東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

How Students Seek and Use Writing Su...

Conrad, Nina.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

How Students Seek and Use Writing Support: Exploring the Spectrum of Literacy Brokering Practices in Higher Education.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	How Students Seek and Use Writing Support: Exploring the Spectrum of Literacy Brokering Practices in Higher Education./
Author:	Conrad, Nina.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2022,
Description:	354 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-06, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-06B.
Subject:	Higher education. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29998696
ISBN:	9798363507489

How Students Seek and Use Writing Support: Exploring the Spectrum of Literacy Brokering Practices in Higher Education.
Conrad, Nina.

How Students Seek and Use Writing Support: Exploring the Spectrum of Literacy Brokering Practices in Higher Education. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2022 - 354 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-06, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2022.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Many students in higher education seek support with academic writing by engaging in literacy brokering, defined as third-party interventions in the creation of academic texts (Lillis & Curry, 2010). Such interventions may take many forms, from illicit practices such as purchasing a paper (see Newton & Lang, 2016) to innocuous practices such as receiving feedback from a friend or family member. While it is generally acknowledged that literacy brokers can have a significant role in mediating written texts, most previous research on this topic has focused on professionals' writing for publication (e.g. Lillis & Curry, 2006, 2010), and very little research has considered students' engagement in literacy brokering as such. In addition, research on specific types of student literacy brokering (e.g., proofreading; see Harwood et al., 2009, 2010) has given insufficient attention to issues of access and equity surrounding students' academic writing, specifically ways in which the social context may influence students' choice of literacy broker and reasons for seeking writing support.The aim of this mixed methods study was to examine how and why students in higher education engage in literacy brokering practices and what kinds of outcomes result from such practices. The study adopted an academic literacies approach, applying methods from social network analysis as well as constructs of identity (Ivanic, 2005) and indexicality (Bucholtz & Hall, 2004, 2005) to investigate students' pursuit of writing support as one dimension of their academic writing practices. In the first phase of the study, data collected via an online survey of undergraduate and graduate students (N = 241) were quantitatively analyzed to describe students' ways of engaging in literacy brokering and identify differences between demographic groups (domestic vs. international, multilingual vs. functionally monolingual) with respect to relevant aspects of social network structure (e.g., access to writing support, network density). In the second phase of the study, students' literacy brokering practices and reasons for pursuing such support were further explored through interviews with select survey respondents (N = 8) and their instructors and writing tutors (N = 4), a survey of instructors (N = 7), and an analysis of feedback and revisions on students' written texts (N = 17). The study identifies common forms of literacy brokering and indicates how access to social resources may inform students' ways of seeking writing support. In addition, it illustrates how socially constructed expectations and beliefs about writing shape students' practices of writing and revision, which in turn contribute to their identities as students, writers, and members of disciplinary communities.

ISBN: 9798363507489Subjects--Topical Terms:

641065
Higher education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Academic writing

How Students Seek and Use Writing Support: Exploring the Spectrum of Literacy Brokering Practices in Higher Education.
LDR:04041nmm a2200397 4500 001 2394429
005 20240422070854.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2022 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798363507489
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29998696
035 $a AAI29998696
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Conrad, Nina. $3 3763903
245 1 0 $a How Students Seek and Use Writing Support: Exploring the Spectrum of Literacy Brokering Practices in Higher Education.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2022
300 $a 354 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-06, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Tardy, Christine.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2022.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Many students in higher education seek support with academic writing by engaging in literacy brokering, defined as third-party interventions in the creation of academic texts (Lillis & Curry, 2010). Such interventions may take many forms, from illicit practices such as purchasing a paper (see Newton & Lang, 2016) to innocuous practices such as receiving feedback from a friend or family member. While it is generally acknowledged that literacy brokers can have a significant role in mediating written texts, most previous research on this topic has focused on professionals' writing for publication (e.g. Lillis & Curry, 2006, 2010), and very little research has considered students' engagement in literacy brokering as such. In addition, research on specific types of student literacy brokering (e.g., proofreading; see Harwood et al., 2009, 2010) has given insufficient attention to issues of access and equity surrounding students' academic writing, specifically ways in which the social context may influence students' choice of literacy broker and reasons for seeking writing support.The aim of this mixed methods study was to examine how and why students in higher education engage in literacy brokering practices and what kinds of outcomes result from such practices. The study adopted an academic literacies approach, applying methods from social network analysis as well as constructs of identity (Ivanic, 2005) and indexicality (Bucholtz & Hall, 2004, 2005) to investigate students' pursuit of writing support as one dimension of their academic writing practices. In the first phase of the study, data collected via an online survey of undergraduate and graduate students (N = 241) were quantitatively analyzed to describe students' ways of engaging in literacy brokering and identify differences between demographic groups (domestic vs. international, multilingual vs. functionally monolingual) with respect to relevant aspects of social network structure (e.g., access to writing support, network density). In the second phase of the study, students' literacy brokering practices and reasons for pursuing such support were further explored through interviews with select survey respondents (N = 8) and their instructors and writing tutors (N = 4), a survey of instructors (N = 7), and an analysis of feedback and revisions on students' written texts (N = 17). The study identifies common forms of literacy brokering and indicates how access to social resources may inform students' ways of seeking writing support. In addition, it illustrates how socially constructed expectations and beliefs about writing shape students' practices of writing and revision, which in turn contribute to their identities as students, writers, and members of disciplinary communities.
590 $a School code: 0009.
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
650 4 $a Language. $3 643551
650 4 $a Language arts. $3 532624
650 4 $a Behavioral psychology. $3 2122788
653 $a Academic writing
653 $a Identity
653 $a Second-language writing
653 $a Social network analysis
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0679
690 $a 0279
690 $a 0384
710 2 $a The University of Arizona. $b Second Language Acquisition & Teaching. $3 1020442
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-06B.
790 $a 0009
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2022
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29998696