東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Use of Co-constructions in Russian TV and Radio Political Interviews (on the Example of Vladimir Pozner and Alexey Venediktov).

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Use of Co-constructions in Russian TV and Radio Political Interviews (on the Example of Vladimir Pozner and Alexey Venediktov)./
作者:	Fomchenko, Anna.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	68 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International83-03.
標題:	Linguistics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28719885
ISBN:	9798544246107

The Use of Co-constructions in Russian TV and Radio Political Interviews (on the Example of Vladimir Pozner and Alexey Venediktov).
Fomchenko, Anna.

The Use of Co-constructions in Russian TV and Radio Political Interviews (on the Example of Vladimir Pozner and Alexey Venediktov). - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 68 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03.

Thesis (M.A.)--The University of Arizona, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The present study investigates the use of co-constructions (or sentences-in-progress) in Russian TV and radio political interviews. The author analyzed ten political interviews conducted by Russian journalists Vladimir Pozner (TV interviews) and Alexey Venediktov (radio interviews). The analysis demonstrated the following results. Co-constructions in political interviews serve several distinct purposes. They are used (1) to obtain necessary information, (2) to correct facts provided by interviewees, (3) to ask questions, (4) to establish contact with interviewees and maintain it during the interview, (5) to express agreement and affiliation, (6) to express disagreement and negative assessment, (7) to supply a forgotten word or string of words. The use of co-constructions is influenced by personalities of conversational participants. The results of the analysis showed that the frequency of occurrence of co-constructions on TV and radio interviews is the same. The study follows the analytical framework based on conversation analysis.

ISBN: 9798544246107Subjects--Topical Terms:

524476
Linguistics.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Turn-constructional unit

The Use of Co-constructions in Russian TV and Radio Political Interviews (on the Example of Vladimir Pozner and Alexey Venediktov).
LDR:02303nmm a2200385 4500 001 2352508
005 20221128104003.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798544246107
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28719885
035 $a AAI28719885
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Fomchenko, Anna. $3 3692144
245 1 4 $a The Use of Co-constructions in Russian TV and Radio Political Interviews (on the Example of Vladimir Pozner and Alexey Venediktov).
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 68 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03.
500 $a Advisor: Klimanova, Liudmila.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--The University of Arizona, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The present study investigates the use of co-constructions (or sentences-in-progress) in Russian TV and radio political interviews. The author analyzed ten political interviews conducted by Russian journalists Vladimir Pozner (TV interviews) and Alexey Venediktov (radio interviews). The analysis demonstrated the following results. Co-constructions in political interviews serve several distinct purposes. They are used (1) to obtain necessary information, (2) to correct facts provided by interviewees, (3) to ask questions, (4) to establish contact with interviewees and maintain it during the interview, (5) to express agreement and affiliation, (6) to express disagreement and negative assessment, (7) to supply a forgotten word or string of words. The use of co-constructions is influenced by personalities of conversational participants. The results of the analysis showed that the frequency of occurrence of co-constructions on TV and radio interviews is the same. The study follows the analytical framework based on conversation analysis.
590 $a School code: 0009.
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
650 4 $a Language. $3 643551
650 4 $a Journalism. $3 576107
650 4 $a Genre. $3 2191767
650 4 $a Journalists. $3 795158
650 4 $a Phenomenology. $3 533816
650 4 $a Collaboration. $3 3556296
650 4 $a Syntax. $3 897045
650 4 $a Social interaction. $3 520415
650 4 $a Success. $3 518195
650 4 $a Audiences. $3 618475
650 4 $a Hypotheses. $3 3560118
650 4 $a Verbal communication. $3 3560678
650 4 $a Ethnomethodology. $3 573042
650 4 $a Politics. $3 685427
650 4 $a Speaking. $3 3561999
650 4 $a Influence. $3 1973172
650 4 $a Speech. $3 530580
650 4 $a Interviews. $3 856777
650 4 $a Semantics. $3 520060
653 $a Turn-constructional unit
653 $a Co-construction
653 $a Compound turn-constructional unit
653 $a Conversation analysis
653 $a Joint construction
653 $a Turn-taking
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0679
690 $a 0391
710 2 $a The University of Arizona. $b Russian. $3 2100740
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 83-03.
790 $a 0009
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28719885