東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

"The Effects of Carrying Out Collaborative Writing on the Individual Writing Proficiency of English Second Language Learners in an English for Academic Purposes Program".

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	"The Effects of Carrying Out Collaborative Writing on the Individual Writing Proficiency of English Second Language Learners in an English for Academic Purposes Program"./
作者:	Davison, Ian.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	268 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-05, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-05A.
標題:	Explicit knowledge. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28750762
ISBN:	9798494442802

"The Effects of Carrying Out Collaborative Writing on the Individual Writing Proficiency of English Second Language Learners in an English for Academic Purposes Program".
Davison, Ian.

"The Effects of Carrying Out Collaborative Writing on the Individual Writing Proficiency of English Second Language Learners in an English for Academic Purposes Program". - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 268 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-05, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Lancaster University (United Kingdom), 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This quasi-experimental classroom-based study (n=128) looks at what students in an English for Academic Purposes Program (EAP) learn from the process of writing collaboratively and how this affects the individual writing that they subsequently produce. This is compared to how individual writing is affected by carrying out independent writing. Previous research carried out by Storch (2005), Storch and Wigglesworth (2007), Wigglesworth and Storch (2009), Dobao (2012), McDonough, De Vleeschauwer and Crawford (2018) and Villarreal and Gil-Sarratea (2019) found that writing produced collaboratively (by pairs or groups of writers) was more accurate than writing produced independently. This thesis suggests that individual students can learn from the process of writing collaboratively and that their own subsequent individual writing could become more accurate or improve as a result.Analysis of individual pre and post-test writing completed before and after two groups of students had carried out a series of writing tasks either collaboratively (collaborative writing group, n=64) or independently (independent writing group, n=64) over a period of 8 weeks revealed that accuracy increased to a significantly greater degree in the post-test writing of students from the collaborative group than in the same writing of students from the independent writing group. On the other hand, there were similar statistically significant increases in fluency and lexical complexity in the post-test writing of both groups and in the coherence and cohesion of post-test writing although syntactic complexity did not increase significantly in either group. In this study, it seems that carrying out collaborative writing has had a notable impact on the accuracy of the individual writing that learners who engaged in this writing process subsequently produced. Other facets of individual writing developed in a similar way after completing collaborative writing and the independent writing that is commonly carried out in English for Academic Purposes programs.Analysis of collaborative dialogue also revealed that students engaged in language related episodes concerning the use of language in the coauthored text that they produced. This involved peer discussion about how language was used, peer-to-peer corrective feedback and sharing knowledge about language use. The results also indicated that other interactive processes besides language related episodes, such as noticing, could also facilitate possible learningThis study contributes to the field of Second Language Writing and English for Academic Purposes (EAP) because it highlights the learning potential of this interactive writing process and suggests that collaborative writing is a viable learning to write activity for the field of EAP.

ISBN: 9798494442802Subjects--Topical Terms:

3682762
Explicit knowledge.

"The Effects of Carrying Out Collaborative Writing on the Individual Writing Proficiency of English Second Language Learners in an English for Academic Purposes Program".
LDR:04066nmm a2200385 4500 001 2349617
005 20230509091128.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798494442802
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28750762
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Lancaster_157019
035 $a AAI28750762
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Davison, Ian. $3 3689028
245 1 0 $a "The Effects of Carrying Out Collaborative Writing on the Individual Writing Proficiency of English Second Language Learners in an English for Academic Purposes Program".
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 268 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-05, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Philp, Jenefer.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Lancaster University (United Kingdom), 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This quasi-experimental classroom-based study (n=128) looks at what students in an English for Academic Purposes Program (EAP) learn from the process of writing collaboratively and how this affects the individual writing that they subsequently produce. This is compared to how individual writing is affected by carrying out independent writing. Previous research carried out by Storch (2005), Storch and Wigglesworth (2007), Wigglesworth and Storch (2009), Dobao (2012), McDonough, De Vleeschauwer and Crawford (2018) and Villarreal and Gil-Sarratea (2019) found that writing produced collaboratively (by pairs or groups of writers) was more accurate than writing produced independently. This thesis suggests that individual students can learn from the process of writing collaboratively and that their own subsequent individual writing could become more accurate or improve as a result.Analysis of individual pre and post-test writing completed before and after two groups of students had carried out a series of writing tasks either collaboratively (collaborative writing group, n=64) or independently (independent writing group, n=64) over a period of 8 weeks revealed that accuracy increased to a significantly greater degree in the post-test writing of students from the collaborative group than in the same writing of students from the independent writing group. On the other hand, there were similar statistically significant increases in fluency and lexical complexity in the post-test writing of both groups and in the coherence and cohesion of post-test writing although syntactic complexity did not increase significantly in either group. In this study, it seems that carrying out collaborative writing has had a notable impact on the accuracy of the individual writing that learners who engaged in this writing process subsequently produced. Other facets of individual writing developed in a similar way after completing collaborative writing and the independent writing that is commonly carried out in English for Academic Purposes programs.Analysis of collaborative dialogue also revealed that students engaged in language related episodes concerning the use of language in the coauthored text that they produced. This involved peer discussion about how language was used, peer-to-peer corrective feedback and sharing knowledge about language use. The results also indicated that other interactive processes besides language related episodes, such as noticing, could also facilitate possible learningThis study contributes to the field of Second Language Writing and English for Academic Purposes (EAP) because it highlights the learning potential of this interactive writing process and suggests that collaborative writing is a viable learning to write activity for the field of EAP.
590 $a School code: 0416.
650 4 $a Explicit knowledge. $3 3682762
650 4 $a Language acquisition. $3 528343
650 4 $a Collaboration. $3 3556296
650 4 $a Second language learning. $3 3542620
650 4 $a Declaration of Independence-US. $3 3689029
650 4 $a American history. $3 2122692
650 4 $a Bilingual education. $3 2122778
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
650 4 $a Education history. $3 3171959
650 4 $a History. $3 516518
650 4 $a Language. $3 643551
690 $a 0337
690 $a 0282
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0520
690 $a 0578
690 $a 0679
710 2 $a Lancaster University (United Kingdom). $3 1294170
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-05A.
790 $a 0416
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28750762