東華大學圖書館 |

Winery Cleaning and Sanitization: Optimized Chemistries for Managing Fermentation Soils and the Sulfur Dioxide Fumigation of Winery Cooperage.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Winery Cleaning and Sanitization: Optimized Chemistries for Managing Fermentation Soils and the Sulfur Dioxide Fumigation of Winery Cooperage./
作者:	Marx, Cory J.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	150 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-03B.
標題:	Food science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28321300
ISBN:	9798535597331

Winery Cleaning and Sanitization: Optimized Chemistries for Managing Fermentation Soils and the Sulfur Dioxide Fumigation of Winery Cooperage.
Marx, Cory J.

Winery Cleaning and Sanitization: Optimized Chemistries for Managing Fermentation Soils and the Sulfur Dioxide Fumigation of Winery Cooperage. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 150 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Davis, 2021.

This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

Cleaning and sanitization are essential operations in wine production. The use of chemical cleaning and sanitizing agents for managing waste in fermentation vessels and the sulfur dioxide fumigation of empty oak barrels are ubiquitous processes in commercial wineries but are poorly studied in academic literature. Increasing environmental pressures and concerns over the poor quality of winery wastewater have created a need for optimizing protocols by reducing chemical inputs and water usage while maximizing the efficacy of treatments and employee safety during application. To optimize the use of chemical cleaning and sanitizing agents for managing fermentor waste the performance of a wide range of commercially available cleaning and sanitizing chemistries was assessed using fermentation derived soils and spoilage microorganisms in planktonic and sessile physiologies in trials from bench scale to 2000-L fermentation tanks. Minimum effective antimicrobial concentrations of chemical treatments were determined for common winery spoilage yeasts using the minimum inhibitory concentration, minimum biocidal concentration assay, and a modified minimum biofilm inactivation assay. Propidium iodide fluorescent staining was used to determine the minimum effective contact time required for inactivating Saccharomyces cerevisiae cultures using peracetic acid. Results suggested that caustic cleaning agents were the most effective in removing fermentation soils, and that sanitizers were ineffective without thorough prior cleaning. Peracetic acid- and hydrogen peroxide-based sanitizer formulations were effective and have innocuous breakdown products compared to traditional chemistries. Manufacturers' suggested application rates were largely in line with the minimum effective antimicrobial concentration for the spoilage microorganisms tested. In practical settings, sanitary tank design may be the most important factor in determining the success of cleaning and sanitizing efforts regardless of the specific chemicals applied.The sulfur dioxide detection performance of colorimetric gas detection tubes, gas chromatography-sulfur chemiluminescence detection, and a novel electrochemical sensor apparatus was assessed. The electrochemical sensor was superior in linearity and precision versus the other detectors. American oak barrels were used to measure the persistence and antimicrobial efficacy of the sulfur dioxide fumigation of empty winery cooperage for pure gas application and the combustion of solid sulfur wicks. Prior to fumigation, the penetration rate and abundance of spoilage yeasts in barrel wood for cultures inoculated in grape must was determined for Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Brettanomyces bruxellensis cultures. S. cerevisiae cultures were recovered at 10 mm depth within one week of inoculation. B. bruxellensis cultures did not penetrate beyond surface samples within six weeks of inoculation. Measurable concentrations of sulfur dioxide existed after six weeks of storage for pure gas and sulfur stick fumigation, with concentration profiles closely described by power law functions regardless of the hydration status of the barrel wood. Both gas applications and sulfur stick combustion effectively eliminated culturable populations of S. cerevisiae and B. bruxellensis for all samples. Methods for assessing the mechanism of sulfur dioxide diffusion as a Fickian process according to the steady-state approximation poorly fit the measured gas data. Interactions between the diffusing gas and the stave wood and the heterogeneous structure of barrels may explain the discrepancy between the observed and predicted Fickian diffusive behavior. Together, this work presents the most comprehensive quantitative assessment of winery cleaning and sanitization to date in academic literature. These studies not only provide insight into the fundamental interaction of microorganisms, winery equipment, and chemical cleaners and sanitizers, but can also act as a practical resource for winemakers to develop effective cleaning and sanitizing protocols and monitoring strategies.

