東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Building on Community Assets for Par...

Goldberg, Suzanne H.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Building on Community Assets for Participation in Local Land Use Decisions: Providing Technical Assistance in Rezonings.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Building on Community Assets for Participation in Local Land Use Decisions: Providing Technical Assistance in Rezonings./
Author:	Goldberg, Suzanne H.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
Description:	59 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-08.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International84-08.
Subject:	Urban planning. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30247025
ISBN:	9798368473277

Building on Community Assets for Participation in Local Land Use Decisions: Providing Technical Assistance in Rezonings.
Goldberg, Suzanne H.

Building on Community Assets for Participation in Local Land Use Decisions: Providing Technical Assistance in Rezonings. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 59 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-08.

Thesis (M.S.)--Pratt Institute, 2023.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

There is a lack of meaningful and sustained community participation in New York City land use decisions and the Uniform Land Use Review Procedure (ULURP) does not require adequate consideration of the adverse effects of rezonings. Currently, rezonings often advantage those seeking profit off of real estate development, rather than the interests of existing communities, which has resulted in the displacement of local businesses and residents. Decision-makers and developers frequently overlook or ignore the opinions and expertise of local residents within NYC land uses decisions, which ultimately results in inaccurate neighborhood-level information and the inequitable distribution of power in land use decision-making processes. Community-based organizations (CBOs) often advocate on behalf of residents and inform them of the effects of a ULURP decision. However, they are typically underfunded to do this type of work and/or lack the technical resources to engage with all aspects of ULURP to comprehensively advocate for their community's interests. The main purpose of this research is to examine the Neighborhoods First Fund's (NFF) role in providing grants for technical resources to CBOs to help build upon community assets in planning and organizing. Through a case study examining a collaboration between NFF and the Bronx Coalition for a Community Vision (BCCV) in response to the City's announcement of the Jerome Avenue Neighborhood Plan, this thesis uncovers the limitations of ULURP and recommends strategies for effective local participation and power sharing. A key aspect of these recommendations is the need to increase community power in planning and organizing in advance of City-led rezonings, rather than solely in response to them. There are many other flaws and inefficiencies within the ULURP process itself, however, this study examines a model for improving just one aspect of its structure through supporting community engagement and providing technical assistance for community advocacy.

ISBN: 9798368473277Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122922
Urban planning.
Subjects--Index Terms:

New York City

Building on Community Assets for Participation in Local Land Use Decisions: Providing Technical Assistance in Rezonings.
LDR:03189nmm a2200373 4500 001 2395462
005 20240517104559.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798368473277
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30247025
035 $a AAI30247025
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Goldberg, Suzanne H. $3 3764968
245 1 0 $a Building on Community Assets for Participation in Local Land Use Decisions: Providing Technical Assistance in Rezonings.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 59 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-08.
500 $a Advisor: Baron, Eve.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Pratt Institute, 2023.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a There is a lack of meaningful and sustained community participation in New York City land use decisions and the Uniform Land Use Review Procedure (ULURP) does not require adequate consideration of the adverse effects of rezonings. Currently, rezonings often advantage those seeking profit off of real estate development, rather than the interests of existing communities, which has resulted in the displacement of local businesses and residents. Decision-makers and developers frequently overlook or ignore the opinions and expertise of local residents within NYC land uses decisions, which ultimately results in inaccurate neighborhood-level information and the inequitable distribution of power in land use decision-making processes. Community-based organizations (CBOs) often advocate on behalf of residents and inform them of the effects of a ULURP decision. However, they are typically underfunded to do this type of work and/or lack the technical resources to engage with all aspects of ULURP to comprehensively advocate for their community's interests. The main purpose of this research is to examine the Neighborhoods First Fund's (NFF) role in providing grants for technical resources to CBOs to help build upon community assets in planning and organizing. Through a case study examining a collaboration between NFF and the Bronx Coalition for a Community Vision (BCCV) in response to the City's announcement of the Jerome Avenue Neighborhood Plan, this thesis uncovers the limitations of ULURP and recommends strategies for effective local participation and power sharing. A key aspect of these recommendations is the need to increase community power in planning and organizing in advance of City-led rezonings, rather than solely in response to them. There are many other flaws and inefficiencies within the ULURP process itself, however, this study examines a model for improving just one aspect of its structure through supporting community engagement and providing technical assistance for community advocacy.
590 $a School code: 1384.
650 4 $a Urban planning. $3 2122922
650 4 $a Area planning & development. $3 3172430
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
653 $a New York City
653 $a Land use decisions
653 $a Community participation
690 $a 0999
690 $a 0341
690 $a 0630
710 2 $a Pratt Institute. $b City and Regional Planning. $3 3695496
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 84-08.
790 $a 1384
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30247025