東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

The role of trust as a mediator betw...

Chancey, Eric T.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The role of trust as a mediator between system characteristics and response behaviors.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The role of trust as a mediator between system characteristics and response behaviors./
Author:	Chancey, Eric T.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2013,
Description:	117 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 75-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International75-03.
Subject:	Experimental psychology. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1522987
ISBN:	9781303166266

The role of trust as a mediator between system characteristics and response behaviors.
Chancey, Eric T.

The role of trust as a mediator between system characteristics and response behaviors. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2013 - 117 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 75-03.

Thesis (M.S.)--Old Dominion University, 2013.

This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.

There have been several theoretical frameworks that acknowledge trust as a prime mediator between system characteristics and automation reliance. Some researchers have operationally defined trust as the behavior exhibited. Other researchers have suggested that although trust may guide operator response behaviors, trust does not completely determine the behavior and advocate the use of subjective measures of trust. Recently, several studies accounting for temporal precedence failed to confirm that trust mediated the relationship between system characteristics and response behavior. The purpose of the current work was to clarify the roles that trust plays in response behavior when interacting with a signaling system. Forty-four participants interacted with a primary flight simulation task and a secondary signaling system task. The signaling system varied in reliability (90% and 60%) within subjects and error bias (false alarm prone and miss prone) between subjects. Analyses indicated that trust partially mediated the relationship between reliability and agreement rate. Trust did not, however, mediate the relationship between reliability and reaction time. Trust also did not mediate the relationships between error bias and reaction time or agreement rate. Analyses of variance generally supported specific behavioral and trust hypotheses, indicating that the paradigm employed produced similar effects on response behaviors and subjective estimates of trust observed in other studies. The results of this study indicate that other mediating variables may offer more predictive power in determining response behaviors. Additionally, strong assumptions of trust acting as the prime mediator and operationally defining trust as a type of behavior should be viewed with caution.

ISBN: 9781303166266Subjects--Topical Terms:

2144733
Experimental psychology.

The role of trust as a mediator between system characteristics and response behaviors.
LDR:02919nmm a2200337 4500 001 2395849
005 20240531084150.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303166266
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1522987
035 $a AAI1522987
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Chancey, Eric T. $3 3765354
245 1 0 $a The role of trust as a mediator between system characteristics and response behaviors.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2013
300 $a 117 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 75-03.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Bliss, James P.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Old Dominion University, 2013.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a There have been several theoretical frameworks that acknowledge trust as a prime mediator between system characteristics and automation reliance. Some researchers have operationally defined trust as the behavior exhibited. Other researchers have suggested that although trust may guide operator response behaviors, trust does not completely determine the behavior and advocate the use of subjective measures of trust. Recently, several studies accounting for temporal precedence failed to confirm that trust mediated the relationship between system characteristics and response behavior. The purpose of the current work was to clarify the roles that trust plays in response behavior when interacting with a signaling system. Forty-four participants interacted with a primary flight simulation task and a secondary signaling system task. The signaling system varied in reliability (90% and 60%) within subjects and error bias (false alarm prone and miss prone) between subjects. Analyses indicated that trust partially mediated the relationship between reliability and agreement rate. Trust did not, however, mediate the relationship between reliability and reaction time. Trust also did not mediate the relationships between error bias and reaction time or agreement rate. Analyses of variance generally supported specific behavioral and trust hypotheses, indicating that the paradigm employed produced similar effects on response behaviors and subjective estimates of trust observed in other studies. The results of this study indicate that other mediating variables may offer more predictive power in determining response behaviors. Additionally, strong assumptions of trust acting as the prime mediator and operationally defining trust as a type of behavior should be viewed with caution.
590 $a School code: 0418.
650 4 $a Experimental psychology. $3 2144733
690 $a 0623
710 2 $a Old Dominion University. $3 1020684
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 75-03.
790 $a 0418
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1522987