors have differential impacts on states' choices among competing policy options. Moreover, the political affiliation of state leadership, diversity in the state legislature, and HBCU representation may influence which type of policy states adopt among competing policy options. The final chapter uses a dynamic difference-in-differences estimator to test the impact of PBF equity measures on enrollments of Black, Hispanic/Latina, and low-income students at four-year institutions. Results show that PBF equity measures do not mitigate the cream-skimming admissions practices that reduce enrollments of low-income and underrepresented minority students. Taken together, the chapters in this dissertation offer theoretical and policy-relevant contributions.
590 $a School code: 0434.
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
650 4 $a Education finance. $3 3172165
650 4 $a Educational evaluation. $3 526425
650 4 $a Higher education administration. $3 2122863
653 $a Difference-in-differences
653 $a Equity
653 $a Higher education finance
653 $a Higher education policy
653 $a Performance funding
653 $a Survival analysis
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0277
690 $a 0443
690 $a 0446
710 2 $a University of Maryland, Baltimore County. $b Public Policy. $3 1027954
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-01A.
790 $a 0434
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30419775