東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Relationships Between Watershed Fact...

Landreth, Jarrett Hunter.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Relationships Between Watershed Factors and Community Size Spectra of the Fish and Macroinvertebrate Communities of Mid-Appalachian Streams.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Relationships Between Watershed Factors and Community Size Spectra of the Fish and Macroinvertebrate Communities of Mid-Appalachian Streams./
Author:	Landreth, Jarrett Hunter.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
Description:	54 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-06.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International85-06.
Subject:	Software. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30726002
ISBN:	9798381019360

Relationships Between Watershed Factors and Community Size Spectra of the Fish and Macroinvertebrate Communities of Mid-Appalachian Streams.
Landreth, Jarrett Hunter.

Relationships Between Watershed Factors and Community Size Spectra of the Fish and Macroinvertebrate Communities of Mid-Appalachian Streams. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 54 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-06.

Thesis (M.Sc.)--West Virginia University, 2023.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Freshwater lotic communities are complex, dynamic, and quick to respond to changes to their environment. However, some of the specific mechanisms driving those changes are yet to be fully understood. Here, I will use the community size spectrum (CSS) approach to assess how the CSS slope, elevation, and food chain length of the fish and macroinvertebrate assemblages as well as the combined CSS of 15 mid-sized (2nd-4th order) streams in north-central West Virginia respond across gradients of watershed factors (drainage area, mean drainage slope, mean drainage elevation, drainage % forest, and stream specific conductance). Field sampling was carried out in summer of 2022, and laboratory analysis was completed in spring of 2023. Log2 size bins vs. log2densities were used to build CSS for each stream community. Results from the CSS were then used in an analytical procedure combining principal component analysis and univariate correlation which produced a set of significant correlations between certain watershed factors and CSS parameters that either followed established ecological knowledge or revealed caveats unique to the study design. Results provide evidence for including external watershed factors such as drainage elevation, slope, and land cover when assessing stream community structure as they could play a role in explaining variation between communities that cannot be accounted for by analyzing only biotic factors such as functional groups or diversity. Through this research, the community size spectrum approach to aquatic community assessment was shown as a valuable tool for stream ecologists due to its close link with changes to watersheds. It would be beneficial to add CSS to the repertoire of stream community assessment tools when seeking to better understand these diverse, dynamic, and vulnerable systems. Future research should focus on streams from a single major watershed to remove geographic location as a driver of variation so the importance of the other watershed factors on CSS parameters could be more effectively teased out, and then integrate these results into an analysis with well-studied biotic factors so that the level of explanatory power for each can be better understood. An ideal future goal for using CSS in stream community management would then be to develop a predictive model that can output estimated future CSS parameters (slope, elevation, and FCL) once biotic factors, geomorphology, and proposed land cover/water quality remediation effects are put into the model. This would give managers the capability to set targets for holistically improving community structure before breaking ground on any restoration/management projects along with thresholds for how much development can be done to a watershed before the stream community structure is significantly harmed.

ISBN: 9798381019360Subjects--Topical Terms:

619355
Software.

Relationships Between Watershed Factors and Community Size Spectra of the Fish and Macroinvertebrate Communities of Mid-Appalachian Streams.
LDR:04113nmm a2200421 4500 001 2393405
005 20240315085558.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798381019360
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30726002
035 $a (MiAaPQ)WVirginia12839
035 $a AAI30726002
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Landreth, Jarrett Hunter. $3 3762865
245 1 0 $a Relationships Between Watershed Factors and Community Size Spectra of the Fish and Macroinvertebrate Communities of Mid-Appalachian Streams.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 54 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-06.
500 $a Advisor: Murry, Brent;Arantes, Caroline.
502 $a Thesis (M.Sc.)--West Virginia University, 2023.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Freshwater lotic communities are complex, dynamic, and quick to respond to changes to their environment. However, some of the specific mechanisms driving those changes are yet to be fully understood. Here, I will use the community size spectrum (CSS) approach to assess how the CSS slope, elevation, and food chain length of the fish and macroinvertebrate assemblages as well as the combined CSS of 15 mid-sized (2nd-4th order) streams in north-central West Virginia respond across gradients of watershed factors (drainage area, mean drainage slope, mean drainage elevation, drainage % forest, and stream specific conductance). Field sampling was carried out in summer of 2022, and laboratory analysis was completed in spring of 2023. Log2 size bins vs. log2densities were used to build CSS for each stream community. Results from the CSS were then used in an analytical procedure combining principal component analysis and univariate correlation which produced a set of significant correlations between certain watershed factors and CSS parameters that either followed established ecological knowledge or revealed caveats unique to the study design. Results provide evidence for including external watershed factors such as drainage elevation, slope, and land cover when assessing stream community structure as they could play a role in explaining variation between communities that cannot be accounted for by analyzing only biotic factors such as functional groups or diversity. Through this research, the community size spectrum approach to aquatic community assessment was shown as a valuable tool for stream ecologists due to its close link with changes to watersheds. It would be beneficial to add CSS to the repertoire of stream community assessment tools when seeking to better understand these diverse, dynamic, and vulnerable systems. Future research should focus on streams from a single major watershed to remove geographic location as a driver of variation so the importance of the other watershed factors on CSS parameters could be more effectively teased out, and then integrate these results into an analysis with well-studied biotic factors so that the level of explanatory power for each can be better understood. An ideal future goal for using CSS in stream community management would then be to develop a predictive model that can output estimated future CSS parameters (slope, elevation, and FCL) once biotic factors, geomorphology, and proposed land cover/water quality remediation effects are put into the model. This would give managers the capability to set targets for holistically improving community structure before breaking ground on any restoration/management projects along with thresholds for how much development can be done to a watershed before the stream community structure is significantly harmed.
590 $a School code: 0256.
650 4 $a Software. $2 gtt. $3 619355
650 4 $a Hydrology. $3 545716
650 4 $a Biomass. $3 1013462
650 4 $a Energy. $3 876794
650 4 $a Aquatic ecosystems. $3 3560371
650 4 $a Ecologists. $3 1536112
650 4 $a Backpacks. $3 3762866
650 4 $a Climate change. $2 bicssc $3 2079509
650 4 $a Agricultural pollution. $3 675427
650 4 $a Ships. $3 524059
650 4 $a Creeks & streams. $3 3685269
650 4 $a Lakes. $3 546147
650 4 $a Geomorphology. $3 542703
650 4 $a Watersheds. $3 544815
650 4 $a Decision making. $3 517204
650 4 $a River ecology. $3 3685237
650 4 $a Watershed management. $3 578175
650 4 $a Food chains. $3 3680771
650 4 $a Acid mine drainage. $3 2148497
650 4 $a Fish. $3 3564374
650 4 $a Aquatic sciences. $3 3174300
650 4 $a Biological oceanography. $3 2122748
650 4 $a Ecology. $3 516476
650 4 $a Hydrologic sciences. $3 3168407
650 4 $a Water resources management. $3 794747
690 $a 0791
690 $a 0404
690 $a 0484
690 $a 0792
690 $a 0416
690 $a 0329
690 $a 0388
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0595
710 2 $a West Virginia University. $3 1017532
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 85-06.
790 $a 0256
791 $a M.Sc.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30726002