東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Exploring the Use of Oral Formative ...

Allen, Lydia Angelea.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Exploring the Use of Oral Formative Assessment in the Secondary Mathematics Classroom.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Exploring the Use of Oral Formative Assessment in the Secondary Mathematics Classroom./
Author:	Allen, Lydia Angelea.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2022,
Description:	118 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International84-02.
Subject:	Problem solving. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29228676
ISBN:	9798841531128

Exploring the Use of Oral Formative Assessment in the Secondary Mathematics Classroom.
Allen, Lydia Angelea.

Exploring the Use of Oral Formative Assessment in the Secondary Mathematics Classroom. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2022 - 118 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02.

Thesis (M.Sc.)--North Carolina State University, 2022.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The purpose of this study is to explore the use of oral formative assessment in secondary mathematics classrooms as a link between conceptual understanding and procedural fluency. While oral formative assessment is not new to mathematics education, it has not been widely studied or implemented at the secondary level. The present study specifically investigates the use of oral formative assessment in an Advanced Placement (AP) Statistics course during a unit of study on the normal distribution. The study examines conceptual knowledge as demonstrated by an oral assessment, and then explores how that knowledge translates to procedural proficiency on a written assessment.The participants in this study were fifteen AP Statistics students in a public high school in North Carolina. The data collected in this study consisted of oral formative assessments recorded individually by each student and written formative assessments taken by each student during class time.The conceptual framework for the study considers Star's (2005) and Baroody et al.'s (2007) work on types and qualities of demonstrated knowledge in mathematics. Students' oral assessment data was analyzed for evidence of superficial procedural knowledge, deep procedural knowledge, superficial conceptual knowledge, and deep conceptual knowledge. Students' demonstrated knowledge was then compared to their proficiency on the written assessment.Findings from the study suggest that students who demonstrate deep conceptual knowledge in an oral assessment also tend to demonstrate high proficiency on written assessments. That being said, students who demonstrate superficial procedural knowledge in an oral assessment do not necessarily demonstrate low proficiency on written assessments. Whiledemonstrated knowledge on oral formative assessments is not determinative of proficiency on written assessments, it does provide teachers with a unique perspective as to how their students are thinking and reasoning mathematically. The mathematics education community can use studies such as this for insights into the way that oral formative assessment can reveal and promote students' conceptual understanding.

ISBN: 9798841531128Subjects--Topical Terms:

516855
Problem solving.

Exploring the Use of Oral Formative Assessment in the Secondary Mathematics Classroom.
LDR:03393nmm a2200409 4500 001 2396004
005 20240603070927.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2022 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798841531128
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29228676
035 $a (MiAaPQ)NCState_Univ18402039589
035 $a AAI29228676
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Allen, Lydia Angelea. $3 3765526
245 1 0 $a Exploring the Use of Oral Formative Assessment in the Secondary Mathematics Classroom.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2022
300 $a 118 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02.
500 $a Advisor: Anderson, Robin;Fenn, Molly.
502 $a Thesis (M.Sc.)--North Carolina State University, 2022.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The purpose of this study is to explore the use of oral formative assessment in secondary mathematics classrooms as a link between conceptual understanding and procedural fluency. While oral formative assessment is not new to mathematics education, it has not been widely studied or implemented at the secondary level. The present study specifically investigates the use of oral formative assessment in an Advanced Placement (AP) Statistics course during a unit of study on the normal distribution. The study examines conceptual knowledge as demonstrated by an oral assessment, and then explores how that knowledge translates to procedural proficiency on a written assessment.The participants in this study were fifteen AP Statistics students in a public high school in North Carolina. The data collected in this study consisted of oral formative assessments recorded individually by each student and written formative assessments taken by each student during class time.The conceptual framework for the study considers Star's (2005) and Baroody et al.'s (2007) work on types and qualities of demonstrated knowledge in mathematics. Students' oral assessment data was analyzed for evidence of superficial procedural knowledge, deep procedural knowledge, superficial conceptual knowledge, and deep conceptual knowledge. Students' demonstrated knowledge was then compared to their proficiency on the written assessment.Findings from the study suggest that students who demonstrate deep conceptual knowledge in an oral assessment also tend to demonstrate high proficiency on written assessments. That being said, students who demonstrate superficial procedural knowledge in an oral assessment do not necessarily demonstrate low proficiency on written assessments. Whiledemonstrated knowledge on oral formative assessments is not determinative of proficiency on written assessments, it does provide teachers with a unique perspective as to how their students are thinking and reasoning mathematically. The mathematics education community can use studies such as this for insights into the way that oral formative assessment can reveal and promote students' conceptual understanding.
590 $a School code: 0155.
650 4 $a Problem solving. $3 516855
650 4 $a Teaching. $3 517098
650 4 $a Classrooms. $3 1598668
650 4 $a Success. $3 518195
650 4 $a Video recordings. $3 575241
650 4 $a Normal distribution. $3 3561025
650 4 $a Mathematics education. $3 641129
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
650 4 $a Confidence. $3 682645
650 4 $a Cognitive ability. $3 3560491
650 4 $a Teachers. $3 529573
650 4 $a Cognition & reasoning. $3 3556293
650 4 $a COVID-19. $3 3554449
650 4 $a Accountability. $3 3435301
650 4 $a Skills. $3 3221615
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 523881
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
650 4 $a Mathematics. $3 515831
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
650 4 $a Statistics. $3 517247
690 $a 0280
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0338
690 $a 0405
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0463
710 2 $a North Carolina State University. $3 1018772
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 84-02.
790 $a 0155
791 $a M.Sc.
792 $a 2022
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29228676