東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Teaching Methods in Mathematics and ...

Tubbs, Lillian.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Teaching Methods in Mathematics and Their Impact on Sixth-Grade Students' Mathematics Anxiety, Attitudes, and Achievement.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Teaching Methods in Mathematics and Their Impact on Sixth-Grade Students' Mathematics Anxiety, Attitudes, and Achievement./
Author:	Tubbs, Lillian.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2014,
Description:	142 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 76-04, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International76-04A.
標題:	Mathematics education. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3582802
ISBN:	9781321221916

Teaching Methods in Mathematics and Their Impact on Sixth-Grade Students' Mathematics Anxiety, Attitudes, and Achievement.
Tubbs, Lillian.

Teaching Methods in Mathematics and Their Impact on Sixth-Grade Students' Mathematics Anxiety, Attitudes, and Achievement. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2014 - 142 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 76-04, Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Union University, 2014.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The focus of this study was to determine if statistical significant differences occurred in sixth grade ability-grouped students' mathematics anxiety, attitude towards mathematics, and mathematics achievement when taught by three different teaching methods. Additionally, it was questioned as to whether gender affected the outcomes. Three different assessments were utilized in this quasi-experimental, nonrandomized control group, pretest-posttest design study. The 67 participants were taught using three instructional approaches: (a) technology-based instruction, (b) multiple intelligence-based instruction, or (c) traditional-based instruction. The Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale and the Attitude Toward Mathematics Inventory, as well as the Foundations of Algebra Assessment were utilized to determine significance. Using a three-way MANOVA, the results showed that collectively, significance was seen in gender and the interaction of method and ability group. Moreover, the interaction of teaching method, ability group, and gender also showed significance. When the analysis was performed on the independent variables, results showed significance was observed in male and female attitudes. Males showed preference for the technology-based instruction while females showed preference for the multiple intelligence-based instruction. Furthermore, significance in attitude was observed with ability groups. High ability students and average ability students favored the technology approach while low ability students favored the multiple intelligence approach. Significance was also apparent when teaching methods were compared. Both males and females scored significantly higher with the traditional approach. When the interaction of teaching method, ability group, and gender was analyzed, attitude for males and females exhibited significance. High ability male students preferred the technology approach while average ability male students preferred the traditional approach. Somewhat similar, low ability male students preferred both the multiple intelligence approach and the traditional approach. Attitude for high ability female students showed significance with the multiple intelligence method, whereas attitude for average ability female students showed significance with the technology approach. Attitude for low ability female students showed significance for the multiple intelligence approach. When ability group with achievement was compared, high ability students scored significantly higher than average ability students and low ability students. No significance occurred when anxiety was examined.

ISBN: 9781321221916Subjects--Topical Terms:

641129
Mathematics education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Ability groups

Teaching Methods in Mathematics and Their Impact on Sixth-Grade Students' Mathematics Anxiety, Attitudes, and Achievement.
LDR:03992nmm a2200433 4500 001 2397136
005 20240617111745.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321221916
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3582802
035 $a AAI3582802
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Tubbs, Lillian. $3 3766901
245 1 0 $a Teaching Methods in Mathematics and Their Impact on Sixth-Grade Students' Mathematics Anxiety, Attitudes, and Achievement.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2014
300 $a 142 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 76-04, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Singleton, Ann.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Union University, 2014.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The focus of this study was to determine if statistical significant differences occurred in sixth grade ability-grouped students' mathematics anxiety, attitude towards mathematics, and mathematics achievement when taught by three different teaching methods. Additionally, it was questioned as to whether gender affected the outcomes. Three different assessments were utilized in this quasi-experimental, nonrandomized control group, pretest-posttest design study. The 67 participants were taught using three instructional approaches: (a) technology-based instruction, (b) multiple intelligence-based instruction, or (c) traditional-based instruction. The Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale and the Attitude Toward Mathematics Inventory, as well as the Foundations of Algebra Assessment were utilized to determine significance. Using a three-way MANOVA, the results showed that collectively, significance was seen in gender and the interaction of method and ability group. Moreover, the interaction of teaching method, ability group, and gender also showed significance. When the analysis was performed on the independent variables, results showed significance was observed in male and female attitudes. Males showed preference for the technology-based instruction while females showed preference for the multiple intelligence-based instruction. Furthermore, significance in attitude was observed with ability groups. High ability students and average ability students favored the technology approach while low ability students favored the multiple intelligence approach. Significance was also apparent when teaching methods were compared. Both males and females scored significantly higher with the traditional approach. When the interaction of teaching method, ability group, and gender was analyzed, attitude for males and females exhibited significance. High ability male students preferred the technology approach while average ability male students preferred the traditional approach. Somewhat similar, low ability male students preferred both the multiple intelligence approach and the traditional approach. Attitude for high ability female students showed significance with the multiple intelligence method, whereas attitude for average ability female students showed significance with the technology approach. Attitude for low ability female students showed significance for the multiple intelligence approach. When ability group with achievement was compared, high ability students scored significantly higher than average ability students and low ability students. No significance occurred when anxiety was examined.
590 $a School code: 1485.
650 4 $a Mathematics education. $3 641129
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 517650
650 4 $a Curriculum development. $3 684418
650 4 $a Middle school education. $3 969762
653 $a Ability groups
653 $a Mathematics
653 $a Mathematics teaching methods
653 $a Middle school
653 $a Multiple intelligences
653 $a Technology
690 $a 0280
690 $a 0450
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0727
710 2 $a Union University. $b Educational Leadership. $3 2105122
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 76-04A.
790 $a 1485
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3582802