ISBN: 9798535597331Subjects--Topical Terms:

3173303
Food science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Enology

Winery Cleaning and Sanitization: Optimized Chemistries for Managing Fermentation Soils and the Sulfur Dioxide Fumigation of Winery Cooperage.
LDR:05608nmm a2200469 4500 001 2351691
005 20221111101707.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798535597331
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28321300
035 $a AAI28321300
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Marx, Cory J. $3 3691258
245 1 0 $a Winery Cleaning and Sanitization: Optimized Chemistries for Managing Fermentation Soils and the Sulfur Dioxide Fumigation of Winery Cooperage.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 150 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Oberholster, Anita.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Davis, 2021.
506 $a This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Cleaning and sanitization are essential operations in wine production. The use of chemical cleaning and sanitizing agents for managing waste in fermentation vessels and the sulfur dioxide fumigation of empty oak barrels are ubiquitous processes in commercial wineries but are poorly studied in academic literature. Increasing environmental pressures and concerns over the poor quality of winery wastewater have created a need for optimizing protocols by reducing chemical inputs and water usage while maximizing the efficacy of treatments and employee safety during application. To optimize the use of chemical cleaning and sanitizing agents for managing fermentor waste the performance of a wide range of commercially available cleaning and sanitizing chemistries was assessed using fermentation derived soils and spoilage microorganisms in planktonic and sessile physiologies in trials from bench scale to 2000-L fermentation tanks. Minimum effective antimicrobial concentrations of chemical treatments were determined for common winery spoilage yeasts using the minimum inhibitory concentration, minimum biocidal concentration assay, and a modified minimum biofilm inactivation assay. Propidium iodide fluorescent staining was used to determine the minimum effective contact time required for inactivating Saccharomyces cerevisiae cultures using peracetic acid. Results suggested that caustic cleaning agents were the most effective in removing fermentation soils, and that sanitizers were ineffective without thorough prior cleaning. Peracetic acid- and hydrogen peroxide-based sanitizer formulations were effective and have innocuous breakdown products compared to traditional chemistries. Manufacturers' suggested application rates were largely in line with the minimum effective antimicrobial concentration for the spoilage microorganisms tested. In practical settings, sanitary tank design may be the most important factor in determining the success of cleaning and sanitizing efforts regardless of the specific chemicals applied.The sulfur dioxide detection performance of colorimetric gas detection tubes, gas chromatography-sulfur chemiluminescence detection, and a novel electrochemical sensor apparatus was assessed. The electrochemical sensor was superior in linearity and precision versus the other detectors. American oak barrels were used to measure the persistence and antimicrobial efficacy of the sulfur dioxide fumigation of empty winery cooperage for pure gas application and the combustion of solid sulfur wicks. Prior to fumigation, the penetration rate and abundance of spoilage yeasts in barrel wood for cultures inoculated in grape must was determined for Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Brettanomyces bruxellensis cultures. S. cerevisiae cultures were recovered at 10 mm depth within one week of inoculation. B. bruxellensis cultures did not penetrate beyond surface samples within six weeks of inoculation. Measurable concentrations of sulfur dioxide existed after six weeks of storage for pure gas and sulfur stick fumigation, with concentration profiles closely described by power law functions regardless of the hydration status of the barrel wood. Both gas applications and sulfur stick combustion effectively eliminated culturable populations of S. cerevisiae and B. bruxellensis for all samples. Methods for assessing the mechanism of sulfur dioxide diffusion as a Fickian process according to the steady-state approximation poorly fit the measured gas data. Interactions between the diffusing gas and the stave wood and the heterogeneous structure of barrels may explain the discrepancy between the observed and predicted Fickian diffusive behavior. Together, this work presents the most comprehensive quantitative assessment of winery cleaning and sanitization to date in academic literature. These studies not only provide insight into the fundamental interaction of microorganisms, winery equipment, and chemical cleaners and sanitizers, but can also act as a practical resource for winemakers to develop effective cleaning and sanitizing protocols and monitoring strategies.
590 $a School code: 0029.
650 4 $a Food science. $3 3173303
650 4 $a Aging. $3 543123
650 4 $a Agronomy. $3 2122783
650 4 $a Soil sciences. $3 2122699
650 4 $a Agricultural chemistry. $3 523947
653 $a Enology
653 $a Oak Barrels
653 $a Sanitation
653 $a Wine
653 $a Winery cleaning
653 $a Fermentation soils
653 $a Sulfur dioxide fumigation
653 $a Winery cooperage
653 $a Food contamination
690 $a 0359
690 $a 0493
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0749
690 $a 0481
690 $a 0285
710 2 $a University of California, Davis. $b Food Science. $3 3193559
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-03B.
790 $a 0029
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28321300