語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
到查詢結果
[ null ]
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
A Grounded Theory Study of Interprofessional Teamworking in the Operating Room: What Makes a "Great Day" at Work?
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
A Grounded Theory Study of Interprofessional Teamworking in the Operating Room: What Makes a "Great Day" at Work?/
作者:
Scott, Margaret.
出版者:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:
389 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-06, Section: B.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International83-06B.
標題:
Patient safety. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28846676
ISBN:
9798759925644
A Grounded Theory Study of Interprofessional Teamworking in the Operating Room: What Makes a "Great Day" at Work?
Scott, Margaret.
A Grounded Theory Study of Interprofessional Teamworking in the Operating Room: What Makes a "Great Day" at Work?
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 389 p.
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-06, Section: B.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Northumbria at Newcastle (United Kingdom), 2021.
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
Background:The operating room (OR) environment is a unique context within the clinical setting, which brings together interprofessional healthcare providers in a confined space where patient care is directed at a concentrated focal point. The notion that a team of experts do not simply merge to form an expert team is reflected through reported failures in teamwork in the OR. Interactions between and among interprofessional healthcare providers within the OR context are critical in optimising the way in which the team works together. There is limited empirical research exploring teamwork in the OR through the perceptions of interprofessional healthcare providers who have experience of teamworking in this unique context.Aim:The aim of the research was to address the gap in knowledge and develop a more comprehensive understanding of teamwork in the OR. Specifically, the research aimed to explore interprofessional teamwork in the OR exclusively, through the perceptions of individuals who had personal experiences of working in such teams.Methodology and Methods: This research was guided by Strauss and Corbin's (1990) approach to grounded theory, influenced by the theoretical perspective of symbolic interactionism. The sample population comprised of a group of individuals in an established interprofessional role, who could contribute to understanding 'teamwork as imagined' and 'teamwork as done' within the OR. Using a theoretical sampling strategy, data were collected via 14 in-depth semi-structured interviews, three observation periods and informal interviews, with accompanying detailed field notes. Data were analysed using open, axial and selective coding techniques, supported by constant comparative analysis until theoretical saturation was achieved.Findings:The analysis generated four data categories. Antecedents of Familiarity is the core category that helps to describe the social processes of interactions of interprofessional healthcare providers during OR encounters. The three sub-categories, Shared Understanding, Positive Disposition and Professional Communication, provide further explanation of the micro, meso and macro contexts that facilitate and/or impede interactions during teamwork. To reflect participant perceptions of the complex nature of teamwork in the OR, a grounded theory was constructed and integrated into The Interprofessional Collective Effort (ICE) Model of OR teamwork and the underpinning PerfORm taxonomy. Given the importance of interactions among and between interprofessional healthcare providers in the OR, the new theoretical insight gained from this model provides a more comprehensive understanding to guide educators, leaders/managers and policymakers in planning strategies to support interprofessional teamwork in the OR. Original contributions to the existing knowledge base around OR teamworking are offered, alongside a basis from which to address emerging implications for academic disciplines, research areas, interprofessional education and collaborative team training.
ISBN: 9798759925644Subjects--Topical Terms:
2074800
Patient safety.
A Grounded Theory Study of Interprofessional Teamworking in the Operating Room: What Makes a "Great Day" at Work?
LDR
:04211nmm a2200337 4500
001
2349644
005
20230509091136.5
006
m o d
007
cr#unu||||||||
008
241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9798759925644
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI28846676
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)Northumbria_47372
035
$a
AAI28846676
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Scott, Margaret.
$3
3689058
245
1 0
$a
A Grounded Theory Study of Interprofessional Teamworking in the Operating Room: What Makes a "Great Day" at Work?
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2021
300
$a
389 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-06, Section: B.
500
$a
Advisor: Machin, Alison;Fisher, Melanie.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Northumbria at Newcastle (United Kingdom), 2021.
506
$a
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520
$a
Background:The operating room (OR) environment is a unique context within the clinical setting, which brings together interprofessional healthcare providers in a confined space where patient care is directed at a concentrated focal point. The notion that a team of experts do not simply merge to form an expert team is reflected through reported failures in teamwork in the OR. Interactions between and among interprofessional healthcare providers within the OR context are critical in optimising the way in which the team works together. There is limited empirical research exploring teamwork in the OR through the perceptions of interprofessional healthcare providers who have experience of teamworking in this unique context.Aim:The aim of the research was to address the gap in knowledge and develop a more comprehensive understanding of teamwork in the OR. Specifically, the research aimed to explore interprofessional teamwork in the OR exclusively, through the perceptions of individuals who had personal experiences of working in such teams.Methodology and Methods: This research was guided by Strauss and Corbin's (1990) approach to grounded theory, influenced by the theoretical perspective of symbolic interactionism. The sample population comprised of a group of individuals in an established interprofessional role, who could contribute to understanding 'teamwork as imagined' and 'teamwork as done' within the OR. Using a theoretical sampling strategy, data were collected via 14 in-depth semi-structured interviews, three observation periods and informal interviews, with accompanying detailed field notes. Data were analysed using open, axial and selective coding techniques, supported by constant comparative analysis until theoretical saturation was achieved.Findings:The analysis generated four data categories. Antecedents of Familiarity is the core category that helps to describe the social processes of interactions of interprofessional healthcare providers during OR encounters. The three sub-categories, Shared Understanding, Positive Disposition and Professional Communication, provide further explanation of the micro, meso and macro contexts that facilitate and/or impede interactions during teamwork. To reflect participant perceptions of the complex nature of teamwork in the OR, a grounded theory was constructed and integrated into The Interprofessional Collective Effort (ICE) Model of OR teamwork and the underpinning PerfORm taxonomy. Given the importance of interactions among and between interprofessional healthcare providers in the OR, the new theoretical insight gained from this model provides a more comprehensive understanding to guide educators, leaders/managers and policymakers in planning strategies to support interprofessional teamwork in the OR. Original contributions to the existing knowledge base around OR teamworking are offered, alongside a basis from which to address emerging implications for academic disciplines, research areas, interprofessional education and collaborative team training.
590
$a
School code: 5060.
650
4
$a
Patient safety.
$3
2074800
650
4
$a
Collaboration.
$3
3556296
650
4
$a
Ontology.
$3
530874
650
4
$a
Health care management.
$3
2122906
650
4
$a
Medical personnel.
$2
itrt.
$3
774747
690
$a
0769
690
$a
0207
710
2
$a
University of Northumbria at Newcastle (United Kingdom).
$3
3545556
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
83-06B.
790
$a
5060
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2021
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28846676
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9472082
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入
(1)帳號:一般為「身分證號」;外籍生或交換生則為「學號」。 (2)密碼:預設為帳號末四碼。
帳號
.
密碼
.
請在此電腦上記得個人資料
取消
忘記密碼? (請注意!您必須已在系統登記E-mail信箱方能使用。)