東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Mirror Therapy and Electrical Stimulation VS. Electrical Stimulation on Hand Function and Dexterity During Subacute Stroke Recovery.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Mirror Therapy and Electrical Stimulation VS. Electrical Stimulation on Hand Function and Dexterity During Subacute Stroke Recovery./
作者:	Esponilla, Sereno.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2022,
面頁冊數:	65 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-10, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-10B.
標題:	Physical therapy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29065581
ISBN:	9798209985839

Mirror Therapy and Electrical Stimulation VS. Electrical Stimulation on Hand Function and Dexterity During Subacute Stroke Recovery.
Esponilla, Sereno.

Mirror Therapy and Electrical Stimulation VS. Electrical Stimulation on Hand Function and Dexterity During Subacute Stroke Recovery. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2022 - 65 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-10, Section: B.

Thesis (D.P.T.)--California State University, Fresno, 2022.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Stroke is a disabling pathology affecting 795,000 individuals per year. Impaired hand functions such as grasping, holding, and object manipulation are persistent post-stroke issues limiting daily function. Restricted post-stroke hand recovery is a clinical problem that is further compounded by limited evidence and effective hand interventions in current clinical practice guidelines. This metaanalysis compares the efficacy of mirror therapy and electrical stimulation to electrical stimulation on hand function and dexterity in subacute stroke recovery. Articles were collected using Google Scholar, Elsevier, EBSCO host and PubMed and the methodological quality was assessed using the PEDRo scale. The mean difference and post-test standard deviation of the Fugl- Meyer Hand subsection and Box and Block test were extracted from the included articles. Meta Essentials software was used to calculate the desired effect sizes under a 95% confidence interval. The five articles that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this meta-analysis were of good quality. A lack of statistical significance was observed in the Fugl- Meyer Hand subsection at 0.45 and the Box and Block test at 0.35. Mirror therapy with electrical stimulation is a promising intervention that may be more effective in restoring hand function and dexterity. However, a lack of statistical significance complicates the ability to apply this intervention to subacute stroke patients. Thus, further high-quality research is warranted on this topic.

ISBN: 9798209985839Subjects--Topical Terms:

588713
Physical therapy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Electrical Stimulation

Mirror Therapy and Electrical Stimulation VS. Electrical Stimulation on Hand Function and Dexterity During Subacute Stroke Recovery.
LDR:02698nmm a2200349 4500 001 2350882
005 20221028161040.5
008 241004s2022 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798209985839
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29065581
035 $a AAI29065581
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Esponilla, Sereno. $3 3690410
245 1 0 $a Mirror Therapy and Electrical Stimulation VS. Electrical Stimulation on Hand Function and Dexterity During Subacute Stroke Recovery.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2022
300 $a 65 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-10, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Hajela, Nupur.
502 $a Thesis (D.P.T.)--California State University, Fresno, 2022.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Stroke is a disabling pathology affecting 795,000 individuals per year. Impaired hand functions such as grasping, holding, and object manipulation are persistent post-stroke issues limiting daily function. Restricted post-stroke hand recovery is a clinical problem that is further compounded by limited evidence and effective hand interventions in current clinical practice guidelines. This metaanalysis compares the efficacy of mirror therapy and electrical stimulation to electrical stimulation on hand function and dexterity in subacute stroke recovery. Articles were collected using Google Scholar, Elsevier, EBSCO host and PubMed and the methodological quality was assessed using the PEDRo scale. The mean difference and post-test standard deviation of the Fugl- Meyer Hand subsection and Box and Block test were extracted from the included articles. Meta Essentials software was used to calculate the desired effect sizes under a 95% confidence interval. The five articles that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this meta-analysis were of good quality. A lack of statistical significance was observed in the Fugl- Meyer Hand subsection at 0.45 and the Box and Block test at 0.35. Mirror therapy with electrical stimulation is a promising intervention that may be more effective in restoring hand function and dexterity. However, a lack of statistical significance complicates the ability to apply this intervention to subacute stroke patients. Thus, further high-quality research is warranted on this topic.
590 $a School code: 6050.
650 4 $a Physical therapy. $3 588713
653 $a Electrical Stimulation
653 $a Mirror therapy
653 $a Physical therapy
653 $a Subacute
653 $a Stroke
690 $a 0382
710 2 $a California State University, Fresno. $b Physical Therapy. $3 3286130
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-10B.
790 $a 6050
791 $a D.P.T.
792 $a 2022
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29065581