東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Toward the Microfoundations of Interorganizational Coordination : = The Experience of Artifacts as a Coordination Mechanism Amid Pervasive Conflict.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Toward the Microfoundations of Interorganizational Coordination :/
Reminder of title:	The Experience of Artifacts as a Coordination Mechanism Amid Pervasive Conflict.
Author:	McBride, S. Mercedes.
Description:	1 online resource (203 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-04B.
Subject:	Aesthetics. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29712076click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798845449863

Toward the Microfoundations of Interorganizational Coordination : = The Experience of Artifacts as a Coordination Mechanism Amid Pervasive Conflict.
McBride, S. Mercedes.

Toward the Microfoundations of Interorganizational Coordination :The Experience of Artifacts as a Coordination Mechanism Amid Pervasive Conflict. - 1 online resource (203 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Case Western Reserve University, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

Interorganizational project structures, typified in the construction industry, are highly equivocal and interdependent contexts that require coordination amid pervasive conflict. Although organizations are typically considered the unit of analysis in interorganizational coordination, it is the individual organizational representatives who are responsible for the `on the ground? coordinative efforts. In a two-year-long ethnography of an interorganizational construction project, I explored how individual organizational representatives used artifacts and their associated sensate experience to manage conflict and resolve felt tension in order to coordinate. The theorized process model I developed shows how the most productive interactions among organizational representatives involved creating an artifactual experience, comprising interaction with an artifact that evoked a meaningful aesthetic experience. In project team meetings, organizational representatives would use artifacts such as building plans, models, and prototypes to create an artifactual interaction comprising four interactive dimensions of revealing, engaging with, commentating on, and proximally positioning to the artifact. In so doing, the bodily senses of the organizational representatives were engaged in an aesthetic experience. Through the synchrony in attention and shared aesthetic experience, project team members experienced increases in collective energy that cut through the felt tension that would emerge in team meetings. Rather than resolving interorganizational conflicts, the collective energy helped project team members to co-construct a salient line of discourse for the team, which took the form of a decision or provisional agreement that became the next concrete step in a path forward. My findings on experience-as-coordination-mechanism suggest that embodied forms of knowledge such as felt tension, aesthetic experience, and collective energy are important for understanding interorganizational?and not just interpersonal or intrateam?coordination. The elements of the artifactual experience highlight how participants enact objects and materials as coordination mechanisms in interorganizational contexts, complementing accounts of boundary objects in interprofessional environments. These insights bear implications for coordinating teamwork in a range of boundary-spanning environments.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798845449863Subjects--Topical Terms:

523036
Aesthetics.
Subjects--Index Terms:

CoordinationIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Toward the Microfoundations of Interorganizational Coordination : = The Experience of Artifacts as a Coordination Mechanism Amid Pervasive Conflict.
LDR:03827nmm a2200385K 4500 001 2358349
005 20230731112625.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798845449863
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29712076
035 $a AAI29712076
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a McBride, S. Mercedes. $3 3698885
245 1 0 $a Toward the Microfoundations of Interorganizational Coordination : $b The Experience of Artifacts as a Coordination Mechanism Amid Pervasive Conflict.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (203 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04, Section: B.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Case Western Reserve University, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Interorganizational project structures, typified in the construction industry, are highly equivocal and interdependent contexts that require coordination amid pervasive conflict. Although organizations are typically considered the unit of analysis in interorganizational coordination, it is the individual organizational representatives who are responsible for the `on the ground? coordinative efforts. In a two-year-long ethnography of an interorganizational construction project, I explored how individual organizational representatives used artifacts and their associated sensate experience to manage conflict and resolve felt tension in order to coordinate. The theorized process model I developed shows how the most productive interactions among organizational representatives involved creating an artifactual experience, comprising interaction with an artifact that evoked a meaningful aesthetic experience. In project team meetings, organizational representatives would use artifacts such as building plans, models, and prototypes to create an artifactual interaction comprising four interactive dimensions of revealing, engaging with, commentating on, and proximally positioning to the artifact. In so doing, the bodily senses of the organizational representatives were engaged in an aesthetic experience. Through the synchrony in attention and shared aesthetic experience, project team members experienced increases in collective energy that cut through the felt tension that would emerge in team meetings. Rather than resolving interorganizational conflicts, the collective energy helped project team members to co-construct a salient line of discourse for the team, which took the form of a decision or provisional agreement that became the next concrete step in a path forward. My findings on experience-as-coordination-mechanism suggest that embodied forms of knowledge such as felt tension, aesthetic experience, and collective energy are important for understanding interorganizational?and not just interpersonal or intrateam?coordination. The elements of the artifactual experience highlight how participants enact objects and materials as coordination mechanisms in interorganizational contexts, complementing accounts of boundary objects in interprofessional environments. These insights bear implications for coordinating teamwork in a range of boundary-spanning environments.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Aesthetics. $3 523036
650 4 $a Behavioral sciences. $3 529833
653 $a Coordination
653 $a Interorganizational coordination
653 $a Coordination mechanisms
653 $a Artifacts
653 $a Aesthetic experience
653 $a Tension
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0602
690 $a 0650
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Case Western Reserve University. $b Organizational Behavior. $3 3560652
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-04B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29712076 $z click for full text (PQDT)