語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
到查詢結果
[ null ]
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Impacts of Experiential Learning on the Affective Domain: Gaining Insight into How to Broaden Participation in the Geosciences.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Impacts of Experiential Learning on the Affective Domain: Gaining Insight into How to Broaden Participation in the Geosciences./
作者:
Cook, Meghan Lindsey.
出版者:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:
141 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-11, Section: B.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International82-11B.
標題:
Pedagogy. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28410674
ISBN:
9798728227342
Impacts of Experiential Learning on the Affective Domain: Gaining Insight into How to Broaden Participation in the Geosciences.
Cook, Meghan Lindsey.
Impacts of Experiential Learning on the Affective Domain: Gaining Insight into How to Broaden Participation in the Geosciences.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 141 p.
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-11, Section: B.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of South Florida, 2021.
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
Experiential learning exercises, such as field trips, are a common pedagogical practice in geoscience curriculums. Their purpose is to facilitate the transfer of knowledge gained in a classroom or lab setting into a field setting, but can be considered a barrier for entry into the geosciences for those with disabilities, caregiver/employment responsibilities, or financial constraints. Educators have begun turned to other modalities, such as virtual field experiences (VFEs), to create a more inclusive environment in the geosciences. However, the validity of VFEs as a replacement for, or augmentation to traditional field trips has yet to be established. The cognitive domain (e.g., knowledge, understanding, and comprehension) impacts of both traditional and virtual field trips on students have been studied extensively (Butler, 2008; Drummond & Markin, 2008; Hurst, 1998; Markowitz et al., 2018; Mead et al., 2019; Mogk & Goodwin, 2012; Whitmeyer et al., 2009), but the impacts to the affective domain (e.g., motivations, emotions, and perceptions) are comparatively sparse. To fully understand the implications of field trips on students, and to gain insight on how to broaden participation into the geosciences, the impacts of both traditional and virtual field trips on the affective domain need to be studied.In my study, I sought to understand the affective domain implications of a traditional field trip setting as well as a virtual field trip setting by qualitative methods. I used semi-structured interviews along with photographs to gain insight of the affective domain impacts from traditional field trips, and semi-structured interviews only for the virtual field trip. Results from the traditional field trip study indicate students need to be involved in a community of practice to elicit positive affective domain impacts. Negative affective domain impacts derive from multiple sources such as uncertainty of field trip logistics, lack of accommodations from the instructor in regards to required physical activities, and a student's lack of preparedness for a day out in the field. Results from the virtual field trip study indicate an overall positive affective domain impact, as every participant stated the experience exceeded their expectations of technological capabilities, user-ability, and interaction with the virtual environment. Participants remarked on the experience as being similar to traditional field trips, which enhanced immersion, and appreciated the iVFT as an option in lieu of a traditional field trip.The results of my study indicate the affective domain can be dominant in both a traditional and virtual field trip setting meaning educators need to account for a student's feelings, emotions, and perceptions when creating field trip experiences. Larger implications apply to broadening participation into the geosciences as the validity of VFEs as an option for those unable to attend a traditional field trip is becoming increasingly accepted.
ISBN: 9798728227342Subjects--Topical Terms:
2122828
Pedagogy.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Diversity
Impacts of Experiential Learning on the Affective Domain: Gaining Insight into How to Broaden Participation in the Geosciences.
LDR
:04401nmm a2200457 4500
001
2346382
005
20230315102155.5
006
m o d
007
cr#unu||||||||
008
241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9798728227342
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI28410674
035
$a
AAI28410674
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Cook, Meghan Lindsey.
$3
3685466
245
1 0
$a
Impacts of Experiential Learning on the Affective Domain: Gaining Insight into How to Broaden Participation in the Geosciences.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2021
300
$a
141 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-11, Section: B.
500
$a
Advisor: Ryan, Jeffrey G.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of South Florida, 2021.
506
$a
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520
$a
Experiential learning exercises, such as field trips, are a common pedagogical practice in geoscience curriculums. Their purpose is to facilitate the transfer of knowledge gained in a classroom or lab setting into a field setting, but can be considered a barrier for entry into the geosciences for those with disabilities, caregiver/employment responsibilities, or financial constraints. Educators have begun turned to other modalities, such as virtual field experiences (VFEs), to create a more inclusive environment in the geosciences. However, the validity of VFEs as a replacement for, or augmentation to traditional field trips has yet to be established. The cognitive domain (e.g., knowledge, understanding, and comprehension) impacts of both traditional and virtual field trips on students have been studied extensively (Butler, 2008; Drummond & Markin, 2008; Hurst, 1998; Markowitz et al., 2018; Mead et al., 2019; Mogk & Goodwin, 2012; Whitmeyer et al., 2009), but the impacts to the affective domain (e.g., motivations, emotions, and perceptions) are comparatively sparse. To fully understand the implications of field trips on students, and to gain insight on how to broaden participation into the geosciences, the impacts of both traditional and virtual field trips on the affective domain need to be studied.In my study, I sought to understand the affective domain implications of a traditional field trip setting as well as a virtual field trip setting by qualitative methods. I used semi-structured interviews along with photographs to gain insight of the affective domain impacts from traditional field trips, and semi-structured interviews only for the virtual field trip. Results from the traditional field trip study indicate students need to be involved in a community of practice to elicit positive affective domain impacts. Negative affective domain impacts derive from multiple sources such as uncertainty of field trip logistics, lack of accommodations from the instructor in regards to required physical activities, and a student's lack of preparedness for a day out in the field. Results from the virtual field trip study indicate an overall positive affective domain impact, as every participant stated the experience exceeded their expectations of technological capabilities, user-ability, and interaction with the virtual environment. Participants remarked on the experience as being similar to traditional field trips, which enhanced immersion, and appreciated the iVFT as an option in lieu of a traditional field trip.The results of my study indicate the affective domain can be dominant in both a traditional and virtual field trip setting meaning educators need to account for a student's feelings, emotions, and perceptions when creating field trip experiences. Larger implications apply to broadening participation into the geosciences as the validity of VFEs as an option for those unable to attend a traditional field trip is becoming increasingly accepted.
590
$a
School code: 0206.
650
4
$a
Pedagogy.
$3
2122828
650
4
$a
Educational technology.
$3
517670
650
4
$a
Science education.
$3
521340
650
4
$a
Instructional design.
$3
3172279
650
4
$a
Geology.
$3
516570
653
$a
Diversity
653
$a
Virtual field trips
653
$a
Geology
653
$a
Inclusion
653
$a
Virtual reality
653
$a
Affective domain
653
$a
Experiential learning
653
$a
Geosciences education
690
$a
0456
690
$a
0710
690
$a
0447
690
$a
0714
690
$a
0372
710
2
$a
University of South Florida.
$b
Geology.
$3
2101955
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
82-11B.
790
$a
0206
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2021
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28410674
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9468820
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入
(1)帳號:一般為「身分證號」;外籍生或交換生則為「學號」。 (2)密碼:預設為帳號末四碼。
帳號
.
密碼
.
請在此電腦上記得個人資料
取消
忘記密碼? (請注意!您必須已在系統登記E-mail信箱方能使用。)