東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

National Interest in International Relations: Domestic Distributional Consequences and Constraints to Conflict.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	National Interest in International Relations: Domestic Distributional Consequences and Constraints to Conflict./
作者:	Lee, Soyoung.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
面頁冊數:	272 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-04, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-04A.
標題:	Disputes. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30614645
ISBN:	9798380481663

National Interest in International Relations: Domestic Distributional Consequences and Constraints to Conflict.
Lee, Soyoung.

National Interest in International Relations: Domestic Distributional Consequences and Constraints to Conflict. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 272 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-04, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Stanford University, 2023.

Issue value, commonly known as the "\uD835\uDC63−term," plays a central role in many international theories. The value of an issue influences whether states choose to escalate conflict, which states prevail in war, and whether leaders are rewarded for escalating conflict or punished for backing down. Yet we know surprisingly little about why issues take on the value that they do in the first place. In fact, states have often displayed puzzling behaviors when it comes to issue value-they commonly fight over barren lands and uninhabitable islands while not fighting over other issue areas or lands with more evident benefits. So what becomes understood by states and their citizens as important national interests worth fighting for and why? Why do these perceptions of national interest often fail to reflect an issue's objective material value?I argue that domestic distributional consequences play an important role in determining what becomes understood as important national interests worth fighting for. Issues without clear economic value, such as barren lands, are more likely to be perceived as national interests because they do not benefit any single domestic group. Since who benefits is unclear, politicians have an easier time framing such issues as benefiting the whole nation. In contrast, issues with specific economic benefits are more likely to be seen as helping select domestic groups, which makes it harder for leaders to persuasively frame them as representing broad national interests. I support my argument using three original survey experiments (Chapter 3), newly geocoded data of territorial claims spanning 172 years (Chapter 4), qualitative case studies (Chapter 5), and text analysis of political rhetoric (Chapter 6).

ISBN: 9798380481663Subjects--Topical Terms:

3707223
Disputes.

National Interest in International Relations: Domestic Distributional Consequences and Constraints to Conflict.
LDR:02789nmm a2200313 4500 001 2365943
005 20240918072811.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 241017s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798380481663
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30614645
035 $a (MiAaPQ)STANFORDyx621dz3419
035 $a AAI30614645
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Lee, Soyoung. $3 1947984
245 1 0 $a National Interest in International Relations: Domestic Distributional Consequences and Constraints to Conflict.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 272 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-04, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Schultz, Kenneth;Tomz, Michael.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Stanford University, 2023.
520 $a Issue value, commonly known as the "\uD835\uDC63−term," plays a central role in many international theories. The value of an issue influences whether states choose to escalate conflict, which states prevail in war, and whether leaders are rewarded for escalating conflict or punished for backing down. Yet we know surprisingly little about why issues take on the value that they do in the first place. In fact, states have often displayed puzzling behaviors when it comes to issue value-they commonly fight over barren lands and uninhabitable islands while not fighting over other issue areas or lands with more evident benefits. So what becomes understood by states and their citizens as important national interests worth fighting for and why? Why do these perceptions of national interest often fail to reflect an issue's objective material value?I argue that domestic distributional consequences play an important role in determining what becomes understood as important national interests worth fighting for. Issues without clear economic value, such as barren lands, are more likely to be perceived as national interests because they do not benefit any single domestic group. Since who benefits is unclear, politicians have an easier time framing such issues as benefiting the whole nation. In contrast, issues with specific economic benefits are more likely to be seen as helping select domestic groups, which makes it harder for leaders to persuasively frame them as representing broad national interests. I support my argument using three original survey experiments (Chapter 3), newly geocoded data of territorial claims spanning 172 years (Chapter 4), qualitative case studies (Chapter 5), and text analysis of political rhetoric (Chapter 6).
590 $a School code: 0212.
650 4 $a Disputes. $3 3707223
650 4 $a Text analysis. $3 3561686
650 4 $a Territorial issues. $3 3563439
690 $a 0601
710 2 $a Stanford University. $3 754827
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-04A.
790 $a 0212
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30614645