東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Whatever Works : = A Comparative Analysis of Attitudes to Recidivism-Oriented Practices and Programs in Uruguay and the United States = Lo que sea que funcione : un analisis comparativo de las actitudes hacia las practicas y programas orientados a la reincidencia en Uruguay y Estados Unidos.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Whatever Works :/
Reminder of title:	A Comparative Analysis of Attitudes to Recidivism-Oriented Practices and Programs in Uruguay and the United States = Lo que sea que funcione : un analisis comparativo de las actitudes hacia las practicas y programas orientados a la reincidencia en Uruguay y Estados Unidos.
remainder title:	Lo que sea que funcione :
Author:	Oroz, Ruben Dario.
Description:	1 online resource (157 pages)
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-08.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International84-08.
Subject:	Criminology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29991999click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798368462516

Whatever Works : = A Comparative Analysis of Attitudes to Recidivism-Oriented Practices and Programs in Uruguay and the United States = Lo que sea que funcione : un analisis comparativo de las actitudes hacia las practicas y programas orientados a la reincidencia en Uruguay y Estados Unidos.
Oroz, Ruben Dario.

Whatever Works :A Comparative Analysis of Attitudes to Recidivism-Oriented Practices and Programs in Uruguay and the United States = Lo que sea que funcione : un analisis comparativo de las actitudes hacia las practicas y programas orientados a la reincidencia en Uruguay y Estados Unidos.Lo que sea que funcione :un analisis comparativo de las actitudes hacia las practicas y programas orientados a la reincidencia en Uruguay y Estados Unidos. - 1 online resource (157 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-08.

Thesis (M.S.)--The University of Alabama, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

The challenge of mass incarceration is experienced on a global scale. Both the United States and Uruguay follow this trend. The rehabilitation systems of both countries face two major problems: high incarceration rates and high recidivism rates.To make analyses and comparisons of both rehabilitation systems possible, this study reviews literature exposing the history of the prison systems of both countries, the current state of the Uruguayan system, and an exploration of the most used rehabilitation tools in both nations.This study proposes solutions to both high incarceration rates and high recidivism rates, through a qualitative analysis of experts' discourse: parole officers from the United States, and clinical professionals from Uruguay.The results show that, despite major differences between the two study populations sampled, there are agreements in relation to the necessary changes that both systems must undergo in order to achieve more effective interventions in terms of rehabilitation. There seem to be overarching similarities regarding what works and what doesn't work in rehabilitation.This research has generated knowledge in Comparative Criminology, producing new understanding for that area of expertise within Criminology. The information obtained through this study can be used for the benefit of both the American and the Uruguayan rehabilitation systems.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798368462516Subjects--Topical Terms:

533274
Criminology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Comparative criminologyIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Whatever Works : = A Comparative Analysis of Attitudes to Recidivism-Oriented Practices and Programs in Uruguay and the United States = Lo que sea que funcione : un analisis comparativo de las actitudes hacia las practicas y programas orientados a la reincidencia en Uruguay y Estados Unidos.
LDR:04729nmm a2200433K 4500 001 2362187
005 20231027103331.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798368462516
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29991999
035 $a AAI29991999
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Oroz, Ruben Dario. $3 3702906
245 1 0 $a Whatever Works : $b A Comparative Analysis of Attitudes to Recidivism-Oriented Practices and Programs in Uruguay and the United States = Lo que sea que funcione : un analisis comparativo de las actitudes hacia las practicas y programas orientados a la reincidencia en Uruguay y Estados Unidos.
246 3 1 $a Lo que sea que funcione : $b un analisis comparativo de las actitudes hacia las practicas y programas orientados a la reincidencia en Uruguay y Estados Unidos.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (157 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-08.
500 $a Advisor: Dewey, Susan C.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--The University of Alabama, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The challenge of mass incarceration is experienced on a global scale. Both the United States and Uruguay follow this trend. The rehabilitation systems of both countries face two major problems: high incarceration rates and high recidivism rates.To make analyses and comparisons of both rehabilitation systems possible, this study reviews literature exposing the history of the prison systems of both countries, the current state of the Uruguayan system, and an exploration of the most used rehabilitation tools in both nations.This study proposes solutions to both high incarceration rates and high recidivism rates, through a qualitative analysis of experts' discourse: parole officers from the United States, and clinical professionals from Uruguay.The results show that, despite major differences between the two study populations sampled, there are agreements in relation to the necessary changes that both systems must undergo in order to achieve more effective interventions in terms of rehabilitation. There seem to be overarching similarities regarding what works and what doesn't work in rehabilitation.This research has generated knowledge in Comparative Criminology, producing new understanding for that area of expertise within Criminology. The information obtained through this study can be used for the benefit of both the American and the Uruguayan rehabilitation systems.
520 $a El desafio del encarcelamiento masivo se vive a escala mundial. Tanto Estados Unidos como Uruguay siguen esta tendencia. Los sistemas de rehabilitacion de ambos paises enfrentan dos grandes problemas: altas tasas de encarcelamiento y altas tasas de reincidencia.Para hacer posible el analisis y la comparacion de ambos sistemas de rehabilitacion, este estudio revisa literatura que expone la historia de los sistemas penitenciarios de ambos paises, el estado actual del sistema uruguayo y una exploracion de las herramientas de rehabilitacion mas utilizadas en ambas naciones.Este estudio propone soluciones tanto a las altas tasas de encarcelamiento como a las altas tasas de reincidencia, a traves de un analisis cualitativo del discurso de expertos: oficiales de libertad condicional de los Estados Unidos y profesionales clinicos de Uruguay.Los resultados muestran que, a pesar de las grandes diferencias entre las dos poblaciones de estudio muestreadas, existen coincidencias en relacion a los cambios necesarios que deben sufrir ambos sistemas para lograr intervenciones mas efectivas en terminos de rehabilitacion. Parece haber similitudes generales con respecto a lo que funciona y lo que no funciona en la rehabilitacion.Esta investigacion ha generado conocimiento en Criminologia Comparativa, produciendo una nueva comprension para esa area de especializacion dentro de la Criminologia. La informacion obtenida a traves de este estudio puede ser utilizada en beneficio de los sistemas de rehabilitacion estadounidense y uruguayo.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Criminology. $3 533274
650 4 $a Law enforcement. $3 607408
650 4 $a International law. $3 560784
653 $a Comparative criminology
653 $a Criminal justice
653 $a Criminology
653 $a Qualitative research
653 $a Rehabilitation
653 $a Thematic content analysis
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0627
690 $a 0206
690 $a 0616
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a The University of Alabama. $b Criminal Justice. $3 2096558
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 84-08.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29991999 $z click for full text (PQDT)